2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The first 2027 SJC has revealed themselves as either a total cheat by doing the future reclass fraud or by reclassing and transferring but still competing down bc they are not a 2028 yet. Congratulations, you still aren’t very good. Let us know what d2 school gets you.

Wouldn't he be better off playing a 27 schedule this summer to get more college eyes on him?

Not doing that bc he’s not that good. Doesn’t want to embarrass himself by playing against like players.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PG year first. Then NAPS. Then Navy.

Yikes.

Shouldn't it be either PG or NAPS? And then Navy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PG year first. Then NAPS. Then Navy.

Yikes.

Shouldn't it be either PG or NAPS? And then Navy.

That's what I would think. I can't imagine it's both.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The first 2027 SJC has revealed themselves as either a total cheat by doing the future reclass fraud or by reclassing and transferring but still competing down bc they are not a 2028 yet. Congratulations, you still aren’t very good. Let us know what d2 school gets you.

Wouldn't he be better off playing a 27 schedule this summer to get more college eyes on him?

Not doing that bc he’s not that good. Doesn’t want to embarrass himself by playing against like players.

at this level, reclassing does not make a big difference. if a kid is not cutting it as a 2027, you won't do any better as a 2028.

[Anonymous]

SJC RUNS THE WORLD

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SJC RUNS THE WORLD

then why is everyone transferring out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PG year first. Then NAPS. Then Navy.

Yikes.

Shouldn't it be either PG or NAPS? And then Navy.

That's what I would think. I can't imagine it's both.

Even naps has minimum gpa requirements

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone else see the GZ graduation banner with the “and #42 too” on the bottom. Way to make the entire graduation about your kid who didn’t do much on the field all year. Cornball

Say more please because I didn’t see it. However you’re speaking of a parent who drives a purple suburban so literally nothing would surprise me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone else see the GZ graduation banner with the “and #42 too” on the bottom. Way to make the entire graduation about your kid who didn’t do much on the field all year. Cornball

Say more please because I didn’t see it. However you’re speaking of a parent who drives a purple suburban so literally nothing would surprise me.

ick

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SJC RUNS THE WORLD

then why is everyone transferring out?

I believe another pole and a middie are waiting to see if admission spots open at other schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PG year first. Then NAPS. Then Navy.

Yikes.

So, given that this is an 11-year path laid out here (1yr PG, 1 yr NAPS, 4 yrs USNA, 5 yrs active duty - if you dont want to pay back the entirety of your tuition, assuming you make it through to graduation), I get the yikes. But, thats some first class education in those first 6 yrs, and the careers following the 5 yr commitment are definitely pretty strong options-wise and AI-resilient wise. So, I can see why that's not a yikes for the player or his family.

Why the PG year before NAPS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone else see the GZ graduation banner with the “and #42 too” on the bottom. Way to make the entire graduation about your kid who didn’t do much on the field all year. Cornball

Say more please because I didn’t see it. However you’re speaking of a parent who drives a purple suburban so literally nothing would surprise me.

There are pictures of it all over social media...really tasteless

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PG year first. Then NAPS. Then Navy.

Yikes.

So, given that this is an 11-year path laid out here (1yr PG, 1 yr NAPS, 4 yrs USNA, 5 yrs active duty - if you dont want to pay back the entirety of your tuition, assuming you make it through to graduation), I get the yikes. But, thats some first class education in those first 6 yrs, and the careers following the 5 yr commitment are definitely pretty strong options-wise and AI-resilient wise. So, I can see why that's not a yikes for the player or his family.

Why the PG year before NAPS?

Not OP but who knows - typo/conflating Navy Prep with PG (they’re basically the same) in original post would be my guess. Kinda irrelevant frankly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The first 2027 SJC has revealed themselves as either a total cheat by doing the future reclass fraud or by reclassing and transferring but still competing down bc they are not a 2028 yet. Congratulations, you still aren’t very good. Let us know what d2 school gets you.

Wouldn't he be better off playing a 27 schedule this summer to get more college eyes on him?

Not doing that bc he’s not that good. Doesn’t want to embarrass himself by playing against like players.

is this a d-pole who plays(ed) for MadLax 2027?

[Anonymous]

2 poles from ml and sjc. 1 is playing down even though all his social media, except for the 2028 “showcase” he just played, has him as 2027. This is the clown show of lax. A very average player reclasses in high school, buys some stars and rides the bench or quits in college. The other is waiting on where he can go.