|
1. People need to respect nature. It's the land - you can't have a zillion rich people build up in places like these with Santa Ana winds, drought conditions, limited water supplies. Duh. There is only so much you can do to fight nature. Nature wins EVERY time. EVERY EVERY EVERY time. See hurricanes, earthquakes, et al.
2. People don't understand that wildfires to some extent are nature's way of regenerating themselves. If you are there - that is sad for you. 3. You can (I know human nature is too stupid) rebuild there but I don't know if any business sensible organization ie ordinary insurance co. will will work with you. So anyone who does does at their own risk, as well as they should incur that risk - nobody else, ie rest of people who should not have their premiums raised. 4. There's simply too many people is all. Not enough land. It's not just global warming. Maybe some of the time it can be related to climate changing setting off the spark for these tragedies but not every time. People need to stop blaming global warming for every damn thing. While I think we definitely damage the planet, we do it by stuff like this. We don't respect the land at all. We build, rebuild, pollute, think we can fight nature and have exactly what we want by spending enough tech/money on it. We can't. We do what we can to survive. There's a point where greed doesn't dominate. Not sure what the answer is except that you have to be prepared for these things if you live in those parts. Not sure why it's this huge surprise. Kinda like FL - if you choose to live where wildfires, hurricanes have happened, guess what will happen consistently? You can do it but you have to manage expectations. |
Who is gleeful? Specific people you know today were telling you, a CA person, that they were happy about CA fires? |
Californian here. I think it’s entirely possible that the state turns deep red politically. There is already a lot of anger at the left simmering under the surface. |
Yeah and taxing the Uber wealthy at every possible opportunity (think tax on houses valued over Xmillion) is the fastest way to get it there. CA seems like it’s in a death spiral in so many ways, I really hope this doesn’t happen. |
| Is the Eaton space center ok? |
This is your wet dream isn't it. Blame the left for everything that has happened there including natural disasters. |
It's naive to think certain decisions and policies didn't make this situation much worse than it could have been. They knew damn well the risks of wild fires and did little to prevent them. |
How the F does one prevent wild fires? Like just wave a magic wand? I mean - this is what stupid means - wildfires don't exist because of humans. They happen whether we are around or not. You can't prevent wild + fire. What you do is you accept them. You figure out how to manage your expectations around them happening - what your plan is when they occur. They will occur and reoccur and there is not a DAMN thing a human being can do to prevent them from occurring! Like - how do you prevent to sun from rising or ocean tides?? Ugh. |
Ask PG&E maybe they can give you a clue. |
Californian here: Uh, what? California spent nearly $3B on fire mitigation in 2023 and spent another $4B from the Feds. People should be angry at themselves for building in a place that is not hospitable to homes. Southern California is literally grasslands-desert. How much more should California spend? At a certain point, this is a matter of personal responsibility. |
Maybe stop building homes in a fire prone area. |
They can't control hurricane force winds. |
NP- I don't get this. These are well-established neighborhoods, over 100 years old. Many folks have been there for decades, normal MC people. What are they supposed to do? Are you welcoming them in your DC mansion? |
+1 Its like people who lost homes here in the derecho and blaming them for living there - you can't control extreme conditions like 70 mph winds. That's beyond the realm of mitigation preparations. |
Do you think wind starts fires? |