They should have divorced them in NY state. 50/50 doesn't save you from child support if you are the higher earning spouse. I think the NY model should be rolled out nationwide. |
You are no more parenting them alone than the parent whose spouse is out of town. There is another adult in the world who is alive and has full moral and biological responsibility for the child should anything happen to you. Single moms don't have that, and you need to appreciate what a huge burden that is nad stop pretending you have it. |
Here's the thing, I'm divorced, so I'm a single person. I'm a mom, so that makes me a single mom. My kids dad is also divorced and is not married, so he is single. He is a single dad. We are the kids parents, and we are both single. I mean this really isn't rocket science. |
I hear you, but do it seek to control how others define themselves.
I have never been married and adopted a child. I was therefore our sole financial support and did every job that comes with raising a child and running a household. I noticed that SAHMs often discount the financial support and running household support that a spouse provides (e.g., servicing the car, emptying the trash, managing repairs). Everyone is very aware of their own contributions and tribulations. It is not a competition. Just support the people in this world that you care about. |
This. Can we please separate out trying to police how others use a very normal term from what apparently this is all about -- a competition about who has it better or worse? |
Oh FFS. If you don't get the difference I can't help you. And if you're not the kind of single mother that everyone here agrees can use the term, then drop it. No one cares what you think. |
See, some of the single mothers by choice that I know have massive trust funds and nannies and extended families that keep their kids a ton. If the only definition of being a "single mom" is poverty + having no help, then those women don't qualify. |
My friend is divorced and has a 50/50 schedule. She doesn’t call herself a “single” mom, she says she is divorced. Even with a helpful, involved ex-husband who co-parents amicably, there is a privilege that comes from having a 2 adult household. Married or partners cohabitating, sharing expenses is a huge help. Having 2 adults to coordinate dinner and car pool is a huge help.
We have talked about the pros and cons of a 50/50 schedule. When you are married to a decent partner, you are a partial parent all the time. You know you can tap out and ask for help if you need to. When you have 50/50, you are 0% parenting or 100% parenting. When you are on, you are fully ON. Then when you are off, you have all the home chores to do alone - dishes, laundry, home repairs, landscaping, holiday decor, etc. On the days she doesn’t have kids, she is technically off kid duty, but she has to squeeze in errands and other things because she can’t pop out to pick to groceries and leave kids home with the other parent. She can’t work late once in a while - on kid days she has to stop and pick up kids. |
Yes, and *actual* single parents are ON *100%* of the time. |
But they aren't, though. They can have nannies or sitters or use relatives or friends. |
They aren't on 100% of the time unless they are poor. Get real. |
Because she’s a liar. She isn’t a single mom, she’s a divorced mother co-parenting with her ex and trying to pretend he’s not parenting their children as well, presumably for sympathy. Military spouses aren’t single parents every time their spouses deploy, even though they may be “solo parenting” for awhile and it’s really difficult. |
By this inane logic, no one is a single parent, because anyone could use nannies or sitters or relatives or friends. |
But that's the PP's logic. Only women with no help at all are single mothers. |
You have a crazy chip on your shoulder about your spouse being a bad co-parent. |