Vance’s Latest Misogynistic View

[Anonymous]

My kids HS had a huge charity drive for monthly pads -including drawings - on their posters.

I was delighted!! Keep talking about menses , every day baby!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with his core premise—- it’s much better , in most cases, for a child to be raised by parents/grandparents vs daycare. Universal daycare is what is eww in this discussion.

I do too. Totally.

I would also like to point out that this audio is clearly edited... who knows what is spliced or missing. And, it is an article from Salon, so that makes it even more questionable.
Having said that, if advocating for having a grandparent assist with the care of a newborn infant is misogynistic, call me a misogynist. I like when he pointed out that she could have just continued working and given some of her salary to help them out, but she chose to help with the care itself.
And, I say this as someone who is currently in this exact position.... and I'm not Indian. A grandmother who is lucky enough to help with the care of her grandchild during the critical first years of development. I wouldn't trade it for anything in the world.

Talk about editing!!??

They did not say either grandparent. They referred to the one who has a uterus that can no longer carry a fetus to term, after which the person with the uterus is of limited use.

Being on a podcast with another dude talking about a woman's ability to menstruate is just deeply, deeply weird - even if it's the other guy who actually said "menstrual." Trying to explain it away as being more about the concept of grandparents generally being involved in childcare is really disingenuous.

And don't forget that this is the guy who said that people without kids don't have a stake in the future of the country. This guy 100% has a breeding fetish.

[Anonymous]

It's weird that the men who can't even begin to handle readily available pads for everyone in school.... Because oh my God. What will happen to the boys.... Sure, like to talk about women's periods a lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with his core premise—- it’s much better , in most cases, for a child to be raised by parents/grandparents vs daycare. Universal daycare is what is eww in this discussion.

His “core premise” is that women should be relegated to a handful of roles in society.

Men get to have all of the rest.

THAT core premise is NOT good for children or society.

(If his premise rested on helping children, there would be no need to specify the gender of the grandparent who watches them, nor whether that person is still having periods!!!)

He did neither of those things - the host did. That he absentmindedly replied, “Yes,” doesn’t mean that’s what he thinks. Good grief, you people are nutcases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with his core premise—- it’s much better , in most cases, for a child to be raised by parents/grandparents vs daycare. Universal daycare is what is eww in this discussion.

His “core premise” is that women should be relegated to a handful of roles in society.

Men get to have all of the rest.

THAT core premise is NOT good for children or society.

(If his premise rested on helping children, there would be no need to specify the gender of the grandparent who watches them, nor whether that person is still having periods!!!)

He did neither of those things - the host did. That he absentmindedly replied, “Yes,” doesn’t mean that’s what he thinks. Good grief, you people are nutcases.

That’s what you have? That he wasn’t paying attention to the crazy stuff his interviewer was saying and went along with it? That in and of itself is disqualifying to be VP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with his core premise—- it’s much better , in most cases, for a child to be raised by parents/grandparents vs daycare. Universal daycare is what is eww in this discussion.

His “core premise” is that women should be relegated to a handful of roles in society.

Men get to have all of the rest.

THAT core premise is NOT good for children or society.

(If his premise rested on helping children, there would be no need to specify the gender of the grandparent who watches them, nor whether that person is still having periods!!!)

He did neither of those things - the host did. That he absentmindedly replied, “Yes,” doesn’t mean that’s what he thinks. Good grief, you people are nutcases.

That’s what you have? That he wasn’t paying attention to the crazy stuff his interviewer was saying and went along with it? That in and of itself is disqualifying to be VP.

+1

“I didn’t know I was signing Alaska back to Russia! My mind wandered!!”

[Anonymous]

I like some aspects of him policy wise, but he is...weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I like some aspects of him policy wise, but he is...weird.

What policies are ther to like? Most of what he says is either idiotic or moronic?

Enquiring minds want to know! Enlighten me, please.

[Anonymous]

How did he get accepted to Yale?

Branding fail for Yale

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How did he get accepted to Yale?

Branding fail for Yale

Economic diversity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How did he get accepted to Yale?

Branding fail for Yale

Intel help not intelligence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with his core premise—- it’s much better , in most cases, for a child to be raised by parents/grandparents vs daycare. Universal daycare is what is eww in this discussion.

His “core premise” is that women should be relegated to a handful of roles in society.

Men get to have all of the rest.

THAT core premise is NOT good for children or society.

(If his premise rested on helping children, there would be no need to specify the gender of the grandparent who watches them, nor whether that person is still having periods!!!)

He did neither of those things - the host did. That he absentmindedly replied, “Yes,” doesn’t mean that’s what he thinks. Good grief, you people are nutcases.

In which case he would have scrambled to distance himself from a disgusting and offensive POV when it came to light, right?

And yet no apology forthcoming for this one either…it’s like he actually believes the statement he agreed with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did he get accepted to Yale?

Branding fail for Yale

Economic diversity.

What were his SAT/ACT and LSAT scores? What was his OSU graduating GPA? He ought to release his OSU and YLS transcripts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How did he get accepted to Yale?

Branding fail for Yale

Made far more suspicious when you factor in he was allegedly doubling up on credit hours at OSU to graduate in two years, AND interning on the Hill, AND found the time to prep for LSAT, AND apply to the most elite law schools in the nation. All of that in only two years.

It certainly reads like he had some help—to curate this CV for a memoir, Netflix, and politics.

[Anonymous]

vance has been saying on the trail that he is angling for a 4th child and trying to convince usha. how much time does he even get to spend with the three very young children he has now??