Friends. You honestly believe a childless 32 year old M incel who makes 500k with a 15M estate is posting on a parent board? Come on now let’s use our critical thinking skills. |
Nah. He'll be fine if he does that. Especially if he has boys, who need a dad much more than a mom. |
Millions of perfectly decent men get blindsided with divorce just because she decided one day she wasn't haaaaaappy. |
I know of several women who did this. They found a sperm donor and carried the pregnancy themselves, but otherwise more or less the same. If this is what you want, go for it. You have the resources to make yourself happy. |
He sock puppet trolls too! |
Ignorance is bliss to these “perfectly decent men.” |
I know, how embarrassing. No equity income, no carry, no passive income, no ownership. Troll giveaways bragging about a paycheck. Paychecks are for overtaxed fools who take orders. |
I don’t normally believe this when people write this on here, but you wouldn’t say this if you flipped the genders. |
This happens. Millions might be stretching it, but there are decent men married to difficult women out there. |
If you are not settling down with a partner because you think members of the opposite sex are trash who will steal your money, you should not be having a kid. Regardless of whether you are male or female. But there aren't any women like this (and there aren't any men, either, just incels cosplaying at it.) If you have a kid on your own because you want to raise a kid and you have given up on finding a partner, that's completely different. |
I don’t know. People change their views on this. Particularly if they have a child of the opposite gender or have a good relationship or any kind with someone of the opposite gender. If this were real, I would say that the real danger here is that he starts sleeping with his kids’ nanny and marries her. Then all of his biases about women just wanting money will be confirmed when she stops acting like his employee and expects to use “his” money to fit in with other UMC SAHMs. |
Correct, coming from the PP who wrote the response to which the other PP thought I was being one-sided in my admonition. Also the vitriol towards women from the post and yet its women that he would be paying to carry his children and take care of them but damn the money-grubbing wench who would be his wife. |
Dude said he wants children but does not want to get married. Didn't you read that part? |
DUDE saiddd "I do not see any upsides and plenty of downsides to getting married if it ends up in divorce. A pre-nup is not 100% guaranteed" related to "seriously considering not getting married". So hes worried about someone taking his money if he gets divorced, hence hes worried about money grubbing wenches/women. His pause about marriage is due to divorce and prenups. But no concerns about surrogacy legal agreements or a paid stranger taking care of his kids.
|
That is not 100% guaranteed. Here is a quote from Guns N' Roses November Rain lyrics: "'Cause nothin' lasts forever And we both know hearts can change" |