
Surely you don’t believe that all of the many, many maulings posted here were perpetrated by dogs who were abused by tough guy gang members? |
You clearly don’t live out west. I had a family member that had a wolf-husky hybrid. It was incredibly cute but bit her kid in the face. It did not eat her kid or mail the kid to death — it was a defensive bite by the dog because her perceived the child as invading his space. So that’s one data point on wolves. I’ve never heard of a coyote mauling or eating a human over the age of 3 but I don’t know anyone with a pet coyote. |
The vast majority yrs. Maybe they don't have to be gang members but people who only get the dogs to improve their tough guy image. If they live outside and aren't treated like a member of the family. Or thise with many dogs like the guy in LA where one attacks and the other join in |
Vast majority? I don’t think so. |
You "believe" but, yet offer no facts. But don't just take my word for it https://worldanimalfoundation.org/dogs/pitbull-statistics/ |
No one is opposed to this, I think. |
So you cite to ridiculous pro-pit propaganda, just laughable. Except it’s no laughing matter. Go to dogsbite.org for the unvarnished truth about pitbull attacks. Most pit bull attacks happen to owners, family members, visiting friends, dog sitters, neighbors, and strangers who happen to be walking where somebody’s pit bull got loose. There are countless stories of regular Joes and Janes who raised their pit bulls with love, never neglected or abused them, trained them well and then were horrified to see them kill a family member or friend. It’s about the deep seated, thousands of generations of breeding in certain behaviors (attack without warning, hair trigger, bite and hold at all cost and in the face of extreme pain) which cannot be bred out in a few generations because suddenly there is a host of people foolish enough to think pit bulls are sweet babies, nanny dogs and all the other BS propaganda about these potentially lethal dogs. |
Wrong. That organization if very against pit bulls and they cannot be trusted. |
Just because a rational organization who publishes the public record reports of dog bites and dog maulings of human beings has taken a position based on overwhelming statistics that this is a dangerous breed doesn’t make them untrustworthy. Unless you are an irrational owner of a rescued ‘pitty baby’ who sleeps with your innocent kids who might someday get mauled and then you’ll cry ‘but s/he never showed any aggression until s/he ate my child’s face off!’ We can all see who is biased here, poster. ~ former prosecutor trained in handling dangerous dog cases, well informed on the statistics and most of the major cases where pet dogs have eaten people. Hint: mostly pit bulls, other bully breed mixes, Rottweilers and GSDs. All bred and trained for thousands of doggy generations to be highly capable of killing both humans and very large animals much bigger and more dangerous than humans. But they’re nanny dogs! ![]() |
Because pitbulls kill so many people. |
You are judging my dog by the fact he hss 30 percent American pit bull terrier in him. That doesn't seem quite fair to me. You say I am biased but look in the mirror. Btw. No dogs or cats sleep in my bed. |
I would need to know more details. |
We kill more pit bulls than they kill us. Humans kill about one million a year. Humans also kill more humans and yet pit bulls are sern as the enemy |
Even the pro pit bull propaganda link made pit bulls sound incredibly dangerous. Pit bulls aren’t the most likely breed to bite, but are responsible for 72% of human fatalities. They are not like other dogs. Yes, humans are to blame for that because we bred them and used them in violent ways — but pit bulls are undeniably dangerous. |
I can’t tell if this post is serious or not. |