Defund the Police versus Abortion Bans

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I'm sorry. There is no comparison with states that literally ban books.

Why do people say this? It’s so obviously partisan. I don’t want to ban any book. They can continue to be published, printed, and then every county library.

It is true, I do not want porno graphic content in ES/MS.

Cartoony sex ed books aren’t “porn”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It all comes down to a numbers game and good or bad the election will come down to how well Americans understand math.

Violent crimes happen more than abortions either about 33% more violent crimes than abortions occurring every year in the United States.

If you look at overall crimes, there are 17 crimes committed for every abortion in the United States every year.

Defund the police and the occurrence of violent and non violent crimes continues to rise. Implement reasonable abortion restrictions and abortions continue to occur although the numbers will most likely decrease.

So for those that make data driven decisions it is an easy one to make.

This is not correct at all re: abortions. It’s the opposite in epic proportions. Abortions (medical term, NOT “elective”) are so common. This is what politicians don’t (want to) understand.
They are a normal part of a women’s lifetime, affecting 50% of pregnancies.
Yes, the medical term abortion applies to all pregnancies where, to nobody’s fault, a pregnancy could not go forward. It is highly likely that each woman, if she becomes pregnant a few times in her life, will need abortion care at some point. Not providing the best care available harms a woman’s fertility, her life, and the lives of future babies that could have been!

50%? That is worldwide. US is 25%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'm sorry. There is no comparison with states that literally ban books.

Why do people say this? It’s so obviously partisan. I don’t want to ban any book. They can continue to be published, printed, and then every county library.

It is true, I do not want porno graphic content in ES/MS.

Cartoony sex ed books aren’t “porn”.

You’d be looking for a divorce lawyer before breakfast tomorrow if you discovered “cartoony” illustrations like those in the books saved on your husband’s phone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'm sorry. There is no comparison with states that literally ban books.

Why do people say this? It’s so obviously partisan. I don’t want to ban any book. They can continue to be published, printed, and then every county library.

It is true, I do not want porno graphic content in ES/MS.

Cartoony sex ed books aren’t “porn”.

You’d be looking for a divorce lawyer before breakfast tomorrow if you discovered “cartoony” illustrations like those in the books saved on your husband’s phone.

You think your husband doesn’t look at porn???!????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'm sorry. There is no comparison with states that literally ban books.

Why do people say this? It’s so obviously partisan. I don’t want to ban any book. They can continue to be published, printed, and then every county library.

It is true, I do not want porno graphic content in ES/MS.

Cartoony sex ed books aren’t “porn”.

You’d be looking for a divorce lawyer before breakfast tomorrow if you discovered “cartoony” illustrations like those in the books saved on your husband’s phone.

You would divorce your husband if he read a sex ed book?

That is completely nuts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'm sorry. There is no comparison with states that literally ban books.

Why do people say this? It’s so obviously partisan. I don’t want to ban any book. They can continue to be published, printed, and then every county library.

It is true, I do not want porno graphic content in ES/MS.

Cartoony sex ed books aren’t “porn”.

You’d be looking for a divorce lawyer before breakfast tomorrow if you discovered “cartoony” illustrations like those in the books saved on your husband’s phone.

That would certainly be weird but that doesn’t make it porn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'm sorry. There is no comparison with states that literally ban books.

Why do people say this? It’s so obviously partisan. I don’t want to ban any book. They can continue to be published, printed, and then every county library.

It is true, I do not want porno graphic content in ES/MS.

Cartoony sex ed books aren’t “porn”.

You’d be looking for a divorce lawyer before breakfast tomorrow if you discovered “cartoony” illustrations like those in the books saved on your husband’s phone.

NP but DH and I both watch porn as happy and healthy married parents in our 40s and have a great sex life. Something like 95% of men do, and a significant amount of women do (possibly the majority depending on the way polling is done as women are more likely to be shamed for it and feel shame about it). Don't think it's the divorce ticket you think it is, unless you live under a rock (I guess you do?).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I'm sorry. There is no comparison with states that literally ban books.

Why do people say this? It’s so obviously partisan. I don’t want to ban any book. They can continue to be published, printed, and then every county library.

It is true, I do not want porno graphic content in ES/MS.

Book-banner denies being a book-banner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'm sorry. There is no comparison with states that literally ban books.

Why do people say this? It’s so obviously partisan. I don’t want to ban any book. They can continue to be published, printed, and then every county library.

It is true, I do not want porno graphic content in ES/MS.

Book-banner denies being a book-banner.

Not to mention, why are these posters so gullible? Have they actually seen graphic sexual content in THEIR kids elementary school? No. Fox News or whoever just told them to freak out so they did.

[Anonymous]

The results are in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The results are in.

All I can say is thank God.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'm sorry. There is no comparison with states that literally ban books.

Why do people say this? It’s so obviously partisan. I don’t want to ban any book. They can continue to be published, printed, and then every county library.

It is true, I do not want porno graphic content in ES/MS.

Book-banner denies being a book-banner.

Not to mention, why are these posters so gullible? Have they actually seen graphic sexual content in THEIR kids elementary school? No. Fox News or whoever just told them to freak out so they did.

They likely don't even have kids in elementary school.

[Anonymous]

Let's be honest about the books we are discussing.

Illustrations of teens having sex for fun don't belong in the Elementary or Middle School. This is not "sex ed" like learning biology, and pretending that these most challenged books are tame just feeds into the narrative that left wingers are out of touch sex-for-children promoters.

https://www.toledolibrary.org/blog/banned-books-week-why-is-gender-queer-the-most-challenged-book

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let's be honest about the books we are discussing.

Illustrations of teens having sex for fun don't belong in the Elementary or Middle School. This is not "sex ed" like learning biology, and pretending that these most challenged books are tame just feeds into the narrative that left wingers are out of touch sex-for-children promoters.

https://www.toledolibrary.org/blog/banned-books-week-why-is-gender-queer-the-most-challenged-book

Says you. I think it's fine for middle-school libraries and YA sections of public school libraries to include Gender Queer. If you're a parent of a middle-schooler, and you don't want your child to check out Gender Queer from the library, you should talk to your child about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let's be honest about the books we are discussing.

Illustrations of teens having sex for fun don't belong in the Elementary or Middle School. This is not "sex ed" like learning biology, and pretending that these most challenged books are tame just feeds into the narrative that left wingers are out of touch sex-for-children promoters.

https://www.toledolibrary.org/blog/banned-books-week-why-is-gender-queer-the-most-challenged-book

Please show me any elementary school in VA that has any book containing "illustrations of teens having sex".