I'm sorry. There is no comparison with states that literally ban books. |
Not in most places. DC? Maybe. |
And NOVA, and NYC, and … |
You had a choice and had to face consequences of that choice. That's what adults do. You chose not to get vaccinated then you can chose to eat at home, not got a concert and qualify for a organ transplant. It's really that simple. |
+1 |
This is not correct at all re: abortions. It’s the opposite in epic proportions. Abortions (medical term, NOT “elective”) are so common. This is what politicians don’t (want to) understand. They are a normal part of a women’s lifetime, affecting 50% of pregnancies. Yes, the medical term abortion applies to all pregnancies where, to nobody’s fault, a pregnancy could not go forward. It is highly likely that each woman, if she becomes pregnant a few times in her life, will need abortion care at some point. Not providing the best care available harms a woman’s fertility, her life, and the lives of future babies that could have been! |
I think the Democrats suck at this messaging though, it’s not clear enough. I’d like to hear the Democrats say this. |
Yup. |
Quote us accurately: we don’t want to ban all books. Just the ones in middle school libraries that show graphic art depictions (because photos would be child porn) of minors engaged in sexual intercourse and oral sex with adult men. Those are the only books I want banned in Fairfax County public schools. So please quote us accurately. Thank you. |
Which is alarming, because normally it’s only blue states with schools in horrid shape. |
Please provide citation for stolen seats claim. |
Yep. And now a year or two later, they’re trying to gaslight everyone and deny it ever even happened. It’s incredible really. Reminds me of classic domestic abuser gaslighting behavior. |
Why do people say this? It’s so obviously partisan. I don’t want to ban any book. They can continue to be published, printed, and then every county library. It is true, I do not want porno graphic content in ES/MS. |
What I see when I go the source referenced in that article are a couple of things: 1) “Uptick” is probably the right word. It barely registered and it fell from 2018-2019. And ticked up very slightly in 2020 and 2022. Like we are talking a rate of 234 incidents per 100,000 people in 2022 compared to 208.7 in 2000. The United States rate overall is was 380.7 incidents per 100,000. 2) The “uptick” includes three years of Trump’s administration (2018, 2019, 2020) 3) There is an important caveat about data anomalies in the footnotes regarding the 2021 figures that say that data cannot be added to 5-10- and 20-year trend presentations that used different methodologies. In other words, they calculated things differently in 2021, the first real year of the “uptick.” Context matters. https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/explorer/crime/crime-trend |
Anti-vaxxers think that getting a nasal swab once a week during COVID was as bad as forcing a woman to carry a pregnancy and give birth. |