Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like he got into a fight in the house, the dog bit him, and at some point during these events, he fell and hit his head. Then he wondered outside and she was too drunk to notice his weird behavior was because he’s been beat up and attacked. She left and he collapsed in the snow.

Maybe she also hit him but unless he landed in his head and miraculously had no other impact injuries from her big SUV, this doesn’t make sense.

Timeline doesn’t work. Either she hit him, or he went to puke by the flag pole and hit his head or something happened to him after she left or a combination of the two latter points. My most likely theory is that: accidental fall and mcalberts running around like idiots butt dialing each other and trying to cover up his death to avoid being blamed rather than calling 911, resulting in no justice ever being served.

I still think the dog had something to do with it. Even if it was just they were taking dog out, dog sees body and goes berserk…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like he got into a fight in the house, the dog bit him, and at some point during these events, he fell and hit his head. Then he wondered outside and she was too drunk to notice his weird behavior was because he’s been beat up and attacked. She left and he collapsed in the snow.

Maybe she also hit him but unless he landed in his head and miraculously had no other impact injuries from her big SUV, this doesn’t make sense.

Timeline doesn’t work. Either she hit him, or he went to puke by the flag pole and hit his head or something happened to him after she left or a combination of the two latter points. My most likely theory is that: accidental fall and mcalberts running around like idiots butt dialing each other and trying to cover up his death to avoid being blamed rather than calling 911, resulting in no justice ever being served.

I still think the dog had something to do with it. Even if it was just they were taking dog out, dog sees body and goes berserk…

Yes, I think it’s possible for sure. The dog plus an accident, them trying to move him…it would explain why everything is so confusing.

[Anonymous]

TMZ interviewed a juror. He doesn't seem to think KR was framed, just that there wasn't evidence she killed him. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CvL83eByzw

[Anonymous]

Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.

You have no idea if it was “random”. For all we know, they were into some crooked stuff together and had a disagreement. Their behavior suggests they had a lot to hide- whatever that is.

I don’t listen to podcasts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.

Hey I listen to crime podcasts a lot! I definitely don't think this was a frame job. Well, it was by Turtle Boy and Karen Read.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.

Or idk he went in the garage by accident and the dog who doesn’t like strangers was in there because they were having a party, the dog jumped him, he fell backwards on the garage concrete step and died immediately. The cop didn’t want the manslaughter charge or legal liability so he put his phone on his chest and dragged him outside at 3:30am after the plow driver’s first pass.

Not sure why I argue with idiots that aren’t even familiar with the very basic facts of the case. Drunk GIRLFRIEND not wife.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.

Hey I listen to crime podcasts a lot! I definitely don't think this was a frame job. Well, it was by Turtle Boy and Karen Read.

Yes, definitely Turtleboys fault that the Cellebrite extract the defense was provided by the Commonwealth said Jen googled “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am.

Had that been on Karen’s phone under the exact same browser state circumstances, it would have gotten her convicted of murder. But because it’s on JEN’s phone she’s been slandered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.

Hey I listen to crime podcasts a lot! I definitely don't think this was a frame job. Well, it was by Turtle Boy and Karen Read.

Yes, definitely Turtleboys fault that the Cellebrite extract the defense was provided by the Commonwealth said Jen googled “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am.

Had that been on Karen’s phone under the exact same browser state circumstances, it would have gotten her convicted of murder. But because it’s on JEN’s phone she’s been slandered.

I agree. Had she actually googled at 2:27. However, multiple experts testified why that was not the case including a Cellbrite expert. https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/04/28/.../#ian-whiffin-part-1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.

Or idk he went in the garage by accident and the dog who doesn’t like strangers was in there because they were having a party, the dog jumped him, he fell backwards on the garage concrete step and died immediately. The cop didn’t want the manslaughter charge or legal liability so he put his phone on his chest and dragged him outside at 3:30am after the plow driver’s first pass.

Not sure why I argue with idiots that aren’t even familiar with the very basic facts of the case. Drunk GIRLFRIEND not wife.

This makes the most sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.

Hey I listen to crime podcasts a lot! I definitely don't think this was a frame job. Well, it was by Turtle Boy and Karen Read.

Yes, definitely Turtleboys fault that the Cellebrite extract the defense was provided by the Commonwealth said Jen googled “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am.

Had that been on Karen’s phone under the exact same browser state circumstances, it would have gotten her convicted of murder. But because it’s on JEN’s phone she’s been slandered.

Because Jen isn't the one who left verbally abusive messages, and backed up at high speed...

[Anonymous]

There is only one thing I know for absolute certain about this whole case/phenomenon:

Shakespeare would have been very impressed with the levels of Shakespearean tragedy contained therein.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.

Hey I listen to crime podcasts a lot! I definitely don't think this was a frame job. Well, it was by Turtle Boy and Karen Read.

Yes, definitely Turtleboys fault that the Cellebrite extract the defense was provided by the Commonwealth said Jen googled “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am.

Had that been on Karen’s phone under the exact same browser state circumstances, it would have gotten her convicted of murder. But because it’s on JEN’s phone she’s been slandered.

Because Jen isn't the one who left verbally abusive messages, and backed up at high speed...

No but she did lie about calling the dead guy 8 times in 15 minutes after he would have been dead. Why lie about that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.

Hey I listen to crime podcasts a lot! I definitely don't think this was a frame job. Well, it was by Turtle Boy and Karen Read.

Yes, definitely Turtleboys fault that the Cellebrite extract the defense was provided by the Commonwealth said Jen googled “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am.

Had that been on Karen’s phone under the exact same browser state circumstances, it would have gotten her convicted of murder. But because it’s on JEN’s phone she’s been slandered.

I agree. Had she actually googled at 2:27. However, multiple experts testified why that was not the case including a Cellbrite expert. https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/04/28/.../#ian-whiffin-part-1

And one expert says she did.

Personally, I don’t think she did, but it’s at least an area of defense they had to explore vs “framing”. It was not and I would argue still isn’t 100% clear. The experts didn’t test with the same version of iOS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks cops randomly decided to take out a buddy and frame his drunk wife needs to delete their crime podcast apps. Listening to that crap every day has fried your brain.

Hey I listen to crime podcasts a lot! I definitely don't think this was a frame job. Well, it was by Turtle Boy and Karen Read.

Yes, definitely Turtleboys fault that the Cellebrite extract the defense was provided by the Commonwealth said Jen googled “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am.

Had that been on Karen’s phone under the exact same browser state circumstances, it would have gotten her convicted of murder. But because it’s on JEN’s phone she’s been slandered.

Because Jen isn't the one who left verbally abusive messages, and backed up at high speed...

If anything, the messages prove she didn’t knowingly hit him and leave him there. If you’re going to call someone as an “alibi” for NOT hitting him you’d leave loving ones. And not 55 of them. Probably 1-2 calls would be sufficient lol.

So that only would leave an accidental, unknowing strike, which I also don’t think happened, but it takes the voicemails out of the equation.