Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the fixation here about the whole “Rittenhouse crossed STATE LINES!!!”

I mean, lefties just keep telling us that borders aren’t real. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.

Ok, fine. You win. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.


So what’s the big deal then? He crossed an imaginary line on a map.

And?

HUMANS AREN’T ILLEGAL

And borders aren’t real.

So why is everyone so fixated on “HE CROSSED STATE LINES!!!!!” ?

[Anonymous]

ya, no biases here

[Anonymous]

If he was defending himself it is only after and because he traveled there with his AR-15 to maybe shoot some looters, was so stupid and reckless that he went into the crowd armed, then pissed his pants when they were not afraid of his dorky cosplay and tried to disarm him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the fixation here about the whole “Rittenhouse crossed STATE LINES!!!”

I mean, lefties just keep telling us that borders aren’t real. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.

Ok, fine. You win. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.


So what’s the big deal then? He crossed an imaginary line on a map.

And?

State lines matter because part of the issue was how he came to possess the gun in the first place.

And you are really reaching with the whole imaginary lines on a map thing.

It has been firmly established for some time that the gun was obtained in Wisconsin, so anything about crossing state lines is irrelevant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the fixation here about the whole “Rittenhouse crossed STATE LINES!!!”

I mean, lefties just keep telling us that borders aren’t real. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.

Ok, fine. You win. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.


So what’s the big deal then? He crossed an imaginary line on a map.

And?

State lines matter because part of the issue was how he came to possess the gun in the first place.

And you are really reaching with the whole imaginary lines on a map thing.

It has been firmly established for some time that the gun was obtained in Wisconsin, so anything about crossing state lines is irrelevant.

It was stored in Wisconsin as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the fixation here about the whole “Rittenhouse crossed STATE LINES!!!”

I mean, lefties just keep telling us that borders aren’t real. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.

Ok, fine. You win. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.


So what’s the big deal then? He crossed an imaginary line on a map.

And?

HUMANS AREN’T ILLEGAL

And borders aren’t real.

So why is everyone so fixated on “HE CROSSED STATE LINES!!!!!” ?

I don't get it either. He lived 30 minutes away. It's like someone in DC going into Maryland or Virginia or a New Yorker traveling to New Jersey or Connecticut. They're acting like he flew from some far away place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the fixation here about the whole “Rittenhouse crossed STATE LINES!!!”

I mean, lefties just keep telling us that borders aren’t real. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.

Ok, fine. You win. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.


So what’s the big deal then? He crossed an imaginary line on a map.

And?

HUMANS AREN’T ILLEGAL

And borders aren’t real.

So why is everyone so fixated on “HE CROSSED STATE LINES!!!!!” ?

I don't get it either. He lived 30 minutes away. It's like someone in DC going into Maryland or Virginia or a New Yorker traveling to New Jersey or Connecticut. They're acting like he flew from some far away place.

BUT THAT IS ILLEGALLY CROSSING A STATE LINE!!!!

[Anonymous]

If anyone is getting their “facts” from CBS, don’t bother weighing in.

CBS is literally fake news here.

CBS has been so biased from the beginning, it is pitiful. If their bias against Rittenhouse weren’t obvious enough, CBS has now been caught labeling Rittenhouse a “murderer.”

- apparently CBS skipped the year in school when they taught the Constitution, and the concept of innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Compounding CBS’ bias, they’ve now tried to delete their own text!

The mainstream (ie leftist) media has become a pathetic, woke-joke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the fixation here about the whole “Rittenhouse crossed STATE LINES!!!”

I mean, lefties just keep telling us that borders aren’t real. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.

Ok, fine. You win. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.


So what’s the big deal then? He crossed an imaginary line on a map.

And?

HUMANS AREN’T ILLEGAL

And borders aren’t real.

So why is everyone so fixated on “HE CROSSED STATE LINES!!!!!” ?

I don't get it either. He lived 30 minutes away. It's like someone in DC going into Maryland or Virginia or a New Yorker traveling to New Jersey or Connecticut. They're acting like he flew from some far away place.

BUT THAT IS ILLEGALLY CROSSING A STATE LINE!!!!

You are allowed to cross State lines all you want, he did not break any law crossing the State Line

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks that Kyle’s beliefs and background have literally nothing to do with this trial?

They have everything to do with this trial. Why else would the pig drive to another state armed?!

He crossed state lines to go from his mother’s house in IL to go to his father’s house in Kenosha, WI. The weapon didn’t cross state lines and was provided to Kyle in Kenosha.

He was violated the citywide curfew and WI law that prohibits minors from carrying a long gun, except for 16 and 17 year olds with the express purpose of hunting. He had cleaned up graffiti and used his medic kit earlier in the day.

So you are saying that an illegal straw purchase and being in possession of a long gun (legal for hunting) in a riot zone is ok? So you are saying he was hunting (rioters)?

Because I don't think there are many deer in downtown Kenosha in the summertime, and besides, buck season is in the fall, not summer.

So...?

He stated that he was there to protect a business……why are struggling to understand that?

No one gave him the authority to do so. We don’t have vigilante justice. We have cops there to do that. He was adding to the problem and killed two people.

whoa. This is still the United States. No one needs authority to do anything. The government has to have a justification to stop someone from doing something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the fixation here about the whole “Rittenhouse crossed STATE LINES!!!”

I mean, lefties just keep telling us that borders aren’t real. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.

Ok, fine. You win. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.


So what’s the big deal then? He crossed an imaginary line on a map.

And?

HUMANS AREN’T ILLEGAL

And borders aren’t real.

So why is everyone so fixated on “HE CROSSED STATE LINES!!!!!” ?

I don't get it either. He lived 30 minutes away. It's like someone in DC going into Maryland or Virginia or a New Yorker traveling to New Jersey or Connecticut. They're acting like he flew from some far away place.

It’s the fact that he went into a place that he didn’t belong that was having protests to fight protestors. He was getting involved instead of letting the police do their work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the fixation here about the whole “Rittenhouse crossed STATE LINES!!!”

I mean, lefties just keep telling us that borders aren’t real. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.

Ok, fine. You win. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.


So what’s the big deal then? He crossed an imaginary line on a map.

And?

HUMANS AREN’T ILLEGAL

And borders aren’t real.

So why is everyone so fixated on “HE CROSSED STATE LINES!!!!!” ?

I don't get it either. He lived 30 minutes away. It's like someone in DC going into Maryland or Virginia or a New Yorker traveling to New Jersey or Connecticut. They're acting like he flew from some far away place.

It’s the fact that he went into a place that he didn’t belong that was having protests to fight protestors. He was getting involved instead of letting the police do their work.

He was asked by a business owner to help protect his property, he wasn’t just randomly walking around. Here’s a thought…..if you’re going to endlessly post on this thread you might want to familiarize yourself with the basics of the case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


No one gave him the authority to do so. We don’t have vigilante justice. We have cops there to do that. He was adding to the problem and killed two people.

whoa. This is still the United States. No one needs authority to do anything. The government has to have a justification to stop someone from doing something.

The government holds a monopoly on legitimate violence. Violence not sanctioned by the government is illegal and punishable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the fixation here about the whole “Rittenhouse crossed STATE LINES!!!”

I mean, lefties just keep telling us that borders aren’t real. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.

Ok, fine. You win. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.


So what’s the big deal then? He crossed an imaginary line on a map.

And?

HUMANS AREN’T ILLEGAL

And borders aren’t real.

So why is everyone so fixated on “HE CROSSED STATE LINES!!!!!” ?

I don't get it either. He lived 30 minutes away. It's like someone in DC going into Maryland or Virginia or a New Yorker traveling to New Jersey or Connecticut. They're acting like he flew from some far away place.

It’s the fact that he went into a place that he didn’t belong that was having protests to fight protestors. He was getting involved instead of letting the police do their work.

He was asked by a business owner to help protect his property, he wasn’t just randomly walking around. Here’s a thought…..if you’re going to endlessly post on this thread you might want to familiarize yourself with the basics of the case.

In addition, his father lives in Kenosha and he had a lifeguard job there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the fixation here about the whole “Rittenhouse crossed STATE LINES!!!”

I mean, lefties just keep telling us that borders aren’t real. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.

Ok, fine. You win. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.


So what’s the big deal then? He crossed an imaginary line on a map.

And?

HUMANS AREN’T ILLEGAL

And borders aren’t real.

So why is everyone so fixated on “HE CROSSED STATE LINES!!!!!” ?

I don't get it either. He lived 30 minutes away. It's like someone in DC going into Maryland or Virginia or a New Yorker traveling to New Jersey or Connecticut. They're acting like he flew from some far away place.

It’s the fact that he went into a place that he didn’t belong that was having protests to fight protestors. He was getting involved instead of letting the police do their work.

He was asked by a business owner to help protect his property, he wasn’t just randomly walking around. Here’s a thought…..if you’re going to endlessly post on this thread you might want to familiarize yourself with the basics of the case.

NP who admits I haven’t been following the care closely. A local business owner asked an underage guy who couldn’t legally own a gun to travel into town with an illegal AR to guard his store? Really?