Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks that Kyle’s beliefs and background have literally nothing to do with this trial?

They have everything to do with this trial. Why else would the pig drive to another state armed?!

He crossed state lines to go from his mother’s house in IL to go to his father’s house in Kenosha, WI. The weapon didn’t cross state lines and was provided to Kyle in Kenosha.

He was violated the citywide curfew and WI law that prohibits minors from carrying a long gun, except for 16 and 17 year olds with the express purpose of hunting. He had cleaned up graffiti and used his medic kit earlier in the day.

So you are saying that an illegal straw purchase and being in possession of a long gun (legal for hunting) in a riot zone is ok? So you are saying he was hunting (rioters)?

Because I don't think there are many deer in downtown Kenosha in the summertime, and besides, buck season is in the fall, not summer.

So...?

He stated that he was there to protect a business……why are struggling to understand that?

No one gave him the authority to do so. We don’t have vigilante justice. We have cops there to do that. He was adding to the problem and killed two people.

The rioters were the ones that added to the problem as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are going to burn Kenosha again unless Rittenhouse gets convicted, and this time they will burn it to the ground. every inch of it.

If he is convicted then there will be no violence; nothing will happen.

Oh please. The far left doesn't get to rule the courts. If they want to go that route then many criminals will be rounded up, and sent to jail. Or hopefully worse.

Yes, the judge's bias demonstrates this very clearly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks that Kyle’s beliefs and background have literally nothing to do with this trial?

They have everything to do with this trial. Why else would the pig drive to another state armed?!

He crossed state lines to go from his mother’s house in IL to go to his father’s house in Kenosha, WI. The weapon didn’t cross state lines and was provided to Kyle in Kenosha.

He was violated the citywide curfew and WI law that prohibits minors from carrying a long gun, except for 16 and 17 year olds with the express purpose of hunting. He had cleaned up graffiti and used his medic kit earlier in the day.

So you are saying that an illegal straw purchase and being in possession of a long gun (legal for hunting) in a riot zone is ok? So you are saying he was hunting (rioters)?

Because I don't think there are many deer in downtown Kenosha in the summertime, and besides, buck season is in the fall, not summer.

So...?

He stated that he was there to protect a business……why are struggling to understand that?

No one gave him the authority to do so. We don’t have vigilante justice. We have cops there to do that. He was adding to the problem and killed two people.

The cops weren’t very effective at protecting businesses during the riots. Was he playing out some wannabe cop fantasy…….of course. Did he deserved to be attacked……of course not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are going to burn Kenosha again unless Rittenhouse gets convicted, and this time they will burn it to the ground. every inch of it.

If he is convicted then there will be no violence; nothing will happen.

Oh please. The far left doesn't get to rule the courts. If they want to go that route then many criminals will be rounded up, and sent to jail. Or hopefully worse.

Yes, the judge's bias demonstrates this very clearly.

The judge is a democrat, appointed by a democrat.

The prosecution just has no case and has been resorting to increasingly more outrageous and unethical tactics to try to make a case out of nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are going to burn Kenosha again unless Rittenhouse gets convicted, and this time they will burn it to the ground. every inch of it.

If he is convicted then there will be no violence; nothing will happen.

Oh please. The far left doesn't get to rule the courts. If they want to go that route then many criminals will be rounded up, and sent to jail. Or hopefully worse.

Yes, the judge's bias demonstrates this very clearly.

The judge is a democrat, appointed by a democrat.

The prosecution just has no case and has been resorting to increasingly more outrageous and unethical tactics to try to make a case out of nothing.

With Trump's theme song as his phone's ringtone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks that Kyle’s beliefs and background have literally nothing to do with this trial?

They have everything to do with this trial. Why else would the pig drive to another state armed?!

He crossed state lines to go from his mother’s house in IL to go to his father’s house in Kenosha, WI. The weapon didn’t cross state lines and was provided to Kyle in Kenosha.

He was violated the citywide curfew and WI law that prohibits minors from carrying a long gun, except for 16 and 17 year olds with the express purpose of hunting. He had cleaned up graffiti and used his medic kit earlier in the day.

So you are saying that an illegal straw purchase and being in possession of a long gun (legal for hunting) in a riot zone is ok? So you are saying he was hunting (rioters)?

Because I don't think there are many deer in downtown Kenosha in the summertime, and besides, buck season is in the fall, not summer.

So...?

He stated that he was there to protect a business……why are struggling to understand that?

No one gave him the authority to do so. We don’t have vigilante justice. We have cops there to do that. He was adding to the problem and killed two people.

The cops weren’t very effective at protecting businesses during the riots. Was he playing out some wannabe cop fantasy…….of course. Did he deserved to be attacked……of course not.

I don't think it matters. He was violently attacked then chased by a mob.

This never should have made it to trial especially since the video makes it clear he was the victim.

[Anonymous]

Burn down Kenosha. If anyone prosecutes you for it, just say you were afraid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks that Kyle’s beliefs and background have literally nothing to do with this trial?

They have everything to do with this trial. Why else would the pig drive to another state armed?!

He crossed state lines to go from his mother’s house in IL to go to his father’s house in Kenosha, WI. The weapon didn’t cross state lines and was provided to Kyle in Kenosha.

He was violated the citywide curfew and WI law that prohibits minors from carrying a long gun, except for 16 and 17 year olds with the express purpose of hunting. He had cleaned up graffiti and used his medic kit earlier in the day.

So you are saying that an illegal straw purchase and being in possession of a long gun (legal for hunting) in a riot zone is ok? So you are saying he was hunting (rioters)?

Because I don't think there are many deer in downtown Kenosha in the summertime, and besides, buck season is in the fall, not summer.

So...?

He stated that he was there to protect a business……why are struggling to understand that?

No one gave him the authority to do so. We don’t have vigilante justice. We have cops there to do that. He was adding to the problem and killed two people.

The cops weren’t very effective at protecting businesses during the riots. Was he playing out some wannabe cop fantasy…….of course. Did he deserved to be attacked……of course not.

Sorry, no that’s not how it works. The cops were doing their jobs. Rittenhouse wasn’t hired to be a cop, wasn’t trained to be a cop, and had no business being there. He is just as bad as the rest but also worse because he killed two and wounded one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are going to burn Kenosha again unless Rittenhouse gets convicted, and this time they will burn it to the ground. every inch of it.

If he is convicted then there will be no violence; nothing will happen.

Oh please. The far left doesn't get to rule the courts. If they want to go that route then many criminals will be rounded up, and sent to jail. Or hopefully worse.

Yes, the judge's bias demonstrates this very clearly.

The judge is a democrat, appointed by a democrat.

The prosecution just has no case and has been resorting to increasingly more outrageous and unethical tactics to try to make a case out of nothing.

With Trump's theme song as his phone's ringtone?

Trump's theme song? That song was written in 1984 and has been a top 10 hit at least twice over the years and is certified platinum but you know it's "Trump's theme song".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I didn't see any ANTIFA wielding automatic weapons. Just the underage right wing supremicist.

Automatic weapons were banned in the 30s

We know who the problem is in America. It’s the white supremacists that are a huge problem and are terrorists.

At least get your facts straight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks that Kyle’s beliefs and background have literally nothing to do with this trial?

They have everything to do with this trial. Why else would the pig drive to another state armed?!

He crossed state lines to go from his mother’s house in IL to go to his father’s house in Kenosha, WI. The weapon didn’t cross state lines and was provided to Kyle in Kenosha.

He was violated the citywide curfew and WI law that prohibits minors from carrying a long gun, except for 16 and 17 year olds with the express purpose of hunting. He had cleaned up graffiti and used his medic kit earlier in the day.

So you are saying that an illegal straw purchase and being in possession of a long gun (legal for hunting) in a riot zone is ok? So you are saying he was hunting (rioters)?

Because I don't think there are many deer in downtown Kenosha in the summertime, and besides, buck season is in the fall, not summer.

So...?

He stated that he was there to protect a business……why are struggling to understand that?

No one gave him the authority to do so. We don’t have vigilante justice. We have cops there to do that. He was adding to the problem and killed two people.

The cops weren’t very effective at protecting businesses during the riots. Was he playing out some wannabe cop fantasy…….of course. Did he deserved to be attacked……of course not.

Sorry, no that’s not how it works. The cops were doing their jobs. Rittenhouse wasn’t hired to be a cop, wasn’t trained to be a cop, and had no business being there. He is just as bad as the rest but also worse because he killed two and wounded one.

Actually that’s exactly how it works. If the police are unable to provide protection to your property you have every right to solicit volunteers to act as deterrents. Two people chose to attack and initiated a string of events that led to their demise. It’s pretty straightforward.

[Anonymous]

I don’t understand the fixation here about the whole “Rittenhouse crossed STATE LINES!!!”

I mean, lefties just keep telling us that borders aren’t real. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.

Ok, fine. You win. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.


So what’s the big deal then? He crossed an imaginary line on a map.

And?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks that Kyle’s beliefs and background have literally nothing to do with this trial?

They have everything to do with this trial. Why else would the pig drive to another state armed?!

He crossed state lines to go from his mother’s house in IL to go to his father’s house in Kenosha, WI. The weapon didn’t cross state lines and was provided to Kyle in Kenosha.

He was violated the citywide curfew and WI law that prohibits minors from carrying a long gun, except for 16 and 17 year olds with the express purpose of hunting. He had cleaned up graffiti and used his medic kit earlier in the day.

So you are saying that an illegal straw purchase and being in possession of a long gun (legal for hunting) in a riot zone is ok? So you are saying he was hunting (rioters)?

Because I don't think there are many deer in downtown Kenosha in the summertime, and besides, buck season is in the fall, not summer.

So...?

He stated that he was there to protect a business……why are struggling to understand that?

No one gave him the authority to do so. We don’t have vigilante justice. We have cops there to do that. He was adding to the problem and killed two people.

The cops weren’t very effective at protecting businesses during the riots. Was he playing out some wannabe cop fantasy…….of course. Did he deserved to be attacked……of course not.

Sorry, no that’s not how it works. The cops were doing their jobs. Rittenhouse wasn’t hired to be a cop, wasn’t trained to be a cop, and had no business being there. He is just as bad as the rest but also worse because he killed two and wounded one.

Actually that’s exactly how it works. If the police are unable to provide protection to your property you have every right to solicit volunteers to act as deterrents. Two people chose to attack and initiated a string of events that led to their demise. It’s pretty straightforward.

I agree, next!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the fixation here about the whole “Rittenhouse crossed STATE LINES!!!”

I mean, lefties just keep telling us that borders aren’t real. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.

Ok, fine. You win. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.


So what’s the big deal then? He crossed an imaginary line on a map.

And?

HUMANS AREN’T ILLEGAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the fixation here about the whole “Rittenhouse crossed STATE LINES!!!”

I mean, lefties just keep telling us that borders aren’t real. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.

Ok, fine. You win. They’re just imaginary lines on a map.


So what’s the big deal then? He crossed an imaginary line on a map.

And?

State lines matter because part of the issue was how he came to possess the gun in the first place.

And you are really reaching with the whole imaginary lines on a map thing.