Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Well, Elon is neurodivergent, what do you expect? My husband is neurodivergent, as is our neighbor, and they both have crazy ideas sometimes, that their wives need to persuade them are NOT workable.

I can well believe that Elon has a high IQ and Asperger's, as he says. And that this combo gives him both strengths and weaknesses: a single-minded focus to make his companies profitable; a stream of out-of-the-box ideas, some of which will be genius, and the rest complete garbage; and an inability to empathize and see other people's point of view, unless, as the person says, it's presented in a very specific way that triggers a response.

My husband and my neighbor are similar. And they're not as wealthy, so all-in-all... Elon isn't that bad

Elon’s greatest success story was coming out of his extremely wealthy mother’s vagina. He has a lot of “single minded focus”, but let’s face it, his companies can’t produce. Vision means nothing when your car blows up a person’s house or your rocket is no more reliable than the 1960s era technology it replaced.

Sure, Elon has had no meaningful success since birth. Hope you’re happy in your mother’s basement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Read this

If Yoloking says it, it must be gospel

Seriously. This site is trafficked by people with no critical thinking skills.

Says the person who can’t figure out that Yoloking posted a link, and was not the actual author of that content

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Well, Elon is neurodivergent, what do you expect? My husband is neurodivergent, as is our neighbor, and they both have crazy ideas sometimes, that their wives need to persuade them are NOT workable.

I can well believe that Elon has a high IQ and Asperger's, as he says. And that this combo gives him both strengths and weaknesses: a single-minded focus to make his companies profitable; a stream of out-of-the-box ideas, some of which will be genius, and the rest complete garbage; and an inability to empathize and see other people's point of view, unless, as the person says, it's presented in a very specific way that triggers a response.

My husband and my neighbor are similar. And they're not as wealthy, so all-in-all... Elon isn't that bad

Elon’s greatest success story was coming out of his extremely wealthy mother’s vagina. He has a lot of “single minded focus”, but let’s face it, his companies can’t produce. Vision means nothing when your car blows up a person’s house or your rocket is no more reliable than the 1960s era technology it replaced.

Sure, Elon has had no meaningful success since birth. Hope you’re happy in your mother’s basement.

He’s had more success when he hires smart people with his mom’s and borrowed money and gets out of the way. Even then, problems abound with the product. Don’t a fanboy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Well, Elon is neurodivergent, what do you expect? My husband is neurodivergent, as is our neighbor, and they both have crazy ideas sometimes, that their wives need to persuade them are NOT workable.

I can well believe that Elon has a high IQ and Asperger's, as he says. And that this combo gives him both strengths and weaknesses: a single-minded focus to make his companies profitable; a stream of out-of-the-box ideas, some of which will be genius, and the rest complete garbage; and an inability to empathize and see other people's point of view, unless, as the person says, it's presented in a very specific way that triggers a response.

My husband and my neighbor are similar. And they're not as wealthy, so all-in-all... Elon isn't that bad

Genuine question: why are you married to someone who is incapable of empathy and can't see your point of view? Sounds like a stressful life to choose

PP you replied to. He actually does, and I'm sure Elon does too, but not in a predictable way. Yes, it can lead to conflict. On the other hand, my husband has many positive traits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Read this

This sounds exactly like someone else we all know

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Read this

If Yoloking says it, it must be gospel

Seriously. This site is trafficked by people with no critical thinking skills.

Says the person who can’t figure out that Yoloking posted a link, and was not the actual author of that content

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Read this

This sounds exactly like someone else we all know

No, no it doesn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Read this

This sounds exactly like someone else we all know

No, no it doesn't.

Oh yes it does. In that person’s case he had multiple chiefs of staff who were tasked with managing him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Employees at Twitter were engaged in sabotage. I saw porn accounts put into my timeline.

Why do you assume it’s sabotage? It’s more likely that there are no employees left at Twitter performing the function that would have stopped that from happening.

Because normally the those spots on the timeline would be filled with people who are similar to people that I follow, or something Twitter was pushing. This was deliberate sabotage by an employee.

Uh. That's not how it worked. It's unlikely you were sabotaged by an employee. You were probably hacked. Change your passwords and turn on 2-factor authentication.

‘That’s not how it worked’ from someone who has a rudimentary idea of anything IT. The poster who had the porn flooding their account was not hacked, because the porn was not being SENT by THEIR account. They were receiving it from OTHER accounts, who might have been hacked or newly creative accounts.

I don't think I was receiving from other accounts either. They were being placed in the suggestions by Twitter section.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Employees at Twitter were engaged in sabotage. I saw porn accounts put into my timeline.

Why do you assume it’s sabotage? It’s more likely that there are no employees left at Twitter performing the function that would have stopped that from happening.

Because normally the those spots on the timeline would be filled with people who are similar to people that I follow, or something Twitter was pushing. This was deliberate sabotage by an employee.

Uh. That's not how it worked. It's unlikely you were sabotaged by an employee. You were probably hacked. Change your passwords and turn on 2-factor authentication.

I don't think I was personally sabotaged. Rather an employee started pushing these accounts. Someone else posted here they had the same experience.

[Anonymous]

This has nothing to do with Elon's management style.
Certain people want to control the flow of information, and don't like that Elon is not 100% on board with their censorship. He bought the platform after Babylon Bee was suspended.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This has nothing to do with Elon's management style.
Certain people want to control the flow of information, and don't like that Elon is not 100% on board with their censorship. He bought the platform after Babylon Bee was suspended.

Elon has proven he’s not very good at business management on his own. He’s tanking multiple companies and can’t stop himself from doing even more stupid shit, all because the cool people laugh at him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This has nothing to do with Elon's management style.
Certain people want to control the flow of information, and don't like that Elon is not 100% on board with their censorship. He bought the platform after Babylon Bee was suspended.

You are using a jumbled mess of Orwellian doublespeak designed to stoke fear. You could reverse your statement with Elon as the person who wants to control the flow of information and it would be an objectively accurate statement. In the end it comes down to which side you want to be on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This has nothing to do with Elon's management style.
Certain people want to control the flow of information, and don't like that Elon is not 100% on board with their censorship. He bought the platform after Babylon Bee was suspended.

You are using a jumbled mess of Orwellian doublespeak designed to stoke fear. You could reverse your statement with Elon as the person who wants to control the flow of information and it would be an objectively accurate statement. In the end it comes down to which side you want to be on.

Elon does not control what happens on Facebook, Instagram, etc. Meanwhile, people are talking about having Google and Apple drop twitter from their app stores if Elon doesn't go along with the desired moderation policies.

[Anonymous]

This guy sure casually lies a lot. Just like he lied about having a (STEM) bachelor's from Penn and "founding" Tesla.