Elon Musk buys $3 billion stake (9.2%) in Twitter and is now the platform's largest shareholder

[Anonymous]

Haven’t seen a thread on this but this is interesting news. Musk calls himself a free speech absolutist and has expressed his dismay over Twitter censorship for a while. Will Trump be reinstated? [twitter] https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1510952904009695240?s=21&t=IORZHgFnuSj_JR3lk0ZlCA[/twitter]

[Anonymous]

He’ll shill Dogecoin with it and make billions more.

[Anonymous]

Good. Maybe he can eventually bring about some much needed changes.

[Anonymous]

I hope he’s a good influence. Maybe the Babylon Bee will get their account back now.

[Anonymous]

Looks like he is already making improvements. LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like he is already making improvements. LOL.

So eager to want a narrative to be true that you fell for a shitposting satirist.

[Anonymous]

Shouldn't all Americans be free speech absolutists?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn't all Americans be free speech absolutists?

You already know free speech has limits. Why feign stupidity?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope he’s a good influence. Maybe the Babylon Bee will get their account back now.

Omg. Did they get suspended?

That is the funniest thing I’ve ever heard coming from Babylon Bee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn't all Americans be free speech absolutists?

Agree. Many on the previously liberal left have given up on it though. If you can’t win with arguments, you silence your opposition. Nothing new.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn't all Americans be free speech absolutists?

You already know free speech has limits. Why feign stupidity?

Within those limits, obvi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn't all Americans be free speech absolutists?

You already know free speech has limits. Why feign stupidity?

Tell us, oh Wise One - how do you define those limits?

Let me guess: “anything and everything I disagree with”, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn't all Americans be free speech absolutists?

You already know free speech has limits. Why feign stupidity?

Tell us, oh Wise One - how do you define those limits?

Let me guess: “anything and everything I disagree with”, right?

Actually, the supreme court has been quite clear about those limits over the years. The current policies in place by the vast majority of tech companies grossly exceed the limits defined by the supreme court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn't all Americans be free speech absolutists?

You already know free speech has limits. Why feign stupidity?

Tell us, oh Wise One - how do you define those limits?

Let me guess: “anything and everything I disagree with”, right?

Actually, the supreme court has been quite clear about those limits over the years. The current policies in place by the vast majority of tech companies grossly exceed the limits defined by the supreme court.

Because tech companies are not the government and have freedom themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn't all Americans be free speech absolutists?

You already know free speech has limits. Why feign stupidity?

Tell us, oh Wise One - how do you define those limits?

Let me guess: “anything and everything I disagree with”, right?

Actually, the supreme court has been quite clear about those limits over the years. The current policies in place by the vast majority of tech companies grossly exceed the limits defined by the supreme court.

Because tech companies are not the government and have freedom themselves.

No one never said they were the government or they didn’t have freedoms. I was responding to the previous comment about how limits of free speech are defined. Please at least make an attempt to stay on topic.