Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The punk put himself in a situation he couldn’t handle because he had no business going there to play out his vigilante fantasy. The police have to learn not to coddle right wing idiots who show up armed looking for an excuse to shoot a n-word.

+1
This is what Kyle was there for. For those who would say “BuT aLl HiS victims were White;” don’t overlook what panic does to a brain. He didn’t get the victims he wanted, but he sure made plenty of trouble.

How is Rittenhouse a white supremacist when the first person he shot was a skinhead looking serial child molester who was running around in a rage screaming n words on tape that night who cornered him after chasing him into a used car lot?

I swear there is a direct correlation between one’s opinion of this trial if you either watched the live streams of the event that night and/or watched the trial and the one’s who are only forming their opinions off of disingenuous, misinformed hot takes from Twitter. Watch all the live streams that night or watch the trial and then come back to the thread with your opinion.

You are a white supremacist when you associate with Proud Boys and Boogaloo Boys.

Boogaloo Boys are anarchists and made up of left wing and right wing elelements. The Proud Boys are led now by a black man named Enrique Tarrio and have extensive numbers of black and brown members. They also have a chapter in Tel Aviv, which is very odd for a white supremacist group to have an Jewish chapter in Israel. They also didn’t participate in Charlottsville because they didn’t like the real white supremacists and Nazis there. Their founder, Gavin Mcinness, actually fought white supremacists because they were upset that the Proud Boys were kicking actual white supremacists from their ranks.

https://archive.thinkprogress.org/proud-boys-founder-tries-and-fails-to-distance-itself-from-charlottesville-6862fb8b3ae9/

When you call everything and everyone a white supremacist it has the effect of lessening the meaning of the word so when actual white supremacists like Richard Spencer, Jason Kessler, and David Duke need to be labeled as such it doesn’t have the same meaning it used to have. Facts, words, and nuance still matter to some people though.

The Proud Boys’ actions belie their disavowals of bigotry: Rank-and-file Proud Boys and leaders regularly spout white nationalist memes and maintain affiliations with known extremists. They are known for anti-Muslim and misogynistic rhetoric. Proud Boys have appeared alongside other hate groups at extremist gatherings such as the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. Former Proud Boys member Jason Kessler helped organize that event, which brought together a broad coalition of extremists including Neo-Nazis, antisemites and militias. Kessler was expelled from the group after the violence and near-universal condemnation of Charlottesville rallygoers.

Other hardcore members of the alt-right have argued that the “Western chauvinist” label is just a “PR cuck term” McInnes crafted to gain mainstream acceptance. “Let’s not bullshit,” Brian Brathovd, aka Caerulus Rex, told his co-hosts on “The Daily Shoah,” an antisemitic podcast popular with the alt-right. If the Proud Boys “were pressed on the issue, I guarantee you that like 90% of them would tell you something along the lines of ‘Hitler was right. Gas the Jews.’”

White nationalists and neo-Nazis themselves have cited McInnes as a gateway to the alt-right. On “The Southern AF Podcast,” one former Proud Boy who went on to embrace white nationalism said he was originally drawn to the group because of its “pro-white sentiment.” “All his jokes, all his content when I first started listening to him,” he said of McInnes, “was all freakin’ alt-right stuff and racial issues and funny, comedic ways to like try to point out that white civilization has been superior.” Many Proud Boys like him have moved on to more extreme groups and ideologies.[/quote]

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/proud-boys

[Anonymous]

They are going to burn Kenosha again unless Rittenhouse gets convicted, and this time they will burn it to the ground. every inch of it.

If he is convicted then there will be no violence; nothing will happen.

[Anonymous]

I thought the prosecutors did a great job of exposing the judge's inherent biases in this case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The New York Times is all in on the rigging; in their case, it’s the court of public opinion. Never doubt that the NYT carries the GOP’s water for them.

Here’s the reality.

Seems as if someone from the NYTimes has actually watched the trial.
And, it seems as if you haven't.

Fill us in, then. What's inaccurate or misleading about the second picture?

Any still shot from that night can be taken out of context and that is precisely what "The Clear Cider" has done.
Truth is that Rittenhouse DID have a medical kit with him - testimony proves that. So does actual video of the night.
And, as for the last comment in this twitterer's tweet, it makes me believe that had this been two men of color, this particular twitterer would have a totally different opinion of the guilt/innocence of the people pictured. Amazing how that works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The New York Times is all in on the rigging; in their case, it’s the court of public opinion. Never doubt that the NYT carries the GOP’s water for them.

Here’s the reality.

Seems as if someone from the NYTimes has actually watched the trial.
And, it seems as if you haven't.

Fill us in, then. What's inaccurate or misleading about the second picture?

Any still shot from that night can be taken out of context and that is precisely what "The Clear Cider" has done.
Truth is that Rittenhouse DID have a medical kit with him - testimony proves that. So does actual video of the night.
And, as for the last comment in this twitterer's tweet, it makes me believe that had this been two men of color, this particular twitterer would have a totally different opinion of the guilt/innocence of the people pictured. Amazing how that works.

So the picture itself, the only thing wrong with it is that it makes KR look bad. Other than that, it's a real picture from that night?

[Anonymous]

Am I the only one who thinks that Kyle’s beliefs and background have literally nothing to do with this trial?

[Anonymous]

The Senate sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Tuesday requesting information about how the FBI uses surveillance aircraft during riots and protests and what it does with the footage.

..

The Kenosha footage is now being used as prosecutorial evidence in the criminal trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, raising questions about how the FBI preserves surveillance video and uses it.

“Given the FBI’s apparent use of surveillance aircraft during protests and unrest throughout the country, it is unclear how the FBI monitors those situations, how it preserves the footage from those aircraft, how it uses that footage, and whether the footage is captured at different quality levels,” the senate wrote in his letter.

The Senate’s questions for Wray include how the FBI determines when and where to monitor potential unrest and how many aircraft to use, who exactly is responsible for monitoring the video, how the FBI shares its video with local law enforcement, and what the FBI does if its aircraft spot a crime happening. Johnson also inquired about whether the FBI records its footage at different levels of video quality and how it preserves the video it captures.

..
Defense attorney Mark Richards said the FBI has so far refused attempts to access “the rest” of the footage, at one point reportedly telling the defense it doesn’t exist anymore.

“I can’t believe the FBI is doing surveillance of multiple homicides and gets rid of the video. That’s preposterous,” Richards said.

[Anonymous]

Oh well if you quote the obviously completely unbiased, objective SPLC…

Keep in mind that that SPLC story directly contradicts the Think Progress story, which is obviously a left leaning outlet that conceded that the Proud Boys officially distanced themselves from white supremacists and Charlottsville. Gavin Mcinness was telling all of the Proud Boys to disavow everything related to the Charlottsville rally days before it happened. This is from the Intercept, another left wing outlet.

https://theintercept.com/2017/09/21/gavin-mcinnes-alt-right-proud-boys-richard-spencer-charlottesville/

The Proud Boys, a drinking club of male, far-right street brawlers, who purport to defend “Western values,” are routinely associated with the “alt-right.” But the group’s leader, Gavin McInnes, who helped launch Vice Media in 1994 and now runs a right-wing YouTube talk show, has in fact rejected the term for some time, preferring the milder-sounding “alt-light.” McInnes’s insistence that the Proud Boys have nothing to do with the “alt-right” grew even more adamant after the violence in Charlottesville. Last month, in a blog post titled “WE ARE NOT ALT-RIGHT,” he alerted his group that “alt-right” members planned to “infiltrate” Proud Boys meetings and “sabotage” them.

The same can be said about calling anarchist losers like Antifa leftists when in reality they could not be further from actual communists or socialists. Antifa members would get locked up in an actual leftist country like China.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought the prosecutors did a great job of exposing the judge's inherent biases in this case.

Then you weren’t paying attention. The prosecutor is either profoundly incompetent or is deliberately angling for a mistrial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the prosecutors did a great job of exposing the judge's inherent biases in this case.

Then you weren’t paying attention. The prosecutor is either profoundly incompetent or is deliberately angling for a mistrial.

Yes. And the same goes for the judge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks that Kyle’s beliefs and background have literally nothing to do with this trial?

They have everything to do with this trial. Why else would the pig drive to another state armed?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The punk put himself in a situation he couldn’t handle because he had no business going there to play out his vigilante fantasy. The police have to learn not to coddle right wing idiots who show up armed looking for an excuse to shoot a n-word.

+1
This is what Kyle was there for. For those who would say “BuT aLl HiS victims were White;” don’t overlook what panic does to a brain. He didn’t get the victims he wanted, but he sure made plenty of trouble.

How is Rittenhouse a white supremacist when the first person he shot was a skinhead looking serial child molester who was running around in a rage screaming n words on tape that night who cornered him after chasing him into a used car lot?

I swear there is a direct correlation between one’s opinion of this trial if you either watched the live streams of the event that night and/or watched the trial and the one’s who are only forming their opinions off of disingenuous, misinformed hot takes from Twitter. Watch all the live streams that night or watch the trial and then come back to the thread with your opinion.

You are a white supremacist when you associate with Proud Boys and Boogaloo Boys.

Boogaloo Boys are anarchists and made up of left wing and right wing elelements. The Proud Boys are led now by a black man named Enrique Tarrio and have extensive numbers of black and brown members. They also have a chapter in Tel Aviv, which is very odd for a white supremacist group to have an Jewish chapter in Israel. They also didn’t participate in Charlottsville because they didn’t like the real white supremacists and Nazis there. Their founder, Gavin Mcinness, actually fought white supremacists because they were upset that the Proud Boys were kicking actual white supremacists from their ranks.

https://archive.thinkprogress.org/proud-boys-founder-tries-and-fails-to-distance-itself-from-charlottesville-6862fb8b3ae9/

When you call everything and everyone a white supremacist it has the effect of lessening the meaning of the word so when actual white supremacists like Richard Spencer, Jason Kessler, and David Duke need to be labeled as such it doesn’t have the same meaning it used to have. Facts, words, and nuance still matter to some people though.

You really can’t be this ignorant. Please stop with the spin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks that Kyle’s beliefs and background have literally nothing to do with this trial?

They have everything to do with this trial. Why else would the pig drive to another state armed?!

I thought he was on trial to determine if he shot in self defense. Which, according to the evidence, looks like he did. I think if he was running around picking people off randomly it would have more bearing on the trial. But that’s not what happened here.

[Anonymous]

The SJW narrative is right here in this thread:

"He's a white supremacist who went to Kenosha to shoot some blacks."

Except that's not what the evidence says, except here on DCUM where the twisting in the wind to make things fit is astronomical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks that Kyle’s beliefs and background have literally nothing to do with this trial?

They have everything to do with this trial. Why else would the pig drive to another state armed?!

He crossed state lines to go from his mother’s house in IL to go to his father’s house in Kenosha, WI. The weapon didn’t cross state lines and was provided to Kyle in Kenosha.

He was violated the citywide curfew and WI law that prohibits minors from carrying a long gun, except for 16 and 17 year olds with the express purpose of hunting. He had cleaned up graffiti and used his medic kit earlier in the day.