Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:



Oh but he isn’t a white supremacist according to his lying troll mother, who apparently is incapable of raising a decent human being. Shame on her.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He’s only 17. What type of parent f#cked up this badly? Who lets their kid travel across state lines and have access to militia equipment?

This is so sick. I’m a white man, but white culture is responsible for this boy.


You are a stupid man to even comment like that.


No, they're exactly right. Not sure why you can't admit that and can only attack them.


I haven’t watched much of the trial, but from what I’ve read, KR’s parents are divorced and his mom lived in Antioch, IL, and his dad lived in Kenosha, WI, as did numerous other relatives. KR’s mom drove him across state lines in what could have been a routine custody exchange. The weapon didn’t cross state lines. It was provided to KR in by someone WI.

However, KR’s mom is the one who took him to a bar to share some beers (still underage, but lawful because he was accompanied by her) with a group of Proud Boys, wearing his “free as f**k” t-shirt and flashing the white supremacist OK sign for photos, while he was awaiting trial. There are definitely some issues with her parenting.


I tracked down an interview with her from last year and I honestly think she may be developmentally disabled. I'm not saying they shouldn't be parents but I think she was ill equipped to handle a deceptive teenaged boy. By deceptive I mean him giving another adult the money to buy him an AR-15. He kept the gun at that adult's home. What mother allows her high school child to go spend the night with a grown adult man who is not a relative? I bet Kyle files for SSDI due to the PTSD he will suffer from shooting people as soon as mommy finishes spending the millions they raised from right wing donors. We will be carrying this little freak the rest of his miserable life.



Agree because smart, they are not. They’re murderous white trash embracing white supremacy. It also bothers me that the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorneys seem to be too. Note to self: never move to their town.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I didn't see any ANTIFA wielding automatic weapons. Just the underage right wing supremicist.


Automatic weapons were banned in the 30s
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I didn't see any ANTIFA wielding automatic weapons. Just the underage right wing supremicist.


Automatic weapons were banned in the 30s



We know who the problem is in America. It’s the white supremacists that are a huge problem and are terrorists.
Anonymous
Agree because smart, they are not. They’re murderous white trash embracing white supremacy. It also bothers me that the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorneys seem to be too. Note to self: never move to their town.


When you try to make an argument that people are "white supremacists" simply because you don't like the way this trial is going, you prove that the term "white supremacist" no longer holds any meaning.
I am sure these folks are happy that you never plan to move there. They don't need bigoted people who disparage them for no reason in their presence.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Agree because smart, they are not. They’re murderous white trash embracing white supremacy. It also bothers me that the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorneys seem to be too. Note to self: never move to their town.


When you try to make an argument that people are "white supremacists" simply because you don't like the way this trial is going, you prove that the term "white supremacist" no longer holds any meaning.
I am sure these folks are happy that you never plan to move there. They don't need bigoted people who disparage them for no reason in their presence.


DP. In their presence? You think the judge, prosecutor and defense attorney are here reading DCUM?
Anonymous
The New York Times is all in on the rigging; in their case, it’s the court of public opinion. Never doubt that the NYT carries the GOP’s water for them.


Here’s the reality.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The New York Times is all in on the rigging; in their case, it’s the court of public opinion. Never doubt that the NYT carries the GOP’s water for them.


Here’s the reality.


Seems as if someone from the NYTimes has actually watched the trial.
And, it seems as if you haven't.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The punk put himself in a situation he couldn’t handle because he had no business going there to play out his vigilante fantasy. The police have to learn not to coddle right wing idiots who show up armed looking for an excuse to shoot a n-word.

+1
This is what Kyle was there for. For those who would say “BuT aLl HiS victims were White;” don’t overlook what panic does to a brain. He didn’t get the victims he wanted, but he sure made plenty of trouble.


How is Rittenhouse a white supremacist when the first person he shot was a skinhead looking serial child molester who was running around in a rage screaming n words on tape that night who cornered him after chasing him into a used car lot?

I swear there is a direct correlation between one’s opinion of this trial if you either watched the live streams of the event that night and/or watched the trial and the one’s who are only forming their opinions off of disingenuous, misinformed hot takes from Twitter. Watch all the live streams that night or watch the trial and then come back to the thread with your opinion.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Agree because smart, they are not. They’re murderous white trash embracing white supremacy. It also bothers me that the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorneys seem to be too. Note to self: never move to their town.


When you try to make an argument that people are "white supremacists" simply because you don't like the way this trial is going, you prove that the term "white supremacist" no longer holds any meaning.
I am sure these folks are happy that you never plan to move there. They don't need bigoted people who disparage them for no reason in their presence.


Hanging out with proud boys and flashing the white supremacy symbol means you’re a white supremacist without a trial or arrest!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The New York Times is all in on the rigging; in their case, it’s the court of public opinion. Never doubt that the NYT carries the GOP’s water for them.


Here’s the reality.


Seems as if someone from the NYTimes has actually watched the trial.
And, it seems as if you haven't.


Fill us in, then. What's inaccurate or misleading about the second picture?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The punk put himself in a situation he couldn’t handle because he had no business going there to play out his vigilante fantasy. The police have to learn not to coddle right wing idiots who show up armed looking for an excuse to shoot a n-word.

+1
This is what Kyle was there for. For those who would say “BuT aLl HiS victims were White;” don’t overlook what panic does to a brain. He didn’t get the victims he wanted, but he sure made plenty of trouble.


How is Rittenhouse a white supremacist when the first person he shot was a skinhead looking serial child molester who was running around in a rage screaming n words on tape that night who cornered him after chasing him into a used car lot?

I swear there is a direct correlation between one’s opinion of this trial if you either watched the live streams of the event that night and/or watched the trial and the one’s who are only forming their opinions off of disingenuous, misinformed hot takes from Twitter. Watch all the live streams that night or watch the trial and then come back to the thread with your opinion.


You are a white supremacist when you associate with Proud Boys and Boogaloo Boys.
Anonymous
Nazi? These people embrace the Nazis that’s why they are out there. Glad that you acknowledge that people that embrace Nazis are psychopaths.

Rittenhouse is a psycho lock him up.

What is ironic is just how far removed these people
are from the Nazi ideal, based on physicality, brain power, and presentation alone. On Jan 6, even Trump was disappointed to find out how “low class” his true believers were that day. Which is saying something. Which is sort of the point really these people have no place in this country. That’s what they are railing against. Either way he won’t make it much last 50, he’ll off himself way before then.

If this is the best and the brightest well then. That dog has no hunt and your laments are nothing more than proof that a hurt dog will holler.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The punk put himself in a situation he couldn’t handle because he had no business going there to play out his vigilante fantasy. The police have to learn not to coddle right wing idiots who show up armed looking for an excuse to shoot a n-word.

+1
This is what Kyle was there for. For those who would say “BuT aLl HiS victims were White;” don’t overlook what panic does to a brain. He didn’t get the victims he wanted, but he sure made plenty of trouble.


How is Rittenhouse a white supremacist when the first person he shot was a skinhead looking serial child molester who was running around in a rage screaming n words on tape that night who cornered him after chasing him into a used car lot?

I swear there is a direct correlation between one’s opinion of this trial if you either watched the live streams of the event that night and/or watched the trial and the one’s who are only forming their opinions off of disingenuous, misinformed hot takes from Twitter. Watch all the live streams that night or watch the trial and then come back to the thread with your opinion.


You are a white supremacist when you associate with Proud Boys and Boogaloo Boys.


Boogaloo Boys are anarchists and made up of left wing and right wing elelements. The Proud Boys are led now by a black man named Enrique Tarrio and have extensive numbers of black and brown members. They also have a chapter in Tel Aviv, which is very odd for a white supremacist group to have an Jewish chapter in Israel. They also didn’t participate in Charlottsville because they didn’t like the real white supremacists and Nazis there. Their founder, Gavin Mcinness, actually fought white supremacists because they were upset that the Proud Boys were kicking actual white supremacists from their ranks.

https://archive.thinkprogress.org/proud-boys-founder-tries-and-fails-to-distance-itself-from-charlottesville-6862fb8b3ae9/

When you call everything and everyone a white supremacist it has the effect of lessening the meaning of the word so when actual white supremacists like Richard Spencer, Jason Kessler, and David Duke need to be labeled as such it doesn’t have the same meaning it used to have. Facts, words, and nuance still matter to some people though.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The punk put himself in a situation he couldn’t handle because he had no business going there to play out his vigilante fantasy. The police have to learn not to coddle right wing idiots who show up armed looking for an excuse to shoot a n-word.

+1
This is what Kyle was there for. For those who would say “BuT aLl HiS victims were White;” don’t overlook what panic does to a brain. He didn’t get the victims he wanted, but he sure made plenty of trouble.


How is Rittenhouse a white supremacist when the first person he shot was a skinhead looking serial child molester who was running around in a rage screaming n words on tape that night who cornered him after chasing him into a used car lot?

I swear there is a direct correlation between one’s opinion of this trial if you either watched the live streams of the event that night and/or watched the trial and the one’s who are only forming their opinions off of disingenuous, misinformed hot takes from Twitter. Watch all the live streams that night or watch the trial and then come back to the thread with your opinion.


You are a white supremacist when you associate with Proud Boys and Boogaloo Boys.


Boogaloo Boys are anarchists and made up of left wing and right wing elelements. The Proud Boys are led now by a black man named Enrique Tarrio and have extensive numbers of black and brown members. They also have a chapter in Tel Aviv, which is very odd for a white supremacist group to have an Jewish chapter in Israel. They also didn’t participate in Charlottsville because they didn’t like the real white supremacists and Nazis there. Their founder, Gavin Mcinness, actually fought white supremacists because they were upset that the Proud Boys were kicking actual white supremacists from their ranks.

https://archive.thinkprogress.org/proud-boys-founder-tries-and-fails-to-distance-itself-from-charlottesville-6862fb8b3ae9/

When you call everything and everyone a white supremacist it has the effect of lessening the meaning of the word so when actual white supremacists like Richard Spencer, Jason Kessler, and David Duke need to be labeled as such it doesn’t have the same meaning it used to have. Facts, words, and nuance still matter to some people though.


In February, Canada added three right-wing groups to its list of terrorist entities. Included on that list, the Proud Boys. And that's an organization founded in 2016 by a Canadian living in the U.S. While the Canadian government said its investigations predated the January attack on the U.S. Capitol, the designation is highlighting Canada's different approach to confronting far-right groups. Here is Emma Jacobs.

EMMA JACOBS, BYLINE: Canada's public safety minister, Bill Blair, announced the addition of the Proud Boys and two neo-Nazi networks, Atomwaffen and The Base, to Canada's terror entity list. The designation a few months ago, alongside groups like ISIS and al-Qaida, didn't make membership illegal, but Blair said...


https://www.npr.org/2021/05/02/992846086/proud-boys-named-terrorist-entity-in-canada
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: