With Love, Meghan on Netflix

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her jam is $30 a jar. Does she think she's Erewhon?

Alllll the obsessed haters will be buying it for their YouTube channels and twitter clout. “I found a hair in my jam!” “It tastes like their non-existent kids mashed it with their dirty hands!”

I think literally zero people will buy it and it will all spoil in whatever warehouse it’s in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What matters in the USA is what is on your Real ID.

Her real name is not even Meghan. It’s Rachel

Omg I didn’t know this! I bet she thought Rachel was too “white” sounding and it would ruin her phony race hustling grift.

She’s gone by Meghan since childhood. How is Meghan any less white of a name than Rachel? If that was her intention, why not just completely pick a new name like her half-sister did? Samantha’s birth name was Yvonne.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2025/03/blind-item-14_0480785027.html?m=1

Isn't her legal name Rachel Markle? Megan is her middle name. That's not really cosplaying.

The point is her legal name is not actually Sussex as was claimed in a huge moment on the show.

She didn't make any claim about her legal name, she just stated that she identifies as "Sussex" not Markle. And then provided an explanation as to why. The fact that some of you are flipping out about this says much more about you than her.

I don't even think it was a "huge moment" on the show. It was a very brief conversation. YOU have made it a huge moment because for some reason it's very important to you that Meghan be forced to use her maiden name forever even if she doesn't want to, which is deranged.

But it's not her maiden name, lol. It's her current legal name, and the name of her kids as well. They have "Markle" on their birth certificate. At no point did she ever change their name to Sussex, which would be very bizarre considering it's no one's legal name in the family.

It is definitively her maiden name. Some women keep their maiden name. It sounds like Meghan does not want to keep hers but that there may be an issue with what she changes it to because the naming conventions in her husband's family are weird.

But I don't think it would be "bizarre" in that situation to simply legally change everyone's last name to Sussex.

This is actually a relatable problem to me because I had issues with my name when I got married and it was also hard to get people to call me by my new name (hyphenated) because people are stubborn and weird. The whole thing winds up being political and annoying when, hello, it's my name and you should call me what I tell you my name is. I did ultimately change my name legally but it took a while and in the meantime, I 100% expected people to call me by my newly adopted name, not my maiden name. So I'm totally on Meghan's side here. It is not some "gotcha" that her chosen name may not be her legal name. That's paperwork. Call people what they ask to be called or GTFO.

In any case, it is her current name, and the current name of her children. There is no legal precedent for her to change her name to Sussex. Of course she could, in the same way I could march down to the courthouse and change mine to Sussex. But it would be pretty bizarre of both myself and MM to do that considering it's not our legal name in any sense.

No, it would be normal for the Duchess of Sussex to change her and her kid's legal US names to Sussex as a way to simplify their names. People often make choices like this when navigating marital name conflicts or immigration naming issues.

It would be totally deranged for you to do so, as you are not the Duchess of Sussex.

I think this is why you are so mad, actually.

Considering that Sussex is NOT a last name and the name of a geographical area, yes it would be pretty deranged. But yeah, maybe everyone should just change their name to it and we can all have a good laugh.

The point is Meghan herself claimed that her name is Sussex. But ahe apparently does not use the name legally? It is very weird. I am going to change my name to "Princess Diana" but not legally. It will just be the name I declare for myself.

The difference here is that Meghan legally owns a title, the Duchess of Sussex, and many other people who have had the titles Duke of and Duchess of have used the house name as their surname, so Meghan does as well. Whereas you are not a Princess and your name is not Diana. So what Meghan is doing is normal and in keeping with the traditions of her husband's family, whereas you calling yourself Princess Diana would be psychotic.

And again, I think that's what bothers you. Meghan is actually entitled to style herself as Meghan Sussex because she is, in fact, the Duchess of Sussex. Just as other members of that family have done for years. But you aren't entitled to do so because you aren't a Duchess. This obviously makes you very, very mad for some reason.

OK I understand being entitled to use a name. I am married and could use my husband's name, but my legal name is still my maiden name. I do nor go around correcting people and saying my husband's name is my actual name. The reason I don't do that is his name is not my actual, legal name.

So the point remains that "Sussex" is not her legal name according to any documents. Her legal name is "Markle." So she lied about her name being Sussex. The point of lying was to have a "gotcha" moment with Mindy Kaling.

Lied about her name? Are you insane? EVERYONE knows her name. Meghan Markle Sussex whatever has out white womaned (yes made this up), white women. She is able to live the most white womanly life ever, while still enjoying the benefits being a POC. It is driving some of you crazy. Let this woman live.

Honey, what you don't get is that she doesn't want to live - she wants an audience and applause. She is addicted to attention.

Honey , let’s say that’s true. Why are the haters giving it to her? Why not just ignore her? Most actors want an audience and applause, why is her craving it so unique? That’s what’s weird here. Plenty of celebrities do exactly what she’s doing, but don’t garner nearly the same hate? Why is that? Genuinely curious. What about her perceived “addiction to attention” make white women so angry? Singly out white women, because no other race of women GAF about her or whatever it is she’s doing.


The obvious answer is her race. Why? Because plenty of women of both races do what she’s doing to gain fame and fortune, but of none of them is a black woman who married the most eligible man in the planet (at that time).

No, it's not obviously race. It's that she contradicts herself constantly and she is not genuine. That's it.

You've described 99% of all celebrities. That's why we all think it's just racism. Because nothing else explains this bizarre obsession with someone so irrelevant. Why is she such a lightening rod? It is bizarre. Everyone in the royal family is pointless and weird, but only Meghan inspires this level of hate.

It's the whining. Most people can't listen to that level of martyrdom from a semi-successful actress who then married a prince. If she was suffering verbal or emotional abuse, by all means get out of the UK and strike out on your own. But average people aren't receptive to someone like that complaining over and over again. It's too much.

Forgive me if I'm missing something, but when people talk about her whining over and over, what does this refer to? The Oprah interview? I admit I only watched like 10 minutes of it but it didn't come off as whiny to me. Has she given other interviews? The only other public statement I know of on the matter was Harry's book, but that's him, not her, right?

I don't follow her closely and just watched a few episodes of this show and thought it was okay, not amazing. She is awkward and it seems a bit forced but the show is very pretty and some of the ideas are good. Has she done a bunch of interviews where she complains about stuff with his family? Is she still talking about it in interviews? I honestly don't now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What matters in the USA is what is on your Real ID.

Her real name is not even Meghan. It’s Rachel

Omg I didn’t know this! I bet she thought Rachel was too “white” sounding and it would ruin her phony race hustling grift.

TIL Rachel is a "white" name and Meghan is a "Black" name. (Even though every Meghan I know of other than MM is white.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2025/03/blind-item-14_0480785027.html?m=1

Isn't her legal name Rachel Markle? Megan is her middle name. That's not really cosplaying.

The point is her legal name is not actually Sussex as was claimed in a huge moment on the show.

She didn't make any claim about her legal name, she just stated that she identifies as "Sussex" not Markle. And then provided an explanation as to why. The fact that some of you are flipping out about this says much more about you than her.

I don't even think it was a "huge moment" on the show. It was a very brief conversation. YOU have made it a huge moment because for some reason it's very important to you that Meghan be forced to use her maiden name forever even if she doesn't want to, which is deranged.

But it's not her maiden name, lol. It's her current legal name, and the name of her kids as well. They have "Markle" on their birth certificate. At no point did she ever change their name to Sussex, which would be very bizarre considering it's no one's legal name in the family.

It is definitively her maiden name. Some women keep their maiden name. It sounds like Meghan does not want to keep hers but that there may be an issue with what she changes it to because the naming conventions in her husband's family are weird.

But I don't think it would be "bizarre" in that situation to simply legally change everyone's last name to Sussex.

This is actually a relatable problem to me because I had issues with my name when I got married and it was also hard to get people to call me by my new name (hyphenated) because people are stubborn and weird. The whole thing winds up being political and annoying when, hello, it's my name and you should call me what I tell you my name is. I did ultimately change my name legally but it took a while and in the meantime, I 100% expected people to call me by my newly adopted name, not my maiden name. So I'm totally on Meghan's side here. It is not some "gotcha" that her chosen name may not be her legal name. That's paperwork. Call people what they ask to be called or GTFO.

In any case, it is her current name, and the current name of her children. There is no legal precedent for her to change her name to Sussex. Of course she could, in the same way I could march down to the courthouse and change mine to Sussex. But it would be pretty bizarre of both myself and MM to do that considering it's not our legal name in any sense.

No, it would be normal for the Duchess of Sussex to change her and her kid's legal US names to Sussex as a way to simplify their names. People often make choices like this when navigating marital name conflicts or immigration naming issues.

It would be totally deranged for you to do so, as you are not the Duchess of Sussex.

I think this is why you are so mad, actually.

Considering that Sussex is NOT a last name and the name of a geographical area, yes it would be pretty deranged. But yeah, maybe everyone should just change their name to it and we can all have a good laugh.

The point is Meghan herself claimed that her name is Sussex. But ahe apparently does not use the name legally? It is very weird. I am going to change my name to "Princess Diana" but not legally. It will just be the name I declare for myself.

The difference here is that Meghan legally owns a title, the Duchess of Sussex, and many other people who have had the titles Duke of and Duchess of have used the house name as their surname, so Meghan does as well. Whereas you are not a Princess and your name is not Diana. So what Meghan is doing is normal and in keeping with the traditions of her husband's family, whereas you calling yourself Princess Diana would be psychotic.

And again, I think that's what bothers you. Meghan is actually entitled to style herself as Meghan Sussex because she is, in fact, the Duchess of Sussex. Just as other members of that family have done for years. But you aren't entitled to do so because you aren't a Duchess. This obviously makes you very, very mad for some reason.

OK I understand being entitled to use a name. I am married and could use my husband's name, but my legal name is still my maiden name. I do nor go around correcting people and saying my husband's name is my actual name. The reason I don't do that is his name is not my actual, legal name.

So the point remains that "Sussex" is not her legal name according to any documents. Her legal name is "Markle." So she lied about her name being Sussex. The point of lying was to have a "gotcha" moment with Mindy Kaling.

Lied about her name? Are you insane? EVERYONE knows her name. Meghan Markle Sussex whatever has out white womaned (yes made this up), white women. She is able to live the most white womanly life ever, while still enjoying the benefits being a POC. It is driving some of you crazy. Let this woman live.

Honey, what you don't get is that she doesn't want to live - she wants an audience and applause. She is addicted to attention.

Honey , let’s say that’s true. Why are the haters giving it to her? Why not just ignore her? Most actors want an audience and applause, why is her craving it so unique? That’s what’s weird here. Plenty of celebrities do exactly what she’s doing, but don’t garner nearly the same hate? Why is that? Genuinely curious. What about her perceived “addiction to attention” make white women so angry? Singly out white women, because no other race of women GAF about her or whatever it is she’s doing.


The obvious answer is her race. Why? Because plenty of women of both races do what she’s doing to gain fame and fortune, but of none of them is a black woman who married the most eligible man in the planet (at that time).

No, it's not obviously race. It's that she contradicts herself constantly and she is not genuine. That's it.

You've described 99% of all celebrities. That's why we all think it's just racism. Because nothing else explains this bizarre obsession with someone so irrelevant. Why is she such a lightening rod? It is bizarre. Everyone in the royal family is pointless and weird, but only Meghan inspires this level of hate.

It's the whining. Most people can't listen to that level of martyrdom from a semi-successful actress who then married a prince. If she was suffering verbal or emotional abuse, by all means get out of the UK and strike out on your own. But average people aren't receptive to someone like that complaining over and over again. It's too much.

Forgive me if I'm missing something, but when people talk about her whining over and over, what does this refer to? The Oprah interview? I admit I only watched like 10 minutes of it but it didn't come off as whiny to me. Has she given other interviews? The only other public statement I know of on the matter was Harry's book, but that's him, not her, right?

I don't follow her closely and just watched a few episodes of this show and thought it was okay, not amazing. She is awkward and it seems a bit forced but the show is very pretty and some of the ideas are good. Has she done a bunch of interviews where she complains about stuff with his family? Is she still talking about it in interviews? I honestly don't now.

Oprah, the book, she mentioned it on her Africa charity tour, her People magazine interview promoting this new show alluded to it, the first episode of her show said Daniel was here for "the before, during, and after, shall we say." These are just a few examples. It comes up almost any time she has a public platform. I think if she would finally drop it, people would move on.

[Anonymous]

She brings up her woes in sly ways. It came up in ep 1 as stated above and in the whole you know I’m Sussex now exchange. Yet it seems a lot of her supporters take glee in “Kate Middleton” and “Wait-tee Kate-tee” as carefully enunciated by an infuriated and contemptuous Meghan on Oprah. She’s mad and pass-agg and controlling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2025/03/blind-item-14_0480785027.html?m=1

Isn't her legal name Rachel Markle? Megan is her middle name. That's not really cosplaying.

The point is her legal name is not actually Sussex as was claimed in a huge moment on the show.

She didn't make any claim about her legal name, she just stated that she identifies as "Sussex" not Markle. And then provided an explanation as to why. The fact that some of you are flipping out about this says much more about you than her.

I don't even think it was a "huge moment" on the show. It was a very brief conversation. YOU have made it a huge moment because for some reason it's very important to you that Meghan be forced to use her maiden name forever even if she doesn't want to, which is deranged.

But it's not her maiden name, lol. It's her current legal name, and the name of her kids as well. They have "Markle" on their birth certificate. At no point did she ever change their name to Sussex, which would be very bizarre considering it's no one's legal name in the family.

It is definitively her maiden name. Some women keep their maiden name. It sounds like Meghan does not want to keep hers but that there may be an issue with what she changes it to because the naming conventions in her husband's family are weird.

But I don't think it would be "bizarre" in that situation to simply legally change everyone's last name to Sussex.

This is actually a relatable problem to me because I had issues with my name when I got married and it was also hard to get people to call me by my new name (hyphenated) because people are stubborn and weird. The whole thing winds up being political and annoying when, hello, it's my name and you should call me what I tell you my name is. I did ultimately change my name legally but it took a while and in the meantime, I 100% expected people to call me by my newly adopted name, not my maiden name. So I'm totally on Meghan's side here. It is not some "gotcha" that her chosen name may not be her legal name. That's paperwork. Call people what they ask to be called or GTFO.

In any case, it is her current name, and the current name of her children. There is no legal precedent for her to change her name to Sussex. Of course she could, in the same way I could march down to the courthouse and change mine to Sussex. But it would be pretty bizarre of both myself and MM to do that considering it's not our legal name in any sense.

No, it would be normal for the Duchess of Sussex to change her and her kid's legal US names to Sussex as a way to simplify their names. People often make choices like this when navigating marital name conflicts or immigration naming issues.

It would be totally deranged for you to do so, as you are not the Duchess of Sussex.

I think this is why you are so mad, actually.

Considering that Sussex is NOT a last name and the name of a geographical area, yes it would be pretty deranged. But yeah, maybe everyone should just change their name to it and we can all have a good laugh.

The point is Meghan herself claimed that her name is Sussex. But ahe apparently does not use the name legally? It is very weird. I am going to change my name to "Princess Diana" but not legally. It will just be the name I declare for myself.

The difference here is that Meghan legally owns a title, the Duchess of Sussex, and many other people who have had the titles Duke of and Duchess of have used the house name as their surname, so Meghan does as well. Whereas you are not a Princess and your name is not Diana. So what Meghan is doing is normal and in keeping with the traditions of her husband's family, whereas you calling yourself Princess Diana would be psychotic.

And again, I think that's what bothers you. Meghan is actually entitled to style herself as Meghan Sussex because she is, in fact, the Duchess of Sussex. Just as other members of that family have done for years. But you aren't entitled to do so because you aren't a Duchess. This obviously makes you very, very mad for some reason.

OK I understand being entitled to use a name. I am married and could use my husband's name, but my legal name is still my maiden name. I do nor go around correcting people and saying my husband's name is my actual name. The reason I don't do that is his name is not my actual, legal name.

So the point remains that "Sussex" is not her legal name according to any documents. Her legal name is "Markle." So she lied about her name being Sussex. The point of lying was to have a "gotcha" moment with Mindy Kaling.

Lied about her name? Are you insane? EVERYONE knows her name. Meghan Markle Sussex whatever has out white womaned (yes made this up), white women. She is able to live the most white womanly life ever, while still enjoying the benefits being a POC. It is driving some of you crazy. Let this woman live.

Honey, what you don't get is that she doesn't want to live - she wants an audience and applause. She is addicted to attention.

Honey , let’s say that’s true. Why are the haters giving it to her? Why not just ignore her? Most actors want an audience and applause, why is her craving it so unique? That’s what’s weird here. Plenty of celebrities do exactly what she’s doing, but don’t garner nearly the same hate? Why is that? Genuinely curious. What about her perceived “addiction to attention” make white women so angry? Singly out white women, because no other race of women GAF about her or whatever it is she’s doing.


The obvious answer is her race. Why? Because plenty of women of both races do what she’s doing to gain fame and fortune, but of none of them is a black woman who married the most eligible man in the planet (at that time).

No, it's not obviously race. It's that she contradicts herself constantly and she is not genuine. That's it.

You've described 99% of all celebrities. That's why we all think it's just racism. Because nothing else explains this bizarre obsession with someone so irrelevant. Why is she such a lightening rod? It is bizarre. Everyone in the royal family is pointless and weird, but only Meghan inspires this level of hate.

It's the whining. Most people can't listen to that level of martyrdom from a semi-successful actress who then married a prince. If she was suffering verbal or emotional abuse, by all means get out of the UK and strike out on your own. But average people aren't receptive to someone like that complaining over and over again. It's too much.

Forgive me if I'm missing something, but when people talk about her whining over and over, what does this refer to? The Oprah interview? I admit I only watched like 10 minutes of it but it didn't come off as whiny to me. Has she given other interviews? The only other public statement I know of on the matter was Harry's book, but that's him, not her, right?

I don't follow her closely and just watched a few episodes of this show and thought it was okay, not amazing. She is awkward and it seems a bit forced but the show is very pretty and some of the ideas are good. Has she done a bunch of interviews where she complains about stuff with his family? Is she still talking about it in interviews? I honestly don't now.

Oprah, the book, she mentioned it on her Africa charity tour, her People magazine interview promoting this new show alluded to it, the first episode of her show said Daniel was here for "the before, during, and after, shall we say." These are just a few examples. It comes up almost any time she has a public platform. I think if she would finally drop it, people would move on.

I didn’t read Spare but didn’t dummy Harry claim he was ‘assaulted’ by his brother. How embarrassing for Harry to put that family dirty laundry in a tell all. Gross. And I thought he also claimed he’d told his therapist. But didn’t MM and he also claim that the BRF wouldn’t allow anyone to speak to mental health professionals? Which is it.

As a New Yorker, I’ll say their claims to have been chased and ‘endangered’ by paparazzi (a la Princess Di) through the streets of Manhattan was obviously a total lie from the get go. Could not have happened as they claimed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her jam is $30 a jar. Does she think she's Erewhon?

Alllll the obsessed haters will be buying it for their YouTube channels and twitter clout. “I found a hair in my jam!” “It tastes like their non-existent kids mashed it with their dirty hands!”

I think literally zero people will buy it and it will all spoil in whatever warehouse it’s in.

Well, no, not "literally" zero. I'm already planning on buying some of the crepe and shortbread cookie mix!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her jam is $30 a jar. Does she think she's Erewhon?

Alllll the obsessed haters will be buying it for their YouTube channels and twitter clout. “I found a hair in my jam!” “It tastes like their non-existent kids mashed it with their dirty hands!”

I think literally zero people will buy it and it will all spoil in whatever warehouse it’s in.

Well, no, not "literally" zero. I'm already planning on buying some of the crepe and shortbread cookie mix!

Sure sure. On the clock already, eh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I worked for Meghan and obviously can’t say anything. I just want to thank everyone for their posts. I’m so happy people are finally seeing her for who she truly is. Take that as you wish.

I’m taking it as not true lol. Other than the obvious - that anyone could come on here and say anything and that if you actually had complaints you’d likely go to the press anonymously as opposed to posting on an obscure message board for a city where Meghan has never lived - there have been dozens and dozens of people who worked for her in Hollywood who vouch for her. The only complaints about workplace bullying were from the BRF.

+1. And I firmly believe those were due to her not “fitting in”:

- Being half black
- Being an “actress”
- Being from a socioeconomic class
- Not being painfully shy and super-accommodative to fit in a la Kate Middleton
- Being a typical American “go-getter” who wants to get things done and expects her staff to work instead of sitting around and drinking tea

I would guess they made it miserable for her through typical British snickers. She could have handled it *a lot* better by being calm and waiting it out, but she was immature as well.

Honestly she could have had a blast if she stayed in the BRF. No money troubles or hustling for sponsorships/deals. Show up with nice hair and makeup to cut ribbons and be fawned over. Organize innovative charity events (like that dress thing she did). She could still release inoffensive lifestyle videos for fun.

[Anonymous]

The idea that Meghan Markle was surrounded by lazy tea-drinkers employed by the BRF, where the employees and not the family members were just sipping at tea between staring at the walls and her go go go hustle hustle bustle you better werk hard-driving high-achieving self just couldn’t handle all that…tea drinking? Is amusing.

I’ll just go and place my pretzels into a bag after doing the work to get my seat at the table (attaching a cursive label reading: dancer! Nuts.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, don't most Dcumers wear Jenni Kayne? I have quite a few of her sweaters ans other clothing items, and they really are nice.

I personally can't afford Jenni Kayne but am finding the commentary in this thread that Meghan is out of touch for wearing an expensive sweater hilarious. Earlier today someone started a thread asking for summer dress recs and more than half if them are in the $300+ range, which I think is pricey. But that's considered normal on DCUM because it's a lot of high income people. But if you're Meghan apparently its tone deaf? Ok.

It’s really not normal in lifestyle programming to leave in the final edit someone getting ass-kissed for her lewk, pretending to not understand the slang, tittering modestly into her palm, and then citing extremely expensive stuff (Loro Piana). It’s at odds with what she wants to project, which is modesty. Martha Stewart did not give a solitary damn, so she could have happily snapped “Hermes, Zoran, Rei Kawakubo” and that would have been consistent. She wouldn’t have been acting like she was in The Mikado.

The objection is to how fake it all is. Martha is a real one, by which I mean a real B. And people eventually liked her for it. You gotta be what you are. If Meghan leaned into her villain era she’d gain more genuine admirers.

She came across as smug in that scene, especially when she cited the "high" part of her high/low outfit. She's never heard of "lewk"? Really?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, don't most Dcumers wear Jenni Kayne? I have quite a few of her sweaters ans other clothing items, and they really are nice.

I personally can't afford Jenni Kayne but am finding the commentary in this thread that Meghan is out of touch for wearing an expensive sweater hilarious. Earlier today someone started a thread asking for summer dress recs and more than half if them are in the $300+ range, which I think is pricey. But that's considered normal on DCUM because it's a lot of high income people. But if you're Meghan apparently its tone deaf? Ok.

It’s really not normal in lifestyle programming to leave in the final edit someone getting ass-kissed for her lewk, pretending to not understand the slang, tittering modestly into her palm, and then citing extremely expensive stuff (Loro Piana). It’s at odds with what she wants to project, which is modesty. Martha Stewart did not give a solitary damn, so she could have happily snapped “Hermes, Zoran, Rei Kawakubo” and that would have been consistent. She wouldn’t have been acting like she was in The Mikado.

The objection is to how fake it all is. Martha is a real one, by which I mean a real B. And people eventually liked her for it. You gotta be what you are. If Meghan leaned into her villain era she’d gain more genuine admirers.

+1 She had a nice enough growing up experience, she's a graduate of Northwestern, she married a prince, has a 14 million dollar home, and two precious kids. Count your blessings, girl!!! No more whining!!!

And I think most people would be able to take stock of that and go live their best life. But she just can't let the RF drama go. To me, her need to be a victim is the strongest evidence that she is a narcissist according to diagnostic criteria. Mentally healthy people are able to move on, but she just can't, and she probably think if she spins the story enough times that people will eventually realize she was "right." Whereas normal people would realize that reliving that chapter of life isn't doing her any favors.

Meghan literally whined with teary eyes that no one had asked if she was ok in an interview with Tom Bradby during her lone South Africa royal visit, where she was technically just off visiting people far, far less fortunate than she. No one in a similar position on the world stage has behaved like that, because “royalty” is a kind of public persona that does not compare to other celebrity. She is a remorselessly self-centered person and this show is very much her, innit?

Thank you for asking. Not many people have asked if I'm okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I worked for Meghan and obviously can’t say anything. I just want to thank everyone for their posts. I’m so happy people are finally seeing her for who she truly is. Take that as you wish.

I’m taking it as not true lol. Other than the obvious - that anyone could come on here and say anything and that if you actually had complaints you’d likely go to the press anonymously as opposed to posting on an obscure message board for a city where Meghan has never lived - there have been dozens and dozens of people who worked for her in Hollywood who vouch for her. The only complaints about workplace bullying were from the BRF.

+1. And I firmly believe those were due to her not “fitting in”:

- Being half black
- Being an “actress”
- Being from a socioeconomic class
- Not being painfully shy and super-accommodative to fit in a la Kate Middleton
- Being a typical American “go-getter” who wants to get things done and expects her staff to work instead of sitting around and drinking tea

I would guess they made it miserable for her through typical British snickers. She could have handled it *a lot* better by being calm and waiting it out, but she was immature as well.

Honestly she could have had a blast if she stayed in the BRF. No money troubles or hustling for sponsorships/deals. Show up with nice hair and makeup to cut ribbons and be fawned over. Organize innovative charity events (like that dress thing she did). She could still release inoffensive lifestyle videos for fun.

That fashion collab she did and the cookbook (which I have) were so good. The BRF is missing out. Their loss.

I don’t think she could do lifestyle videos though. They made her take down her blog.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her jam is $30 a jar. Does she think she's Erewhon?

Alllll the obsessed haters will be buying it for their YouTube channels and twitter clout. “I found a hair in my jam!” “It tastes like their non-existent kids mashed it with their dirty hands!”

I think literally zero people will buy it and it will all spoil in whatever warehouse it’s in.

Well, no, not "literally" zero. I'm already planning on buying some of the crepe and shortbread cookie mix!

Sure sure. On the clock already, eh?

Weird that you think I’d make that up. I bought that cookbook she wrote the forward to in order to raise money for the Grenfell victims.