Fairfax County Double Murder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Friend" why has BB cut the child off from her maternal relatives and the beloved former AP? And do not name the minor child in your reply.

"friend" previously said something to the effect of grief is complicated.

He also said the friend group was trying to convince BB to go to NY but BB the caring father got advice from a child trauma specialist that it was best not to move as not to put additional changes on the child. Yet, BB thought it was ok to have AP move into Mommy's room and replace pics of Mommy with the new couple. "Friend" said BB said it was to hard to see CB's pics in the house so therapist said it was ok to put them away.

Uh, ok.

Particularly in these circumstances, I would think!

Yes for normal people but he's obviously gaslighting everyone...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Friend" why has BB cut the child off from her maternal relatives and the beloved former AP? And do not name the minor child in your reply.

"friend" previously said something to the effect of grief is complicated.

He also said the friend group was trying to convince BB to go to NY but BB the caring father got advice from a child trauma specialist that it was best not to move as not to put additional changes on the child. Yet, BB thought it was ok to have AP move into Mommy's room and replace pics of Mommy with the new couple. "Friend" said BB said it was to hard to see CB's pics in the house so therapist said it was ok to put them away.

Uh, ok.

Was this the deleted post? does anybody have a clean version without the child’s name?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Friend" why has BB cut the child off from her maternal relatives and the beloved former AP? And do not name the minor child in your reply.

"friend" previously said something to the effect of grief is complicated.

He also said the friend group was trying to convince BB to go to NY but BB the caring father got advice from a child trauma specialist that it was best not to move as not to put additional changes on the child. Yet, BB thought it was ok to have AP move into Mommy's room and replace pics of Mommy with the new couple. "Friend" said BB said it was to hard to see CB's pics in the house so therapist said it was ok to put them away.

Uh, ok.

Was this the deleted post? does anybody have a clean version without the child’s name?

There were 2-3 posts. Generally it was mostly agnostic about BB's role in the murders. Seems like they referenced the child's name in every post. They referenced some conversations with BB after the murders. They also said that both BB and CB were fooling around.

That may have been the poster that said that the scene was such a mess that it must have had an innocent explanation.

[Anonymous]

The weirdest thing I thought the friend said is that BB told the friend group that he shot JR but made no mention of the AP shooting him as well.

[Anonymous]

Is that true? Did BB tell his friends that? I’m hoping for all of Christine’s friends that the truth comes out. How is he not telling everyone that he didn’t do it. What does he do with all his free time now? Can anyone confirm that he didn’t write an obituary- was he crying without tears at her funeral?? So frustrating.

[Anonymous]

The "friend" was a troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

his dude did walk into the house with restraints and chains and lube and a knife

Neither LE nor Commonwealth of VA has alleged any such thing.

Are there astroturfers trying to taint the local jury pool?

+1
This is the first time I’ve seen this tone toward BB on this thread. Very interesting timing considering Juliana’s trial starts next week and he’s likely to be arrested soon.

This thread is overwhelmingly anti-BB with a lot of speculation against him. I understand that given the circumstances but if anyone can speculate why can't it go the other way?

It’s wild to me how biased some people here on this 100 page thread are.

Speculating that a guy who hasn’t been charged with a crime yet is innocent is “Jury Tainting”?

But somehow declaring his immediate guilt is totally fine?

Nancy Grace wants her job back.

I guess I’m “anti-BB” in that I think he had some part in this mess. I base my opinion on the evidence so far + the fact that most often, especially where there’s an affair partner, the husband is involved.

I don’t have some agenda against BB. I just hope justice is done for the victims. If people set forth a plausible sequence of events that doesn’t involve BB, I think posters will entertain it. But you can’t just make up facts (JR is a meanie face! He likes kink! He MUST’VE done it!) and expect people to take you seriously.

I don't think anyone is entertaining any theory that doesn't involve both JR and BB seeing as how they both ended up in the house that morning. The question is whether JR initiated the violence.

It is dangerous to decide that because crimes are usually committed by X type of person we can assume guilt.

I’m pretty sure there are people who think BB is innocent of violence and perhaps even being taken advantage of by the au pair. Some of these are the same people who feel compelled to correspond and pursue romantic relationships with convicted murderers. If it turns out that BB is found guilty and is convicted, we can take bets on how quickly he will select a girlfriend from his fans and even get married. Don’t underestimate how bad people’s instincts can be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The "friend" was a troll.

I'm the friend, and I'm not a troll. I said my peace before it got deleted. I said I go back and forth on his innocence vs guilt. But it's clear no matter what some of you assume he's 100% guilty, obviously guilty, and even if he was convicted you'd think the jury was tarnished.

[Anonymous]

Anyone in NoVA able to attend AP's preliminary hearing on 1/17 at 2pm? Open to the public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

his dude did walk into the house with restraints and chains and lube and a knife

Neither LE nor Commonwealth of VA has alleged any such thing.

Are there astroturfers trying to taint the local jury pool?

+1
This is the first time I’ve seen this tone toward BB on this thread. Very interesting timing considering Juliana’s trial starts next week and he’s likely to be arrested soon.

This thread is overwhelmingly anti-BB with a lot of speculation against him. I understand that given the circumstances but if anyone can speculate why can't it go the other way?

It’s wild to me how biased some people here on this 100 page thread are.

Speculating that a guy who hasn’t been charged with a crime yet is innocent is “Jury Tainting”?

But somehow declaring his immediate guilt is totally fine?

Nancy Grace wants her job back.

I guess I’m “anti-BB” in that I think he had some part in this mess. I base my opinion on the evidence so far + the fact that most often, especially where there’s an affair partner, the husband is involved.

I don’t have some agenda against BB. I just hope justice is done for the victims. If people set forth a plausible sequence of events that doesn’t involve BB, I think posters will entertain it. But you can’t just make up facts (JR is a meanie face! He likes kink! He MUST’VE done it!) and expect people to take you seriously.

I don't think anyone is entertaining any theory that doesn't involve both JR and BB seeing as how they both ended up in the house that morning. The question is whether JR initiated the violence.

It is dangerous to decide that because crimes are usually committed by X type of person we can assume guilt.

I’m pretty sure there are people who think BB is innocent of violence and perhaps even being taken advantage of by the au pair. Some of these are the same people who feel compelled to correspond and pursue romantic relationships with convicted murderers. If it turns out that BB is found guilty and is convicted, we can take bets on how quickly he will select a girlfriend from his fans and even get married. Don’t underestimate how bad people’s instincts can be.

For those sure BB is guilty, can you explain how nobody has been charged with the stabbing/murder of CB? I don't see how BB or AU could have stabbed her and not been charged yet. You would think there would be defensive wounds, blood all over them that they couldn't have cleaned up in the time before LE arrived. That makes me think JR stabbed CB and LE is struggling with understanding how that was setup.

I don't follow it as closely as many but could those sure of BB's guilt explain who they think stabbed CB?

[Anonymous]

LE has stated Christine and Joe were victims.
Juliana has been charged with firing the fatal shot that killed Joe. So either more charges are coming her way, Brendan stabbed his wife to death, or both Juliana and Brendan took turns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone in NoVA able to attend AP's preliminary hearing on 1/17 at 2pm? Open to the public.

I’m attending.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone in NoVA able to attend AP's preliminary hearing on 1/17 at 2pm? Open to the public.

I’m attending.

Just remember that family members and friends who are grieving will be there. This isn't a reality show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

his dude did walk into the house with restraints and chains and lube and a knife

Neither LE nor Commonwealth of VA has alleged any such thing.

Are there astroturfers trying to taint the local jury pool?

+1
This is the first time I’ve seen this tone toward BB on this thread. Very interesting timing considering Juliana’s trial starts next week and he’s likely to be arrested soon.

This thread is overwhelmingly anti-BB with a lot of speculation against him. I understand that given the circumstances but if anyone can speculate why can't it go the other way?

It’s wild to me how biased some people here on this 100 page thread are.

Speculating that a guy who hasn’t been charged with a crime yet is innocent is “Jury Tainting”?

But somehow declaring his immediate guilt is totally fine?

Nancy Grace wants her job back.

I guess I’m “anti-BB” in that I think he had some part in this mess. I base my opinion on the evidence so far + the fact that most often, especially where there’s an affair partner, the husband is involved.

I don’t have some agenda against BB. I just hope justice is done for the victims. If people set forth a plausible sequence of events that doesn’t involve BB, I think posters will entertain it. But you can’t just make up facts (JR is a meanie face! He likes kink! He MUST’VE done it!) and expect people to take you seriously.

I don't think anyone is entertaining any theory that doesn't involve both JR and BB seeing as how they both ended up in the house that morning. The question is whether JR initiated the violence.

It is dangerous to decide that because crimes are usually committed by X type of person we can assume guilt.

I’m pretty sure there are people who think BB is innocent of violence and perhaps even being taken advantage of by the au pair. Some of these are the same people who feel compelled to correspond and pursue romantic relationships with convicted murderers. If it turns out that BB is found guilty and is convicted, we can take bets on how quickly he will select a girlfriend from his fans and even get married. Don’t underestimate how bad people’s instincts can be.

For those sure BB is guilty, can you explain how nobody has been charged with the stabbing/murder of CB? I don't see how BB or AU could have stabbed her and not been charged yet. You would think there would be defensive wounds, blood all over them that they couldn't have cleaned up in the time before LE arrived. That makes me think JR stabbed CB and LE is struggling with understanding how that was setup.

I don't follow it as closely as many but could those sure of BB's guilt explain who they think stabbed CB?

He did it. They are putting pressure on Ap to spill what really happened. The closer they get to trial the more pressure she will feel. The police chief has explicitly said there is more to come, more details will come out but they have to get it right because there is only once chance to convict.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone in NoVA able to attend AP's preliminary hearing on 1/17 at 2pm? Open to the public.

I’m attending.

Just remember that family members and friends who are grieving will be there. This isn't a reality show.

How is one thing related to the other? You think someone’s gonna go and make a scene there? If it’s open to the public, it’s open to the public.