Lock him up indictment FL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why does Smith continue to illegally use a DC grand jury? Hint... 95% democrat. Now a second judge calls him out

What are you talking about? Woodward is a lawyer. And Smith is allowed to use multiple grand juries in multiple jurisdictions; there is nothing illegal about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why does Smith continue to illegally use a DC grand jury? Hint... 95% democrat. Now a second judge calls him out

Apparently I will need to post this on every page. Grand Jury Rule 6(e)(3)(C) allows one Grand Jury to hear evidence from another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why does Smith continue to illegally use a DC grand jury? Hint... 95% democrat. Now a second judge calls him out

That doesn’t mean what you think it means. The prohibition cited in the tweet says Smith can’t use a DC grand jury to keep investigating the indicted charges in Florida, but that isn’t what the DC grand jury is doing. The DC grand jury is investigating different crimes that were committed in DC. Being indicted for a few crimes in one place is not immunity for different crimes in a different place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does Smith continue to illegally use a DC grand jury? Hint... 95% democrat. Now a second judge calls him out

That doesn’t mean what you think it means. The prohibition cited in the tweet says Smith can’t use a DC grand jury to keep investigating the indicted charges in Florida, but that isn’t what the DC grand jury is doing. The DC grand jury is investigating different crimes that were committed in DC. Being indicted for a few crimes in one place is not immunity for different crimes in a different place.

DRINK

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does Smith continue to illegally use a DC grand jury? Hint... 95% democrat. Now a second judge calls him out

That doesn’t mean what you think it means. The prohibition cited in the tweet says Smith can’t use a DC grand jury to keep investigating the indicted charges in Florida, but that isn’t what the DC grand jury is doing. The DC grand jury is investigating different crimes that were committed in DC. Being indicted for a few crimes in one place is not immunity for different crimes in a different place.

DRINK

If Trumpers could use logic Trump took documents from DC that he was not entitled to, thus he committed crimes in DC.

[Anonymous]

Ooopsie

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ooopsie

Yup, when Stanley Woodward was representing both of them, they both lied to the grand jury about the plan to delete the security footage. The one who got a public defender then stopped lying.

[Anonymous]

How long until Nauta flips?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So now smith has to submit in writing in a way that educates Canon without insulting her?
Or will he just insult her?

What does this refer to? Does he need to run everything through that "4th grade reading level" assessor for her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooopsie

Yup, when Stanley Woodward was representing both of them, they both lied to the grand jury about the plan to delete the security footage. The one who got a public defender then stopped lying.

I’m lost. So they lied that they’d been instructed to delete the footage??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooopsie

Yup, when Stanley Woodward was representing both of them, they both lied to the grand jury about the plan to delete the security footage. The one who got a public defender then stopped lying.

I’m lost. So they lied that they’d been instructed to delete the footage??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooopsie

Yup, when Stanley Woodward was representing both of them, they both lied to the grand jury about the plan to delete the security footage. The one who got a public defender then stopped lying.

I’m lost. So they lied that they’d been instructed to delete the footage??

Thank you! Appreciate the highlighting 😊

[Anonymous]

Jeez. That poor employee 4 is ... not in a good place. All because he worked for Trump. SMH

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now smith has to submit in writing in a way that educates Canon without insulting her?
Or will he just insult her?

What does this refer to? Does he need to run everything through that "4th grade reading level" assessor for her?

She wanted an explanation about an empaneled GJ in Dc? I think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why does Smith continue to illegally use a DC grand jury? Hint... 95% democrat. Now a second judge calls him out

Why would you post Julie Kelly's opinion as if it were relevant? She still says the election was stolen and that FBI agents were posing as MAGAs and committed the violent acts on 1-6-21. She's a crackpot. Oh wait. It's you. Get help.