Lock him up indictment FL

[Anonymous]

[list]

Anonymous wrote:Jeez. That poor employee 4 is ... not in a good place. All because he worked for Trump. SMH

Not for nothing did that “everything Trump touches dies” phrase exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jeez. That poor employee 4 is ... not in a good place. All because he worked for Trump. SMH

Zero sympathy for him. Don’t lie when you’re deposed. Especially not in service of Trump. He expects loyalty, but shows none.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does Smith continue to illegally use a DC grand jury? Hint... 95% democrat. Now a second judge calls him out

That doesn’t mean what you think it means. The prohibition cited in the tweet says Smith can’t use a DC grand jury to keep investigating the indicted charges in Florida, but that isn’t what the DC grand jury is doing. The DC grand jury is investigating different crimes that were committed in DC. Being indicted for a few crimes in one place is not immunity for different crimes in a different place.

DRINK

If Trumpers could use logic Trump took documents from DC that he was not entitled to, thus he committed crimes in DC.

And the perjury by the grand jury witnesses occurred in DC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeez. That poor employee 4 is ... not in a good place. All because he worked for Trump. SMH

Zero sympathy for him. Don’t lie when you’re deposed. Especially not in service of Trump. He expects loyalty, but shows none.

Well he was smart enough to talk to another attorney that was apparently competent enough to let him know what his life was going to be like with the feds gunning for him. I can at least respect that. Those other two are pretty dim and likely to do more time than Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does Smith continue to illegally use a DC grand jury? Hint... 95% democrat. Now a second judge calls him out

That doesn’t mean what you think it means. The prohibition cited in the tweet says Smith can’t use a DC grand jury to keep investigating the indicted charges in Florida, but that isn’t what the DC grand jury is doing. The DC grand jury is investigating different crimes that were committed in DC. Being indicted for a few crimes in one place is not immunity for different crimes in a different place.

DRINK

If Trumpers could use logic Trump took documents from DC that he was not entitled to, thus he committed crimes in DC.

And the perjury by the grand jury witnesses occurred in DC.

Hey MAGAs, why did he lie in his previous testimony? If there was nothing to hide, why did Trump push this guy to perjure himself?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooopsie

Yup, when Stanley Woodward was representing both of them, they both lied to the grand jury about the plan to delete the security footage. The one who got a public defender then stopped lying.

I’m lost. So they lied that they’d been instructed to delete the footage??

Thank you! Appreciate the highlighting 😊

You’re welcome! This is also a really good explanation thread:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooopsie

Yup, when Stanley Woodward was representing both of them, they both lied to the grand jury about the plan to delete the security footage. The one who got a public defender then stopped lying.

I’m lost. So they lied that they’d been instructed to delete the footage??

Thank you! Appreciate the highlighting 😊

You’re welcome! This is also a really good explanation thread:

For people not wanting to give X any clicks:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1694270181567078607.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooopsie

Yup, when Stanley Woodward was representing both of them, they both lied to the grand jury about the plan to delete the security footage. The one who got a public defender then stopped lying.

I’m lost. So they lied that they’d been instructed to delete the footage??

Thank you! Appreciate the highlighting 😊

You’re welcome! This is also a really good explanation thread:

For people not wanting to give X any clicks:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1694270181567078607.html

Thank you for sharing this. It was very informative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does Smith continue to illegally use a DC grand jury? Hint... 95% democrat. Now a second judge calls him out

That doesn’t mean what you think it means. The prohibition cited in the tweet says Smith can’t use a DC grand jury to keep investigating the indicted charges in Florida, but that isn’t what the DC grand jury is doing. The DC grand jury is investigating different crimes that were committed in DC. Being indicted for a few crimes in one place is not immunity for different crimes in a different place.

DRINK

If Trumpers could use logic Trump took documents from DC that he was not entitled to, thus he committed crimes in DC.

And the perjury by the grand jury witnesses occurred in DC.

Hey MAGAs, why did he lie in his previous testimony? If there was nothing to hide, why did Trump push this guy to perjure himself?

More likely, he didn’t lie but was told he should “tell the truth or the Feds will get him every which way from Sunday”. Because the Feds can. Ask Schumer

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does Smith continue to illegally use a DC grand jury? Hint... 95% democrat. Now a second judge calls him out

That doesn’t mean what you think it means. The prohibition cited in the tweet says Smith can’t use a DC grand jury to keep investigating the indicted charges in Florida, but that isn’t what the DC grand jury is doing. The DC grand jury is investigating different crimes that were committed in DC. Being indicted for a few crimes in one place is not immunity for different crimes in a different place.

DRINK

If Trumpers could use logic Trump took documents from DC that he was not entitled to, thus he committed crimes in DC.

And the perjury by the grand jury witnesses occurred in DC.

Hey MAGAs, why did he lie in his previous testimony? If there was nothing to hide, why did Trump push this guy to perjure himself?

More likely, he didn’t lie but was told he should “tell the truth or the Feds will get him every which way from Sunday”. Because the Feds can. Ask Schumer

Of course dear, he “didn’t lie” about having no memory of this super unusual event. And when you lie in interviews about crimes, cops can get you. In every single police station in America. Not sure how this would be different.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does Smith continue to illegally use a DC grand jury? Hint... 95% democrat. Now a second judge calls him out

That doesn’t mean what you think it means. The prohibition cited in the tweet says Smith can’t use a DC grand jury to keep investigating the indicted charges in Florida, but that isn’t what the DC grand jury is doing. The DC grand jury is investigating different crimes that were committed in DC. Being indicted for a few crimes in one place is not immunity for different crimes in a different place.

DRINK

If Trumpers could use logic Trump took documents from DC that he was not entitled to, thus he committed crimes in DC.

And the perjury by the grand jury witnesses occurred in DC.

Hey MAGAs, why did he lie in his previous testimony? If there was nothing to hide, why did Trump push this guy to perjure himself?

More likely, he didn’t lie but was told he should “tell the truth or the Feds will get him every which way from Sunday”. Because the Feds can. Ask Schumer

Of course dear, he “didn’t lie” about having no memory of this super unusual event. And when you lie in interviews about crimes, cops can get you. In every single police station in America. Not sure how this would be different.

Gee neither do I

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooopsie

Yup, when Stanley Woodward was representing both of them, they both lied to the grand jury about the plan to delete the security footage. The one who got a public defender then stopped lying.

I’m lost. So they lied that they’d been instructed to delete the footage??

Thank you! Appreciate the highlighting 😊

You’re welcome! This is also a really good explanation thread:

Judge Aileen Cannon is asking the Justice Department and Donald Trump co-defendant Walt Nauta to weigh in on the legality of special counsel Jack Smith's ongoing grand jury activity in Washington, DC, which relates to the obstruction portion of the Mar-a-Lago documents case before her in Florida

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooopsie

Yup, when Stanley Woodward was representing both of them, they both lied to the grand jury about the plan to delete the security footage. The one who got a public defender then stopped lying.

I’m lost. So they lied that they’d been instructed to delete the footage??

Thank you! Appreciate the highlighting 😊

You’re welcome! This is also a really good explanation thread:

Judge Aileen Cannon is asking the Justice Department and Donald Trump co-defendant Walt Nauta to weigh in on the legality of special counsel Jack Smith's ongoing grand jury activity in Washington, DC, which relates to the obstruction portion of the Mar-a-Lago documents case before her in Florida

She seems to just be trying to run out the clock. Talk about wasting taxpayer dollars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooopsie

Yup, when Stanley Woodward was representing both of them, they both lied to the grand jury about the plan to delete the security footage. The one who got a public defender then stopped lying.

I’m lost. So they lied that they’d been instructed to delete the footage??

Thank you! Appreciate the highlighting 😊

You’re welcome! This is also a really good explanation thread:

Judge Aileen Cannon is asking the Justice Department and Donald Trump co-defendant Walt Nauta to weigh in on the legality of special counsel Jack Smith's ongoing grand jury activity in Washington, DC, which relates to the obstruction portion of the Mar-a-Lago documents case before her in Florida

She seems to just be trying to run out the clock. Talk about wasting taxpayer dollars.

Ugh. To what end? Honestly, if Trump were innocent (lol, but sure, I’ll pretend he was only accused and presumed innocent), he’d want to prove it and quickly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooopsie

Yup, when Stanley Woodward was representing both of them, they both lied to the grand jury about the plan to delete the security footage. The one who got a public defender then stopped lying.

I’m lost. So they lied that they’d been instructed to delete the footage??

Thank you! Appreciate the highlighting 😊

You’re welcome! This is also a really good explanation thread:

Judge Aileen Cannon is asking the Justice Department and Donald Trump co-defendant Walt Nauta to weigh in on the legality of special counsel Jack Smith's ongoing grand jury activity in Washington, DC, which relates to the obstruction portion of the Mar-a-Lago documents case before her in Florida

She seems to just be trying to run out the clock. Talk about wasting taxpayer dollars.

She's not very bright, and it shows. All her time-wasting is moot anyway, now there are indictments in far more energetic jurisdictions.
Nothing she does will work in her favor at this point: either she takes her sweet time and becomes a laughing-stock, or she tries to be a professional, but is schooled by the real professionals.