| I agree, op. 1,000 %. It is troubling, and it is tiresome. |
But they are not grounded. They are the most confused generation in history. Exhibit A- the child you described above. |
I see no issue with renaming tomboy to something else and expanding the definition of bi, etc..., the only echo chamber here is in your head. |
+10000. I can give you Exhibit B-Z as well, to include OP's child. |
| Every single person here who says that all these kids are confused and the whole thing is troubling would have said the exact same thing about a gay kid in the eighties. |
Which is part of the difference. It wasn't a trend then to experiment with one's identity and sexuality to the degree that it is now. |
|
Just seems like a colossal waste of time and mental energy, apart from kids with actual gender dysphoria.
Also reading this chain made me feel like we are doing girls a disservice but making it seem like being a woman is so terrible and such a burden to carry. FFS. |
That is exactly what people said to those kids. That it was a trend, a phase, etc. |
My child doesn’t think being a woman is terrible, they just don’t identify as one. They don’t want to be a man either. |
And you don't see a problem with that? That your child is that removed from reality? She doesn't "want" to be a man? What in the world would your precious like in life, PP? I'm being totally serious. |
Despite what this generation thinks, there is not a third option. |
It was no where near the degree that it is happening now, nor was it supported/ encouraged by adults in their lives. |
Great--thanks for letting us know. I've reported some posts for misinformation, so I'm glad to see Jeff is responding. |
Right. Same thing that's said about every generation about some thing that freaks their parents out because they don't understand it. |
Why not? Who are you to say that? If you’re willing to accept the first step, who are you to tell PPs child that she cannot be a flamingo, or perhaps a starfish? |