Digging the interim Jeopardy host

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's sickening they're trying to cancel Mike Richards in hopes of bringing in fan favorite (and sub-par host) LeVar Burton.

What’s so great about Mike Richards? Everything I’ve seen about him screams scumbag.

He's not running for president and he's not the pope, he's a stupid game show host and he's apparently pretty good at it.

Vote with your clicker. Don't watch.

DP. He is an awful host actually. And, apparently a vile person too.

+1. Awful host and vile person.

Wrong, he was a good host, no matter what you think of him as a person.

Are you blind? He was terrible.

I care about who I support in my watching. Being a decent human being should be the bare minimum.

And this guy's apology acted like this was a youthful mistake? He was 39 when he used these slurs. I'm more than five years younger than that and I know better.

He's vile, calculating, and not someone I would ever want my kid to watch on TV.

This.

[Anonymous]

I hope Mayim gets it now. Lavar was awful and I won’t be able to watch if it’s him.

[Anonymous]

Of course, no one on this thread has ever exercised their right to free speech and uttered something years ago that could be interpreted as offensive to others…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course, no one on this thread has ever exercised their right to free speech and uttered something years ago that could be interpreted as offensive to others…

I did, but it was before the age of social media so it never happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course, no one on this thread has ever exercised their right to free speech and uttered something years ago that could be interpreted as offensive to others…

... you know the "right to free speech" doesn't shield you from the consequences of saying terrible things

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course, no one on this thread has ever exercised their right to free speech and uttered something years ago that could be interpreted as offensive to others…

I'm so tickled by all of the affronted bigots in this thread. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE TO THE VERY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA! RICH WHITE GUYS MUST BE ABLET TO SAY WHATEVER THEY WANT AND STILL GET PROMOTED TO THE HIGHEST LEVELS OR ELSE COMMUNISM REIGNS SUPREME! CONSEQUENCES ARE MURDER!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is rapidly becoming an excellent example of how people’s minds are being hacked by hive mentalities on social media. Very sad.

Those are all certainly words.

Wouldn’t expect either of you to understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, no one on this thread has ever exercised their right to free speech and uttered something years ago that could be interpreted as offensive to others…

... you know the "right to free speech" doesn't shield you from the consequences of saying terrible things

And who made you judge, jury, and executioner?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, no one on this thread has ever exercised their right to free speech and uttered something years ago that could be interpreted as offensive to others…

... you know the "right to free speech" doesn't shield you from the consequences of saying terrible things

And who made you judge, jury, and executioner?

When's the execution?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, no one on this thread has ever exercised their right to free speech and uttered something years ago that could be interpreted as offensive to others…

... you know the "right to free speech" doesn't shield you from the consequences of saying terrible things

And who made you judge, jury, and executioner?

Collectively viewers decided they didn't want a person of his low character in the job. Consequences.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is rapidly becoming an excellent example of how people’s minds are being hacked by hive mentalities on social media. Very sad.

Those are all certainly words.

Wouldn’t expect either of you to understand.

Yes, those with high standards for civil behavior can't be expected to understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, no one on this thread has ever exercised their right to free speech and uttered something years ago that could be interpreted as offensive to others…

... you know the "right to free speech" doesn't shield you from the consequences of saying terrible things

And who made you judge, jury, and executioner?

Dude, I'm sorry if you're worried some terrible things you said on a podcast are going to prevent you too from being host of Jeopardy. You get to be a certain age, you've done some things, some doors are closed. Happens to all of us. Good day.

[Anonymous]

Bye bye racist, misogynistic white guy. You got what you deserved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course, no one on this thread has ever exercised their right to free speech and uttered something years ago that could be interpreted as offensive to others…

Interpreted? lol. Not a lot of ambiguity in his bigoted remarks, but nice try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, no one on this thread has ever exercised their right to free speech and uttered something years ago that could be interpreted as offensive to others…

... you know the "right to free speech" doesn't shield you from the consequences of saying terrible things

And who made you judge, jury, and executioner?

Collectively viewers decided they didn't want a person of his low character in the job. Consequences.

No, it was a collection of some viewers who wish to intimidate and bully others to conform to their own way of thinking about things.