NY Post publishes nude photos of Melania

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not a fan of the demonizing and mocking of spouses, but after the class of the Obamas, it's hard to look at these two as being their follow up.

That aside. Are PP and I the only ones who find those poses just awkward? I'm not seeing the artistic side at all.

She was 25. They were modeling pictures and the purpose of having them taken was to get her work in modeling.

Are they artsy fartsy fantastic? I don't think that they are. But apparently, at least 20 years ago, these are the types of photos that got models work?

Its very porny looking. She looks like a whore. But she was 28-29 years old, well past her peak as a model and this was what she was getting offers for. That is why she was eager to sell herself to the little wrinkly old pervert.

A high faison nude looks like this -

Clearly this is not "porny" looking - and completely a classy pic when compared to Melania's work.

wtf?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm somewhat shocked that Mr. Jeff would want to put nude photos up of such a beautiful woman.

He's now hittin' below the belt. Folks are starting to get really worried that Trump will win, so let's pull out all the stops. They're desperate.

What else can you do to try to embarrass him?
Perhaps nude photos of his daughters will be next?

Well, the Trump supporters will actually appreciate nude photos of the daughters. After all the prurient Donald Trump himself said that at least one of his daughters is "hot" and he would have dated her if he could. So, maybe he should ask the daughters to participate in a nude photoshoot, and hopefully this way he can generate some income for his campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not a fan of the demonizing and mocking of spouses, but after the class of the Obamas, it's hard to look at these two as being their follow up.

That aside. Are PP and I the only ones who find those poses just awkward? I'm not seeing the artistic side at all.

She was 25. They were modeling pictures and the purpose of having them taken was to get her work in modeling.

Are they artsy fartsy fantastic? I don't think that they are. But apparently, at least 20 years ago, these are the types of photos that got models work?

Its very porny looking. She looks like a whore. But she was 28-29 years old, well past her peak as a model and this was what she was getting offers for. That is why she was eager to sell herself to the little wrinkly old pervert.

A high faison nude looks like this -

Clearly this is not "porny" looking - and completely a classy pic when compared to Melania's work.

wtf?

I have no agree. I don't really see the difference? What makes the one with Gigi less porny?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not a fan of the demonizing and mocking of spouses, but after the class of the Obamas, it's hard to look at these two as being their follow up.

That aside. Are PP and I the only ones who find those poses just awkward? I'm not seeing the artistic side at all.

She was 25. They were modeling pictures and the purpose of having them taken was to get her work in modeling.

Are they artsy fartsy fantastic? I don't think that they are. But apparently, at least 20 years ago, these are the types of photos that got models work?

Its very porny looking. She looks like a whore. But she was 28-29 years old, well past her peak as a model and this was what she was getting offers for. That is why she was eager to sell herself to the little wrinkly old pervert.

A high faison nude looks like this -

Clearly this is not "porny" looking - and completely a classy pic when compared to Melania's work.

wtf?

I have no agree. I don't really see the difference? What makes the one with Gigi less porny?

Sorry. Correction: I have to agree...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not a fan of the demonizing and mocking of spouses, but after the class of the Obamas, it's hard to look at these two as being their follow up.

That aside. Are PP and I the only ones who find those poses just awkward? I'm not seeing the artistic side at all.

She was 25. They were modeling pictures and the purpose of having them taken was to get her work in modeling.

Are they artsy fartsy fantastic? I don't think that they are. But apparently, at least 20 years ago, these are the types of photos that got models work?

Its very porny looking. She looks like a whore. But she was 28-29 years old, well past her peak as a model and this was what she was getting offers for. That is why she was eager to sell herself to the little wrinkly old pervert.

A high faison nude looks like this -

Nope.
Just goes to show money doesn't buy class.

[Anonymous]

NO SLUT SHAMING PEOPLE !

You should know better.

[Anonymous]

Doesn't look like the same person

[Anonymous]

I don't really understand why beautiful women get plastic surgery (boobs, face). You were born practically perfect and now you look like a lion with tits... Why??

[Anonymous]

She wasn't posing for Mario Testino or Terry Richardson. These are really, really bad images reminiscent of something like Penthouse or Oui taken by a hack who landed in prison for money laundering, gun running and distributing MDMA. Keeping it classy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She wasn't posing for Mario Testino or Terry Richardson. These are really, really bad images reminiscent of something like Penthouse or Oui taken by a hack who landed in prison for money laundering, gun running and distributing MDMA. Keeping it classy!

Terry Richardson is a pedophile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The linked article indicates that the pictures were taken in '96 for a French magazine. 20 years ago. That would make Melania around 25/26 at the time.

As far as whether or not she was "high fashion" or not is not really the issue - it was still modeling work. There are different levels of modeling and different types of modeling jobs. A JC Penney clothes catalog might not be high end work but it is still work. I have no clue what level Melania was modeling at but it appears that the photos were professional work done for a magazine.

Cognitive dissonance at it's best. Posing for soft-core porn isn't just another modeling job. Most models don't have to be completely naked to make a living.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The linked article indicates that the pictures were taken in '96 for a French magazine. 20 years ago. That would make Melania around 25/26 at the time.

As far as whether or not she was "high fashion" or not is not really the issue - it was still modeling work. There are different levels of modeling and different types of modeling jobs. A JC Penney clothes catalog might not be high end work but it is still work. I have no clue what level Melania was modeling at but it appears that the photos were professional work done for a magazine.

Cognitive dissonance at it's best. Posing for soft-core porn isn't just another modeling job. Most models don't have to be completely naked to make a living.

Apparently in Europe this sort of thing is par for the course and all a part of modeling. I am really not familiar with European modeling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She wasn't posing for Mario Testino or Terry Richardson. These are really, really bad images reminiscent of something like Penthouse or Oui taken by a hack who landed in prison for money laundering, gun running and distributing MDMA. Keeping it classy!

Terry Richardson is a pedophile.

Maybe. Or maybe not. The point is that he has worked with virtually every celeb and top model and has shot too many fashion covers to count. Ale de Basseville: not so much. The now defunct Max was a crappy softcore French Europorn magazine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The linked article indicates that the pictures were taken in '96 for a French magazine. 20 years ago. That would make Melania around 25/26 at the time.

As far as whether or not she was "high fashion" or not is not really the issue - it was still modeling work. There are different levels of modeling and different types of modeling jobs. A JC Penney clothes catalog might not be high end work but it is still work. I have no clue what level Melania was modeling at but it appears that the photos were professional work done for a magazine.

Cognitive dissonance at it's best. Posing for soft-core porn isn't just another modeling job. Most models don't have to be completely naked to make a living.

Apparently in Europe this sort of thing is par for the course and all a part of modeling. I am really not familiar with European modeling.

Weren't these pictures shot in America?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm somewhat shocked that Mr. Jeff would want to put nude photos up of such a beautiful woman.

He's now hittin' below the belt. Folks are starting to get really worried that Trump will win, so let's pull out all the stops. They're desperate.

What else can you do to try to embarrass him?
Perhaps nude photos of his daughters will be next?

Posting these pictures are completely uncalled for. It is not necessary to release photos to prove that Melania will not be your typical 1st lady and Trump is not your typical President. But I disagree with you on this hitting below the belt, there isn't any belt lower than the one Trump hits every time he moves his little Twitter fingers.