NY Post publishes nude photos of Melania

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not a fan of the demonizing and mocking of spouses, but after the class of the Obamas, it's hard to look at these two as being their follow up.

That aside. Are PP and I the only ones who find those poses just awkward? I'm not seeing the artistic side at all.

I will never vote for Trump (or probably Hillary since I don't live in a swing state). But the known fucked up-ness of the Clinton marriage is a silver lining of her winning. People treat the Obamas as near demigods with no failings and a grand romance for the ages. (They are just people, like the rest of us.)

[Anonymous]

Don't know what the big deal is, it was a couple of nude photos and she's beautiful. Unless you're a jealous fattie or a misgonist this isn't an issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don't know what the big deal is, it was a couple of nude photos and she's beautiful. Unless you're a jealous fattie or a misgonist this isn't an issue.

the irony in your post

You just negated your point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm somewhat shocked that Mr. Jeff would want to put nude photos up of such a beautiful woman.

He's now hittin' below the belt. Folks are starting to get really worried that Trump will win, so let's pull out all the stops. They're desperate.

What else can you do to try to embarrass him?
Perhaps nude photos of his daughters will be next?

Posting these pictures are completely uncalled for. It is not necessary to release photos to prove that Melania will not be your typical 1st lady and Trump is not your typical President. But I disagree with you on this hitting below the belt, there isn't any belt lower than the one Trump hits every time he moves his little Twitter fingers.

If he wins, I hope she hangs her photos in the WH. Now THAT would be breaking the mold!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm somewhat shocked that Mr. Jeff would want to put nude photos up of such a beautiful woman.

He's now hittin' below the belt. Folks are starting to get really worried that Trump will win, so let's pull out all the stops. They're desperate.

What else can you do to try to embarrass him?
Perhaps nude photos of his daughters will be next?

Posting these pictures are completely uncalled for. It is not necessary to release photos to prove that Melania will not be your typical 1st lady and Trump is not your typical President. But I disagree with you on this hitting below the belt, there isn't any belt lower than the one Trump hits every time he moves his little Twitter fingers.

If he wins, I hope she hangs her photos in the WH. Now THAT would be breaking the mold!

Me too! I think the photos of her are beautifully done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anti-Trump, but that's just wrong.

Why? She did what she did (posed).

Because they are TRYING to shame her.

She should not be ashamed. She is a model, she posed nude, it was her job, she looks amazing, the pictures are beautiful.
They are trying to say "models that pose nude" = "bad 1st Lady" = "bad person"

it's total bullshit

(I am not the PP but I am anti-Trump and sick of the media trying to embarrass and shame Melania.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not a fan of the demonizing and mocking of spouses, but after the class of the Obamas, it's hard to look at these two as being their follow up.

That aside. Are PP and I the only ones who find those poses just awkward? I'm not seeing the artistic side at all.

I will never vote for Trump (or probably Hillary since I don't live in a swing state). But the known fucked up-ness of the Clinton marriage is a silver lining of her winning. People treat the Obamas as near demigods with no failings and a grand romance for the ages. (They are just people, like the rest of us.)

The hyperbole is completely unnecessary. There is no denying that the Obamas have been a class act and the contrast is just too stark to ignore.

[Anonymous]

Gawker (I KNOW) and several other articles I've read are theorizing that Trump leaked those photos himself to move attention from himself. Sadly, I can see that as a possibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't know what the big deal is, it was a couple of nude photos and she's beautiful. Unless you're a jealous fattie or a misgonist this isn't an issue.

the irony in your post

You just negated your point.

Being fat isn't a women's issue, it's a health issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gawker (I KNOW) and several other articles I've read are theorizing that Trump leaked those photos himself to move attention from himself. Sadly, I can see that as a possibility.

No, I think Trump leaked the photos to bring more attention to himself. He loves attention, whether it's positive or negative. He wasn't getting enough, with the Khan and Russia kerfuffles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not a fan of the demonizing and mocking of spouses, but after the class of the Obamas, it's hard to look at these two as being their follow up.

That aside. Are PP and I the only ones who find those poses just awkward? I'm not seeing the artistic side at all.

She was 25. They were modeling pictures and the purpose of having them taken was to get her work in modeling.

Are they artsy fartsy fantastic? I don't think that they are. But apparently, at least 20 years ago, these are the types of photos that got models work?

Its very porny looking. She looks like a whore. But she was 28-29 years old, well past her peak as a model and this was what she was getting offers for. That is why she was eager to sell herself to the little wrinkly old pervert.

A high faison nude looks like this -

Well we all enjoyed THAT cover of Gigi. Thanks!

[Anonymous]

The GOP platform is as virulently anti-LGBT as any in recent history and the would-be Republican First Lady modeled nude girl-on-girl photos.

I'm sorry, but that is lesbian porn, not fashion. Do we really want a First Lady that deserves her own X-rated cable channel?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't know what the big deal is, it was a couple of nude photos and she's beautiful. Unless you're a jealous fattie or a misgonist this isn't an issue.

the irony in your post

You just negated your point.

Being fat isn't a women's issue, it's a health issue.

Stop being stupid.

Or perhaps you really ARE stupid and need a refresher in literary devices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The GOP platform is as virulently anti-LGBT as any in recent history and the would-be Republican First Lady modeled nude girl-on-girl photos.

I'm sorry, but that is lesbian porn, not fashion. Do we really want a First Lady that deserves her own X-rated cable channel?

don't know

Hill had a hard time owning up to the fact that she was opposed to gay marriage.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vgIe2GKudYY
Hillary Clinton Snaps At NPR Host After Defensive Gay Marriage Interview

[Anonymous]

Anyone who needs to attack Melania over her past to find a reason not to support Trump really hasn't been paying attention.