This is moral gibberish. Suppose the other mom demanded that OP fly to their international vacation destination to hand deliver the bathing suit. We would all agree that's unreasonable, right? So clearly there's SOME threshold at which we think OP no longer has an obligation to accommodate the other mom. The question is just what that level of inconvenience is. Saying OP's inconvenience is irrelevant because of a moral obligation is plainly wrong. |
Seriously. I'm on the Jersey shore right now and I'm pretty sure I could WALK to the Target here in 15 minutes. |
She said "later that night" not "later tonight." I doubt this happened today. It sounds like she is rehashing something that has come and gone.
|
We have a house on the Jersey Shore and my kids were in the ocean last weekend and the weekend before. It's too cold for me at 55°, but not for everyone. |
I would agree with you EXCEPT OP offered. OP should not have offered if she was unwilling. Yes, offering to return something and then refusing to do so is bitchy. |
No one said she lives near Baltimore. Another poster asked if that was the scenario. |
It sounded to me like the OP offered because she assumed that the family lived the same 10 minutes from the private school that she does (and that most normal people would say to just bring the suit to school on Monday). If most of the families live close to the school (which is pretty much true of our private school) but this one family lives far away, she probably assumed it was a much shorter trip when offering and only realized that it was so long when given the address. We go to a NW private but live on Capitol Hill. It's not 50 minutes, but I would never expect another family to drive over here in the middle of the night, with or without a baby, for something so small. Karma is a bitch and my kid is definitely going to screw up the same way at some point because kids just do stuff like this. I feel like this thread is 99 normal people who agree with the OP and understand the concept of the normal aggravations that come along with having kids and one person who keeps responding (in a fairly easy to spot writing style) who disagrees and is filled with moral outrage. That level of moral outrage must be exhausting to maintain! |
| Did anyone read "Where'd You Go, Bernadette" by Maria Semple? This thread feels like an episode from that book. Pretty soon the other mom is going to say that the OP ran over her foot in the school parking lot. |
the other family lives 50 minutes away from OP, not the school. The probably just live in the opposite direction from the school than OP. |
|
|
I actually imagined the conversation went like this ("CB" = crazy bitch"):
CB: "Hi, it looks like your son accidentally grabbed my son's swimsuit. We're packing for a trip to the Jersey Shore in the morning. Is there any way we can get it back tonight?" OP: "Oh my gosh, I'm so sorry. Let me drive it to you." CB: "That would be great, my address is ---" OP: "Oh. That's 50 minutes away! My husband is out of town, I have a sleeping baby, and I need to put my other kid to bed. Sorry." CB: "Oh ok. Can I meet you at address X instead? It's about half as far for you, but I'm in the middle of packing, so I can't get there until 10:00." OP: "Um...let me check with DCUM and get back to you." Who is the crazy bitch in this scenario? |
+1 |
I don't think it's hat simple. Other kid should have checked his things, maybe other kid picked up OP's kids suit first and caused it all. Regardless, the lady is out of line. |
I loved that book! |
How do you know OP isn't the one who lives far? Why are you assuming the other mom is crazy based just on OPs retell? |