+1. And this advice also works if kid is not a big reader! We followed a similar path and kid at an ivy. Leaned into and supported kid's natural aptitudes and interests (academic and outside school). Prioritized school, involvement, and teacher relationships. Head of 1 club but no major in school leadership titles. Didn’t force higest rigor in every subject. Found programs that fit kid's interests. Made thoughtful choices, not expensive programs. But we were engaged. Plenty of friends hire outside help (and that's ok), but I felt I knew my kid best and I was was interested, willing and able to put in the work to research and learn about the process. |
Will you share what kind of part time job and was it during the school year or summer? DC wants to keep working his summer job which we support, but also feel he's missing out on other summer opportunites. It's also a job that's pretty common and lots of people discount as not interesting enough. :/ |
Of course, no refund. Not Asian and not CS either. |
Horrible horrible counseling. And essays most likely. |
Wow I can think of a much different word than “heartbreaking.” Smh. |
Not sure what word you wanted to use, but I have a lot of compassion for the kids. There is no guaranteed way to get into Stanford or any of the Ivies, sadly. That doesn’t mean some kids don’t but their butts trying. It’s tragic because they tie way too much of their sense of self to what schools they get into. From the amount of money spent, I’m guessing the zaps could smell “over-coached application” from a mile away. |
You what top schools probably don’t want? Kids that are such unbearable snobs that they would turn their nose up at a good public college because they would have to go to school with their “lesser” peers. Kids who so lack resilience and perspective that they are “utterly devastated” for long periods of time because they … horrors! … have to go to a very good liberal arts college in Boston. I’m sure these qualities were apparent in their applications. And yes like PP said, I’m sure that their applications did not bear the signs of effortless high intelligence that easily opens the door to top colleges. You know it when you see it. sorry. |
| “zaps” was supposed to be “AOs”. No idea where that autocorrect came from. |
Right so I agree. The heartbreaking thing was their totally irrational pursuit of Stanford, pushed I guess by your sister? |
I feel really bad for the kids. I wonder what the parents might have done to nurture that unrealistic hope/expectation of Harvard/Stanford in their kids. Or if it was the parents’ peer group or the kids’ peer group. |
Are you sure about their profiles? I simply can’t wrap my head around what happened to your nieces. My son is only a normal high stats kid with good grades and SAT score (below top 5% but within top 10% in his non-elite high school) and decent ECs. He hasn’t had a private consultant or tutor at any point in high school. His common app essay was good, but he wrote his supplemental essays at the last minute so the quality varies. He already got into a better school than Boston College and I wouldn’t be surprised if he has even better offers in RD! |
DC1: PT job extended from school year through summers. Tied tangentially to major (think something with plant nurseries and gardening and the like). For 3 years, leading to more and more responsibilities. Pretty uncommon which led to some other opps which may have "looked good" in the college process? DC2: No pt job but did have 2 summer internships (sourced on own). Very different paths. |
|
It might be that the LORs and the interviews (things that are not controllable by the admissions consultant) didn't match the curated part.
If the narrative the admissions consultant put together is "empathetic high achiever" but the teachers (or school counselor) didn't experience that, I would imagine that it would make the larger package suspect. What if the letter writer called out something else (that is complimentary) but not at all in-line with a main theme the consultant tried to create? It would seem strange if the main narrative wasn't referenced at all in the teacher recs. One of the weak-spots of over-consulted packages is that it takes one credible, external source saying something really different for the whole thing to weaken. Top colleges have relationships with top high schools (public and private). More experienced AOs usually have the feeder schools in their portfolio, and they've seen a lot applications, and have data for several years admission from competitive areas in front of them. |
| I get the impression the market for private college consultants is saturated already. There’s also plenty of free stuff out there, so I can only see very marginal benefits from paying such a hefty fee. |