Emailed you. |
Since solicitation is not allowed on this site, you are clearly a college counselor who has no problem bending the rules. |
Technically, the counselor didn't solicit anything. |
| This is the type of counselor that can actually make a difference: https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/fqo68j/aos_cant_actually_detect_authenticity_or_passion/ |
|
My sister in bay area paid upwards of $200k for each of her kids for college counseling and I had a first hand view into how much stress both my nieces went through. Every single aspect of their high school experience was micro managed. Oldest got into Washington University spent the first year trying to transfer out but ended up gradating there. The younger one at Boston College and was utterly devastated and took a long time to recover.
We refused to pay that kind of money and we are paying $6k for the essays and guidance. In at UVA, so we are quite happy, but have a few T20 apps in. Fingers crossed. |
Pay $200k to get into Boston College??!! Why did the other not like WashU? |
You don’t need to spend that kind of money. If they are borderline and test optional students and BC was a reach, I can see spending 10-15k on essays and packaging. But wasteful. Test prep and tutors might have helped more. |
|
OP, I hear you. We've wrestled with this, too, and decided against consultants as we wanted the kids to develop a solid sense of self and pride of accomplishment. In our case, using a consultant and curating a plausible life for their applications I fear would impart the idea that we did not trust or value their decisions, interests or abilities. The cost is too high at a crucial time of parental influence (the high school years before they launch) and the value of self-governance and trust that we give them by allowing them to own the application process will hopefully serve them well over their lifetime.
Every situation is different and we see that private consultants can achieve goals. Parents want the best for their child. It's understandable. However, don't discount the message you send to your child when or how you engage this service. Consider guidance vs. curation. |
Both were shooting for Stanford and Yale/Harvard. The counselor was a former Stanford AO. It is more disappointment that after working so hard, both had near perfect GPA's, high test scores, high rigor, EC's, etc. that you could not get into T20. It was insane how much Stanford looms over them. Younger got into UC San Diego, but could not bear to go there as lots of kids from same HS with much lower stats/EC's ended up there and it seemed a let down. It is heart breaking to see people you love go through this. |
Big tip: 9th grade summer get a paid job that isn't a jr summer camp counselor at your sleep away camp. I know kid is under 16 so it's not easy. But if you a find something - or a full time unpaid job with a title like on a campaign - it will set up getting admitted to "known" summer program 10th grade summer which helps 11 grade summer. |
Well WashU is a top 20! Did they get a refund from that former Stanford AO? Are they Asian applying to CS by any chance? |
If you have smart kids who read a lot and are generally curious, have them go about their way. Encourage good grades to the best of their ability (get tutors if necessary), require involvement in 1 inside of school and 1 outside of school activity - whatever they choose - it's their choice, and encourage active relationships with the teacher (including active participation). In Jan of junior year, write out all activities, favorite teachers, favorite hobbies, and apply to some summer programs. Work on essays over the summer and make sure at least 3-4 activities align with the major (you don't pick the major in advance - look at your lists of activities, classes, and teachers to see where the natural and authentic alignment exists), then make a list of schools. Include 10 or so reach schools in RD if your kid is ambitious and aiming for T20. Followed this for 2 kids so far. Ivy (pt job forever for this one) and T10. Absolutely no "curation". Allowed their natural interests to come through. And their supplemental essays were filled with intellectual curiosity because they actually cared/lived those interests. |
Your kids were not smart enough or did not take the hardest courses. Genuine top kids with max rigor and As without tutors, top 1% scores on unprepped PSAT or other normed tests can get in to T20 without a problem, no hooks, no private counselors. All of mine have as well as many of their top few in the class friends at a variety of magnets and privates. One of mine got into multiple T10/ivy no hooks because they were the best student from their school in addition to all the rest. Parents should not encourage their non-naturally-top 1% or maybe 2% students to go for these top schools. They are not for them. Aim lower. |
Stop with your constant messaging of "non-natural top 1%" and go back to wherever you were born. That's not what top schools want. I'm a 2nd-generation Indian American and have plenty of experience with "top schools" (probably much more than you in my family) and this "aim lower" bs you are constantly espousing here. Get a life. Top schools want interesting and interested students. Self-driven. A B here or there is not a deterrent (and wasn't for my kids). Get out of your CS/STEM bubble. |
To be fair, UCSD is relatively easy to get into for a normal high stats kid with decent ECs and essays. |