Katie Porter’s viral interview video

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

For folks willing to watch, this is the entire set of interviews, where yes, the reporter asks EVERY SINGLE CANDIDATE the same questions.

Comms 101: answer the question you want asked, not the one you were asked. Like they all did except her.

Katie's cooked.

I said Katie blew it earlier. Watching this a few things:

--The interviewer is clearly a biased Republican misogynist. She only pushed back on the women.

--The interviewer didn't ask the questions in the same way.

--I really like Betty Lee. Can we back her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

For folks willing to watch, this is the entire set of interviews, where yes, the reporter asks EVERY SINGLE CANDIDATE the same questions.

Comms 101: answer the question you want asked, not the one you were asked. Like they all did except her.

Katie's cooked.

I said Katie blew it earlier. Watching this a few things:

--The interviewer is clearly a biased Republican misogynist. She only pushed back on the women.

--The interviewer didn't ask the questions in the same way.

--I really like Betty Lee. Can we back her?

You people are delusional and also know nothing of California. Julie Watts (the journalist) is well-known in California for her investigative work with CalMatters, which is a nonprofit focused on nonpartisan takes on news. CalMatters is heavily funded by a large slate of deep blue names. She is about as far from Republican as you can get as a mainstream journalist.

She won an Emmy for her investigation into how millions were put at risk of identity theft by the EDD. She also got another Emmy for her work on cancer-causing pollution in a rural California town.

You sound like a fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Californian here. Are those of you who are so actively defending her in this thread actually from California? I don’t know anyone in California who feels the way some of you do, especially the people who are excusing her behavior because Trump.

There’s a lot of people in California, it is impressive that you know enough of them to feel like you can speak for the state.

So you’re not from California. I figured as much.

Oooohhhh, you got me. I did live there for a while though and none of the people I knew there are dumb enough to participate in this misogynist pile on. Hard to believe it’s possible but maybe don’t know the same people!

I live in California. This has zero to do with her being a woman and 100% with being exposed as completely incompetent.

[Anonymous]

This one disappoints me. Rep Porter is bright but for me, talking in a contemptuous way to staff or press is a big big no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Californian here. Are those of you who are so actively defending her in this thread actually from California? I don’t know anyone in California who feels the way some of you do, especially the people who are excusing her behavior because Trump.

There’s a lot of people in California, it is impressive that you know enough of them to feel like you can speak for the state.

So you’re not from California. I figured as much.

Oooohhhh, you got me. I did live there for a while though and none of the people I knew there are dumb enough to participate in this misogynist pile on. Hard to believe it’s possible but maybe don’t know the same people!

I live in California. This has zero to do with her being a woman and 100% with being exposed as completely incompetent.

+1 So sick of posters crying misogyny in an attempt to cover up incompetence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe this attitude is what it will take to fight Trump. Because taking the high road hasn’t helped anyone so far.

You aren't fighting Trump.

He HAS the high road.

It's you who are abusing the courts to stall for time, even though you eventually lose the cases.

It's you who are pushing for political assassinations.

It's you who simply want more power, but when you get it, you F everything up because you can't figure out things work in the real world vs. what progressives think will work because they look good on paper.

Go away.

Ok, MAGA. You're definitely someone to take seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

For folks willing to watch, this is the entire set of interviews, where yes, the reporter asks EVERY SINGLE CANDIDATE the same questions.

Comms 101: answer the question you want asked, not the one you were asked. Like they all did except her.

Katie's cooked.

I said Katie blew it earlier. Watching this a few things:

--The interviewer is clearly a biased Republican misogynist. She only pushed back on the women.

--The interviewer didn't ask the questions in the same way.

--I really like Betty Lee. Can we back her?

You people are delusional and also know nothing of California. Julie Watts (the journalist) is well-known in California for her investigative work with CalMatters, which is a nonprofit focused on nonpartisan takes on news. CalMatters is heavily funded by a large slate of deep blue names. She is about as far from Republican as you can get as a mainstream journalist.

She won an Emmy for her investigation into how millions were put at risk of identity theft by the EDD. She also got another Emmy for her work on cancer-causing pollution in a rural California town.

You sound like a fool.

Uh, I was born and raised in in California. Clearly you can’t refute what I said. She attacked both women. She’s wearing a cross. You can win journalism awards for pollution and still be a partisan woman-hating hack.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Californian here. Are those of you who are so actively defending her in this thread actually from California? I don’t know anyone in California who feels the way some of you do, especially the people who are excusing her behavior because Trump.

There’s a lot of people in California, it is impressive that you know enough of them to feel like you can speak for the state.

So you’re not from California. I figured as much.

Oooohhhh, you got me. I did live there for a while though and none of the people I knew there are dumb enough to participate in this misogynist pile on. Hard to believe it’s possible but maybe don’t know the same people!

I live in California. This has zero to do with her being a woman and 100% with being exposed as completely incompetent.

+1 So sick of posters crying misogyny in an attempt to cover up incompetence.

You have to admit, the misogyny claims have merit here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

For folks willing to watch, this is the entire set of interviews, where yes, the reporter asks EVERY SINGLE CANDIDATE the same questions.

Comms 101: answer the question you want asked, not the one you were asked. Like they all did except her.

Katie's cooked.

I said Katie blew it earlier. Watching this a few things:

--The interviewer is clearly a biased Republican misogynist. She only pushed back on the women.

--The interviewer didn't ask the questions in the same way.

--I really like Betty Lee. Can we back her?

You people are delusional and also know nothing of California. Julie Watts (the journalist) is well-known in California for her investigative work with CalMatters, which is a nonprofit focused on nonpartisan takes on news. CalMatters is heavily funded by a large slate of deep blue names. She is about as far from Republican as you can get as a mainstream journalist.

She won an Emmy for her investigation into how millions were put at risk of identity theft by the EDD. She also got another Emmy for her work on cancer-causing pollution in a rural California town.

You sound like a fool.

Uh, I was born and raised in in California. Clearly you can’t refute what I said. She attacked both women. She’s wearing a cross. You can win journalism awards for pollution and still be a partisan woman-hating hack.

Also, CBS is now under right wing control.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

For folks willing to watch, this is the entire set of interviews, where yes, the reporter asks EVERY SINGLE CANDIDATE the same questions.

Comms 101: answer the question you want asked, not the one you were asked. Like they all did except her.

Katie's cooked.

I said Katie blew it earlier. Watching this a few things:

--The interviewer is clearly a biased Republican misogynist. She only pushed back on the women.

--The interviewer didn't ask the questions in the same way.

--I really like Betty Lee. Can we back her?

You people are delusional and also know nothing of California. Julie Watts (the journalist) is well-known in California for her investigative work with CalMatters, which is a nonprofit focused on nonpartisan takes on news. CalMatters is heavily funded by a large slate of deep blue names. She is about as far from Republican as you can get as a mainstream journalist.

She won an Emmy for her investigation into how millions were put at risk of identity theft by the EDD. She also got another Emmy for her work on cancer-causing pollution in a rural California town.

You sound like a fool.

Uh, I was born and raised in in California. Clearly you can’t refute what I said. She attacked both women. She’s wearing a cross. You can win journalism awards for pollution and still be a partisan woman-hating hack.

Also, CBS is now under right wing control.

Exactly. A journalist wearing a cross for political interviews is a very poor choice, especially in this climate. She should know better.

[Anonymous]

We are at the point of progressive delusion where we attack people for wearing crosses? You people have lost the plot entirely.

Would you attack a woman wearing a hijab interviewing a pro-Israel candidate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe this attitude is what it will take to fight Trump. Because taking the high road hasn’t helped anyone so far.

You aren't fighting Trump.

He HAS the high road.

It's you who are abusing the courts to stall for time, even though you eventually lose the cases.

It's you who are pushing for political assassinations.

It's you who simply want more power, but when you get it, you F everything up because you can't figure out things work in the real world vs. what progressives think will work because they look good on paper.

Go away.

How do you function day to day? What an wild alternate universe you live in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We are at the point of progressive delusion where we attack people for wearing crosses? You people have lost the plot entirely.

Would you attack a woman wearing a hijab interviewing a pro-Israel candidate?

She is not being “attacked”. We’re having a problem with Christian Nationalists right now and they’ve not been behaving in ethical, legal, or morally appropriate ways. So, yeah, it’s going to make people question her neutrality when she interviewing politicians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have to say I was surprised. This isn't a good look. She's always had an A game in hearings, but she really flubbed her answers -- which honestly made Dems look bad.

Weird conclusion.. It doesn't make "Dems" look bad, it makes her look bad.

Her statement that we don't need MAGA is bad to say out loud. I agree with her, but I do think it makes her look as vindictive and partisan as MAGA.

That's literally what we're fighting against now. We want MAGA to realize that we're the party of labor, stable economy, and more affordable health.

It’s also true, though. MAGA is only 30% of the population. We just need the other 70% to vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

For folks willing to watch, this is the entire set of interviews, where yes, the reporter asks EVERY SINGLE CANDIDATE the same questions.

Comms 101: answer the question you want asked, not the one you were asked. Like they all did except her.

Katie's cooked.

I said Katie blew it earlier. Watching this a few things:

--The interviewer is clearly a biased Republican misogynist. She only pushed back on the women.

--The interviewer didn't ask the questions in the same way.

--I really like Betty Lee. Can we back her?

You people are delusional and also know nothing of California. Julie Watts (the journalist) is well-known in California for her investigative work with CalMatters, which is a nonprofit focused on nonpartisan takes on news. CalMatters is heavily funded by a large slate of deep blue names. She is about as far from Republican as you can get as a mainstream journalist.

She won an Emmy for her investigation into how millions were put at risk of identity theft by the EDD. She also got another Emmy for her work on cancer-causing pollution in a rural California town.

You sound like a fool.

Uh, I was born and raised in in California. Clearly you can’t refute what I said. She attacked both women. She’s wearing a cross. You can win journalism awards for pollution and still be a partisan woman-hating hack.

Also, CBS is now under right wing control.

Exactly. A journalist wearing a cross for political interviews is a very poor choice, especially in this climate. She should know better.

So are you saying we should purge all the pro-zionist reporters as well because they're completely inflexible in thought and openly gaslight people?