Who is secretly a little relieved to see the end of DEI policies and trainings?

[Anonymous]

Can we please get rid of the "fun facts" about new team members while we're at it?

One thing that I would really like to eliminate all together is "protections" for people who are

1. Prior military (why does prior military job deserve "special protections"? are you a "protected" veteran?)
2. The Alphabet DEIs (why is what you choose to do in your private life and in your bedroom any concern of your coworkers? why do I care if you're gay or not? and why do you deserve special protection for that?)
3. Hispanic (this isn't even a race). Stop asking everyone if they are white, non-hispanic. Stop asking for race. Period. It doesn't matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can we please get rid of the "fun facts" about new team members while we're at it?

One thing that I would really like to eliminate all together is "protections" for people who are

1. Prior military (why does prior military job deserve "special protections"? are you a "protected" veteran?)

What special protections do Vets get?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can we please get rid of the "fun facts" about new team members while we're at it?

One thing that I would really like to eliminate all together is "protections" for people who are

1. Prior military (why does prior military job deserve "special protections"? are you a "protected" veteran?)
2. The Alphabet DEIs (why is what you choose to do in your private life and in your bedroom any concern of your coworkers? why do I care if you're gay or not? and why do you deserve special protection for that?)
3. Hispanic (this isn't even a race). Stop asking everyone if they are white, non-hispanic. Stop asking for race. Period. It doesn't matter.

Agreed. Women at work should be forbidden from saying anything that would reveal they have husbands or kids. That’s disgusting! No one wants to know what you do in the bedroom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Im just happy we will stop pressuring children on sexuality. Like who you want, but don’t feel pressured to “identify” as sexual. These are kids!!

You think federal DEI hiring offices were pressuring kids on sexuality.

What? What do you think these offices actually do?

Asking K-5 to designate their pronouns is sexualizing children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Im just happy we will stop pressuring children on sexuality. Like who you want, but don’t feel pressured to “identify” as sexual. These are kids!!

You think federal DEI hiring offices were pressuring kids on sexuality.

What? What do you think these offices actually do?

Asking K-5 to designate their pronouns is sexualizing children.

Federal DEI training was doing that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Im just happy we will stop pressuring children on sexuality. Like who you want, but don’t feel pressured to “identify” as sexual. These are kids!!

You think federal DEI hiring offices were pressuring kids on sexuality.

What? What do you think these offices actually do?

Asking K-5 to designate their pronouns is sexualizing children.

How is it sexualizing them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I spent so much time on DEI training, and a lot of it I had to do nights and weekends because I was too busy with regular work. All I learned was that DEI instructors are themselves racist, sexist, and ageist.

100 percent agree. I worked in private schools and the "DEI" consultant was the most racist person I've ever met in my life. (I'm a brown person.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we please get rid of the "fun facts" about new team members while we're at it?

One thing that I would really like to eliminate all together is "protections" for people who are

1. Prior military (why does prior military job deserve "special protections"? are you a "protected" veteran?)

What special protections do Vets get?

Because the vet preference ran under DEI offices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah -no more videos! No more "meet your teammate slides"

Just meet your bosses dim witted nephew meetings. Train your new dim witted boss is the newest “other duties as assigned”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can we please get rid of the "fun facts" about new team members while we're at it?

One thing that I would really like to eliminate all together is "protections" for people who are

1. Prior military (why does prior military job deserve "special protections"? are you a "protected" veteran?)
2. The Alphabet DEIs (why is what you choose to do in your private life and in your bedroom any concern of your coworkers? why do I care if you're gay or not? and why do you deserve special protection for that?)
3. Hispanic (this isn't even a race). Stop asking everyone if they are white, non-hispanic. Stop asking for race. Period. It doesn't matter.

well at least you are hostile and bitter towards everyone. Sounds like some DEIA training got through to you!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we please get rid of the "fun facts" about new team members while we're at it?

One thing that I would really like to eliminate all together is "protections" for people who are

1. Prior military (why does prior military job deserve "special protections"? are you a "protected" veteran?)

What special protections do Vets get?

Because the vet preference ran under DEI offices.

and accessibility...and lots of vets need reasonable accommodations.

[Anonymous]

We had a lot of DEI trainings at my workplace (public education). We had to review these "expectations" for all of them; this is what underlay the basis of all of our trainings and DEI "work."

Four Agreements
1. Stay engaged: Staying engaged means “remaining morally, emotionally,
intellectually, and socially involved in the dialogue”
2. Experience discomfort: This norm acknowledges that discomfort is inevitable,
especially, in dialogue about race, and that participants make a commitment to
bring issues into the open. It is not talking about these issues that create divisiveness. The divisiveness already exists in the society and in our schools. It is through dialogue, even when uncomfortable, the healing and change begin.

3. Speak your truth: This means being open about thoughts and feelings and not
just saying what you think others want to hear.

4. Expect and accept non­closure: This agreement asks participants to “hang out
in uncertainty” and not rush to quick solutions, especially in relation to racial
understanding, which requires ongoing dialogue

Six Conditions: **Note: The intent of these co
1. Focus on personal, local and immediate
2. Isolate race
3. Normalize social construction & multiple perspectives
4. Monitor agreements, conditions and establish parameters
5. Use a "working definition" for race
6. Examine the presence and role of "Whiteness"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Im just happy we will stop pressuring children on sexuality. Like who you want, but don’t feel pressured to “identify” as sexual. These are kids!!

You think federal DEI hiring offices were pressuring kids on sexuality.

What? What do you think these offices actually do?

Asking K-5 to designate their pronouns is sexualizing children.

What? What do pronouns you use to refer to me tell anyone about my sexual preferences or practices? I’m not being argumentative—I really don’t understand the connection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Im just happy we will stop pressuring children on sexuality. Like who you want, but don’t feel pressured to “identify” as sexual. These are kids!!

You think federal DEI hiring offices were pressuring kids on sexuality.

What? What do you think these offices actually do?

Asking K-5 to designate their pronouns is sexualizing children.

This is such a lie (coming from a parent of k-5 kids).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of money was spent just to add an additional field for pronoun preferences and only about 2% of the people are providing the info anyway.

Yes, this is the problem. Progressives cared way too much about stuff that impacted a tiny fraction of the population, while the vast majority of the population's main worry was inflation and crime, which Progressives really didn't do much about. The soft on crime attitude like for shoplifting and petty theft was taking a toll on people. Even CA passed a law recently to impose more severe punishment on shoplifters.

The problem with Progressives is that they don't know where to draw the line. People don't care about how you identify yourself, but Progressives pushed that in everyone's faces. Meanwhile, people's cars are constantly being broken into, and shoplifters just walk out of the stores with a trashbag full of stuff because criminals know that progressives will go soft on them.

That's why Dems lost.

- Trump hater, with every fiber of my being.

I am pretty much you, except now I am really really liking Trump. This is the punishment liberals deserve. I hope it gets much worse.