Who is secretly a little relieved to see the end of DEI policies and trainings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, very happy. I'm private too, but I posted here maybe like a year ago about how I was voluntold to be the DEI Hispanic representative of for our group. Thing is, I am not Hispanic - I am a white woman with absolutely zero Hispanic background. I was asked to attend all of the Hispanic DEI meetings and represent our group - no one wanted to do this so my manager's manager voluntold me to do it. Let me make it clear that this wasn't a 'learning about Hispanic culture thing' - no this was some sort of support group for Hispanic employees. I did not feel comfortable doing this at all, and told him this. He said he'd 'get back to me.' Never did, nothing ever came of it.

Not DEI, but this happened to me to be the millennial representative for my group on an agency wide task force back in the day. I’m not a millennial. I just happened to be the youngest person in my work group. But I was supposed to tell this task force what would attract millennials to work for us. I have no idea, I’m not one!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A lot of money was spent just to add an additional field for pronoun preferences and only about 2% of the people are providing the info anyway.

Yes, this is the problem. Progressives cared way too much about stuff that impacted a tiny fraction of the population, while the vast majority of the population's main worry was inflation and crime, which Progressives really didn't do much about. The soft on crime attitude like for shoplifting and petty theft was taking a toll on people. Even CA passed a law recently to impose more severe punishment on shoplifters.

The problem with Progressives is that they don't know where to draw the line. People don't care about how you identify yourself, but Progressives pushed that in everyone's faces. Meanwhile, people's cars are constantly being broken into, and shoplifters just walk out of the stores with a trashbag full of stuff because criminals know that progressives will go soft on them.

That's why Dems lost.

- Trump hater, with every fiber of my being.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even 17 year old high school students have to write essays about diversity. The essay prompts make you feel guilty for not being black or Hispanic.

If you want to understand why Trump won, DEI would be one of the top issues. My cousin who is a professor in a STEM field, who had been a hard core left wing liberal, got fed up with democrats. He voted for republicans, thought not for Trump.

No, they don’t. GMAFB.

You can't insist to someone that they do not feel the way they feel about their own race in a situation.
See how that works?

It’s RWNJ creative fiction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Im just happy we will stop pressuring children on sexuality. Like who you want, but don’t feel pressured to “identify” as sexual. These are kids!!

I'll take things that never happened for 1000 alex.

+1

Rs are full of sht.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of money was spent just to add an additional field for pronoun preferences and only about 2% of the people are providing the info anyway.

Yes, this is the problem. Progressives cared way too much about stuff that impacted a tiny fraction of the population, while the vast majority of the population's main worry was inflation and crime, which Progressives really didn't do much about. The soft on crime attitude like for shoplifting and petty theft was taking a toll on people. Even CA passed a law recently to impose more severe punishment on shoplifters.

The problem with Progressives is that they don't know where to draw the line. People don't care about how you identify yourself, but Progressives pushed that in everyone's faces. Meanwhile, people's cars are constantly being broken into, and shoplifters just walk out of the stores with a trashbag full of stuff because criminals know that progressives will go soft on them.

That's why Dems lost.

- Trump hater, with every fiber of my being.

Like trans people in sports <1% of the population

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of money was spent just to add an additional field for pronoun preferences and only about 2% of the people are providing the info anyway.

Yes, this is the problem. Progressives cared way too much about stuff that impacted a tiny fraction of the population, while the vast majority of the population's main worry was inflation and crime, which Progressives really didn't do much about. The soft on crime attitude like for shoplifting and petty theft was taking a toll on people. Even CA passed a law recently to impose more severe punishment on shoplifters.

The problem with Progressives is that they don't know where to draw the line. People don't care about how you identify yourself, but Progressives pushed that in everyone's faces. Meanwhile, people's cars are constantly being broken into, and shoplifters just walk out of the stores with a trashbag full of stuff because criminals know that progressives will go soft on them.

That's why Dems lost.

- Trump hater, with every fiber of my being.

Funny how you don’t mind pushing RWNJ propaganda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I do think the pendulum swung too far with the DEI stuff, however, I’d rather watch 1,000 videos reminding me to be nice and respectful of all people than work under the current regime that runs on fear and hatred.

It is neither nice nor respectful to threaten people’s livelihood for using the wrong pronouns.

That is the definition of tyranny and fear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do think the pendulum swung too far with the DEI stuff, however, I’d rather watch 1,000 videos reminding me to be nice and respectful of all people than work under the current regime that runs on fear and hatred.

It is neither nice nor respectful to threaten people’s livelihood for using the wrong pronouns.

That is the definition of tyranny and fear.

No one was threatened with firing for using the wrong pronouns by mistake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Im just happy we will stop pressuring children on sexuality. Like who you want, but don’t feel pressured to “identify” as sexual. These are kids!!

I'll take things that never happened for 1000 alex.

Tell me you don’t have kids in middle school without telling me you don’t have kids in middle school.

[Anonymous]

Me! And I'm not so secret about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:yes they went too far. Inability to temper this is one of the reasons Trump won and I’m pissed about it.

+1 backlash against going to far left. FWIW, I'm a non white female.

+2 It was a good idea implemented in a heavy-handed way with no common sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Im just happy we will stop pressuring children on sexuality. Like who you want, but don’t feel pressured to “identify” as sexual. These are kids!!

I'll take things that never happened for 1000 alex.

Tell me you don’t have kids in middle school without telling me you don’t have kids in middle school.

Weird. I remember being in middle school and being teased mercilessly for being “gay,” even before I was sure I was. I got called a lot more explicit slurs too. None of the Republican adults I knew seemed to care that those kids knew what the terms meant. And trust me, they overheard plenty.

[Anonymous]

In the meantime, some people are concerned about what the American people should really be concerned about. DEI was always about getting younger people in the office, and it really doesn't matter. By default, younger people are more diverse. There will more than likely be many more lawsuits filed. Nothing has changed about people's poor behavior. I don't know why people think "getting rid of DEI" means getting rid of anyone who is a prior military white male straight Christian.

As of January 27, 2025, the average price for a dozen Grade A large eggs in Washington, D.C., is approximately $4.15. This reflects a significant increase from $3.65 in November 2024 and $2.15 in January 2024.
Source: AGWEB

Over the past two weeks, egg prices have continued to rise due to ongoing outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), which have severely impacted poultry populations and egg production nationwide. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) projects that retail egg prices could increase by an additional 20% in 2025.
Source: AGWEB

Given these factors, consumers in Washington, D.C., and across the country are experiencing higher egg prices compared to two weeks ago, with expectations of continued increases in the near future.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of money was spent just to add an additional field for pronoun preferences and only about 2% of the people are providing the info anyway.

Yes, this is the problem. Progressives cared way too much about stuff that impacted a tiny fraction of the population, while the vast majority of the population's main worry was inflation and crime, which Progressives really didn't do much about. The soft on crime attitude like for shoplifting and petty theft was taking a toll on people. Even CA passed a law recently to impose more severe punishment on shoplifters.

The problem with Progressives is that they don't know where to draw the line. People don't care about how you identify yourself, but Progressives pushed that in everyone's faces. Meanwhile, people's cars are constantly being broken into, and shoplifters just walk out of the stores with a trashbag full of stuff because criminals know that progressives will go soft on them.

That's why Dems lost.

- Trump hater, with every fiber of my being.

Funny how you don’t mind pushing RWNJ propaganda.

And it’s this kind of stupidity on the left that got us Trump 2.0. Thanks a lot “LWNJ”.

[Anonymous]

Yeah -no more videos! No more "meet your teammate slides"