Who is secretly a little relieved to see the end of DEI policies and trainings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we please get rid of the "fun facts" about new team members while we're at it?

One thing that I would really like to eliminate all together is "protections" for people who are

1. Prior military (why does prior military job deserve "special protections"? are you a "protected" veteran?)
2. The Alphabet DEIs (why is what you choose to do in your private life and in your bedroom any concern of your coworkers? why do I care if you're gay or not? and why do you deserve special protection for that?)
3. Hispanic (this isn't even a race). Stop asking everyone if they are white, non-hispanic. Stop asking for race. Period. It doesn't matter.

Agreed. Women at work should be forbidden from saying anything that would reveal they have husbands or kids. That’s disgusting! No one wants to know what you do in the bedroom.

No, here's where you are wrong. It is a woman's biological imperative to be the sex between male or female to reproduce and care for a newborn infant. If a woman employee chooses to have a baby, she deserves some protections under the law. That doesn't have anything to do with DEI. It has to do with biology and FACTS.

We should have had mandated maternity leave a long time ago for women employees who give birth and need that time to recover physically. I also think there should be some paid paternal leave for both parents, whether gay, straight, or adoptive parents. How's that for progressive? If you're so progressive, stop asking people to identify whether they're straight or gay. Who cares?

Caregivers, including a caregiver of a parent, should get some protections under the law that have nothing to do with DEI.

Way to ignore my point. It is incredibly inappropriate for a woman to mention her husband at work. Why does she think we want to know who she has sex with? This is the office.

No one cares if you're a gay man and you want to talk about your husband. Go ahead. You don't deserve to be fired for it, but you also don't deserve special protections for it. Do you see the difference? If you're so progressive, stop asking people on job applications to identify whether they like men or women.

No one got special protections. It’s illegal to fire a person for being black, and it’s illegal to fire a person for being white. That’s equal treatment.

Those EEO questions you’re so mad about are specifically not seen by hiring managers. They’re optional and are used for aggregate data analysis. Your choice on those boxes is never linked to your name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of money was spent just to add an additional field for pronoun preferences and only about 2% of the people are providing the info anyway.

Yes, this is the problem. Progressives cared way too much about stuff that impacted a tiny fraction of the population, while the vast majority of the population's main worry was inflation and crime, which Progressives really didn't do much about. The soft on crime attitude like for shoplifting and petty theft was taking a toll on people. Even CA passed a law recently to impose more severe punishment on shoplifters.

The problem with Progressives is that they don't know where to draw the line. People don't care about how you identify yourself, but Progressives pushed that in everyone's faces. Meanwhile, people's cars are constantly being broken into, and shoplifters just walk out of the stores with a trashbag full of stuff because criminals know that progressives will go soft on them.

That's why Dems lost.

- Trump hater, with every fiber of my being.

I am pretty much you, except now I am really really liking Trump. This is the punishment liberals deserve. I hope it gets much worse.

Progressives are responsible for reforms such as direct primaries, campaign finance, civil service, anti-lobbying laws, state income and inheritance taxes, child labor restrictions, food safety laws, workmen's compensation laws and regulation of railroads, public utilities, factories, banks and Wall Street.

Maybe we can do away FDIC and fraudulent practices in stock market and securities industry?