Why do you engage with MAGA on DCUM?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020.

Like who? The whole problem post debate fiasco was that there was no credible option to take on Trump who could actually win. Kamala was literally the best the party could come up with because the field is so incredibly weak. And it still is! Who is up next? Newsom who is never going to recover politically after the wildfires??

Back in the day we used to have these things called open and fair primaries where legitimate, pre-approved by the American people candidates emerged. This is where two term better than average presidents like Obama and Clinton come from. People that would never lose to a two-bit elderly reality TV personality like Trump. I can't tell you who that would have been in 2016, 2020, or 2024 because there were no open and fair Dem primaries. Yes, when there is no field, the field is indeed weak.

We had primaries in 2016 and 2020. I remember who I voted for and I remember the debates.

What happened last year is just the risk of having an 80 year old in the position. That’s about to be Trump. He can’t run again but if he could, that exact same scenario could have happened to him.

There were Dem primaries in 2016 and 2020 but they were not open and fair primaries. The mega donors wanted known commodities in HRC and Biden to be nominated and that's what they got. Party leaders/DNC weren't about to let voters get tied up in some candidate that would piss of their wealthy donors like a Bernie Sanders.

Do you think the people behind the curtain at the RNC and DNC and all the parasites sucking money off our parties give a dang who is president as long as billions of donated dollars continue to be fed through their sticky hands during every election cycle?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020.

Like who? The whole problem post debate fiasco was that there was no credible option to take on Trump who could actually win. Kamala was literally the best the party could come up with because the field is so incredibly weak. And it still is! Who is up next? Newsom who is never going to recover politically after the wildfires??

Back in the day we used to have these things called open and fair primaries where legitimate, pre-approved by the American people candidates emerged. This is where two term better than average presidents like Obama and Clinton come from. People that would never lose to a two-bit elderly reality TV personality like Trump. I can't tell you who that would have been in 2016, 2020, or 2024 because there were no open and fair Dem primaries. Yes, when there is no field, the field is indeed weak.

We had primaries in 2016 and 2020. I remember who I voted for and I remember the debates.

What happened last year is just the risk of having an 80 year old in the position. That’s about to be Trump. He can’t run again but if he could, that exact same scenario could have happened to him.

Biden’s problem wasn’t so much his age at first term but waiting too long before deciding not to run again. He waited too long and it screwed over his party.

At that age and in such a stressful position, the aging can happen rapidly. I don’t think it was a malicious decision. He literally ran during the campaign and brought his Peloton to the White House.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:hunky progressive demosons

That’s an oxymoron, emphasis on moron. Out of curiosity what are their pronouns? Does your daughter go to an all women’s college?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s maybe one maga poster here that actually knows what she’s talking about. The rest can’t spell, or build a sentence to save their lives. They’re also poorly informed on how their own government works. That’s a solid representation of the maga people I know IRL.

Another liberal on their high horse thinking they’re better than everyone else 🙄

So smug

High horse of a 5th grade understanding of how our government works, and how names are spelled?!

You go ahead and worship ignorance. It’s a good look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020.

Like who? The whole problem post debate fiasco was that there was no credible option to take on Trump who could actually win. Kamala was literally the best the party could come up with because the field is so incredibly weak. And it still is! Who is up next? Newsom who is never going to recover politically after the wildfires??

Back in the day we used to have these things called open and fair primaries where legitimate, pre-approved by the American people candidates emerged. This is where two term better than average presidents like Obama and Clinton come from. People that would never lose to a two-bit elderly reality TV personality like Trump. I can't tell you who that would have been in 2016, 2020, or 2024 because there were no open and fair Dem primaries. Yes, when there is no field, the field is indeed weak.

We had primaries in 2016 and 2020. I remember who I voted for and I remember the debates.

What happened last year is just the risk of having an 80 year old in the position. That’s about to be Trump. He can’t run again but if he could, that exact same scenario could have happened to him.

Biden’s problem wasn’t so much his age at first term but waiting too long before deciding not to run again. He waited too long and it screwed over his party.

At that age and in such a stressful position, the aging can happen rapidly. I don’t think it was a malicious decision. He literally ran during the campaign and brought his Peloton to the White House.

But isn’t that the problem with age? It may not have been malicious but age seems to have affected his decision making. I think the blame lies more with Jill and his other advisors precisely because his mental capacities have been impacted by age. A sad situation but his holding on too long absolutely cost Harris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020.

Like who? The whole problem post debate fiasco was that there was no credible option to take on Trump who could actually win. Kamala was literally the best the party could come up with because the field is so incredibly weak. And it still is! Who is up next? Newsom who is never going to recover politically after the wildfires??

Back in the day we used to have these things called open and fair primaries where legitimate, pre-approved by the American people candidates emerged. This is where two term better than average presidents like Obama and Clinton come from. People that would never lose to a two-bit elderly reality TV personality like Trump. I can't tell you who that would have been in 2016, 2020, or 2024 because there were no open and fair Dem primaries. Yes, when there is no field, the field is indeed weak.

We had primaries in 2016 and 2020. I remember who I voted for and I remember the debates.

What happened last year is just the risk of having an 80 year old in the position. That’s about to be Trump. He can’t run again but if he could, that exact same scenario could have happened to him.

Biden’s problem wasn’t so much his age at first term but waiting too long before deciding not to run again. He waited too long and it screwed over his party.

At that age and in such a stressful position, the aging can happen rapidly. I don’t think it was a malicious decision. He literally ran during the campaign and brought his Peloton to the White House.

But isn’t that the problem with age? It may not have been malicious but age seems to have affected his decision making. I think the blame lies more with Jill and his other advisors precisely because his mental capacities have been impacted by age. A sad situation but his holding on too long absolutely cost Harris.

Exactly and our brilliant American voters fixed this problem by electing........ wait what?..... another unfit 78 year old person! Fool me once, shame on you.... fool me twice, shame on me. We must do better my fellow Americans. I still love you all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020.

Like who? The whole problem post debate fiasco was that there was no credible option to take on Trump who could actually win. Kamala was literally the best the party could come up with because the field is so incredibly weak. And it still is! Who is up next? Newsom who is never going to recover politically after the wildfires??

Back in the day we used to have these things called open and fair primaries where legitimate, pre-approved by the American people candidates emerged. This is where two term better than average presidents like Obama and Clinton come from. People that would never lose to a two-bit elderly reality TV personality like Trump. I can't tell you who that would have been in 2016, 2020, or 2024 because there were no open and fair Dem primaries. Yes, when there is no field, the field is indeed weak.

We had primaries in 2016 and 2020. I remember who I voted for and I remember the debates.

What happened last year is just the risk of having an 80 year old in the position. That’s about to be Trump. He can’t run again but if he could, that exact same scenario could have happened to him.

Biden’s problem wasn’t so much his age at first term but waiting too long before deciding not to run again. He waited too long and it screwed over his party.

At that age and in such a stressful position, the aging can happen rapidly. I don’t think it was a malicious decision. He literally ran during the campaign and brought his Peloton to the White House.

But isn’t that the problem with age? It may not have been malicious but age seems to have affected his decision making. I think the blame lies more with Jill and his other advisors precisely because his mental capacities have been impacted by age. A sad situation but his holding on too long absolutely cost Harris.

No, the blame is never on the spouse. He’s a grown man and he has a professional staff around him. Resist the temptation to always, always, always blame the woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020.

Like who? The whole problem post debate fiasco was that there was no credible option to take on Trump who could actually win. Kamala was literally the best the party could come up with because the field is so incredibly weak. And it still is! Who is up next? Newsom who is never going to recover politically after the wildfires??

Back in the day we used to have these things called open and fair primaries where legitimate, pre-approved by the American people candidates emerged. This is where two term better than average presidents like Obama and Clinton come from. People that would never lose to a two-bit elderly reality TV personality like Trump. I can't tell you who that would have been in 2016, 2020, or 2024 because there were no open and fair Dem primaries. Yes, when there is no field, the field is indeed weak.

We had primaries in 2016 and 2020. I remember who I voted for and I remember the debates.

What happened last year is just the risk of having an 80 year old in the position. That’s about to be Trump. He can’t run again but if he could, that exact same scenario could have happened to him.

Biden’s problem wasn’t so much his age at first term but waiting too long before deciding not to run again. He waited too long and it screwed over his party.

At that age and in such a stressful position, the aging can happen rapidly. I don’t think it was a malicious decision. He literally ran during the campaign and brought his Peloton to the White House.

But isn’t that the problem with age? It may not have been malicious but age seems to have affected his decision making. I think the blame lies more with Jill and his other advisors precisely because his mental capacities have been impacted by age. A sad situation but his holding on too long absolutely cost Harris.

Exactly and our brilliant American voters fixed this problem by electing........ wait what?..... another unfit 78 year old person! Fool me once, shame on you.... fool me twice, shame on me. We must do better my fellow Americans. I still love you all.

Trump won’t be stressed. He doesn’t take the job seriously. He’ll pack his schedule full of “executive time” and trips to his resorts where he’ll charge secret service higher prices for their room and meals all while he takes bribes though his fake coin scheme.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are people here comfortable with their daughters cuddling on the couch with a MAGA boyfriend to watch Squid Game?

Yes. He probably got her a blanket to keep warm and a holds her hand making her feel safe and appreciated.

We are raising men, not soy boys.

Wow. Maga men are the worst.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020.

Like who? The whole problem post debate fiasco was that there was no credible option to take on Trump who could actually win. Kamala was literally the best the party could come up with because the field is so incredibly weak. And it still is! Who is up next? Newsom who is never going to recover politically after the wildfires??

Back in the day we used to have these things called open and fair primaries where legitimate, pre-approved by the American people candidates emerged. This is where two term better than average presidents like Obama and Clinton come from. People that would never lose to a two-bit elderly reality TV personality like Trump. I can't tell you who that would have been in 2016, 2020, or 2024 because there were no open and fair Dem primaries. Yes, when there is no field, the field is indeed weak.

We had primaries in 2016 and 2020. I remember who I voted for and I remember the debates.

What happened last year is just the risk of having an 80 year old in the position. That’s about to be Trump. He can’t run again but if he could, that exact same scenario could have happened to him.

Biden’s problem wasn’t so much his age at first term but waiting too long before deciding not to run again. He waited too long and it screwed over his party.

At that age and in such a stressful position, the aging can happen rapidly. I don’t think it was a malicious decision. He literally ran during the campaign and brought his Peloton to the White House.

But isn’t that the problem with age? It may not have been malicious but age seems to have affected his decision making. I think the blame lies more with Jill and his other advisors precisely because his mental capacities have been impacted by age. A sad situation but his holding on too long absolutely cost Harris.

Exactly and our brilliant American voters fixed this problem by electing........ wait what?..... another unfit 78 year old person! Fool me once, shame on you.... fool me twice, shame on me. We must do better my fellow Americans. I still love you all.

Trump won’t be stressed. He doesn’t take the job seriously. He’ll pack his schedule full of “executive time” and trips to his resorts where he’ll charge secret service higher prices for their room and meals all while he takes bribes though his fake coin scheme.

Exactly, they are going to give him a big boy pen to make him feel important and occasionally pull his string when they decide what he should say. Same as last time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are people here comfortable with their daughters cuddling on the couch with a MAGA boyfriend to watch Squid Game?

Yes. He probably got her a blanket to keep warm and a holds her hand making her feel safe and appreciated.

We are raising men, not soy boys.

Wow. Maga men are the worst.

Listen to your fellow women!

https://youtube.com/shorts/CZH3uCoMHM4?si=UtYQ3bs3Zt3Q2pZV

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020.

Like who? The whole problem post debate fiasco was that there was no credible option to take on Trump who could actually win. Kamala was literally the best the party could come up with because the field is so incredibly weak. And it still is! Who is up next? Newsom who is never going to recover politically after the wildfires??

Back in the day we used to have these things called open and fair primaries where legitimate, pre-approved by the American people candidates emerged. This is where two term better than average presidents like Obama and Clinton come from. People that would never lose to a two-bit elderly reality TV personality like Trump. I can't tell you who that would have been in 2016, 2020, or 2024 because there were no open and fair Dem primaries. Yes, when there is no field, the field is indeed weak.

We had primaries in 2016 and 2020. I remember who I voted for and I remember the debates.

What happened last year is just the risk of having an 80 year old in the position. That’s about to be Trump. He can’t run again but if he could, that exact same scenario could have happened to him.

Biden’s problem wasn’t so much his age at first term but waiting too long before deciding not to run again. He waited too long and it screwed over his party.

At that age and in such a stressful position, the aging can happen rapidly. I don’t think it was a malicious decision. He literally ran during the campaign and brought his Peloton to the White House.

But isn’t that the problem with age? It may not have been malicious but age seems to have affected his decision making. I think the blame lies more with Jill and his other advisors precisely because his mental capacities have been impacted by age. A sad situation but his holding on too long absolutely cost Harris.

Exactly and our brilliant American voters fixed this problem by electing........ wait what?..... another unfit 78 year old person! Fool me once, shame on you.... fool me twice, shame on me. We must do better my fellow Americans. I still love you all.

Trump won’t be stressed. He doesn’t take the job seriously. He’ll pack his schedule full of “executive time” and trips to his resorts where he’ll charge secret service higher prices for their room and meals all while he takes bribes though his fake coin scheme.

Exactly, they are going to give him a big boy pen to make him feel important and occasionally pull his string when they decide what he should say. Same as last time.

Sorry, I have to call out the stupidity of the people that thought electing Biden would fix the Trump problem and the stupidity of the people that in turn thought electing Trump would fix the Biden problem. Do better folks. We're better than this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are you assuming everyone here thinks and votes the same way you do? You saw you’re all about diversity but when it comes to differences in thought, you fly off the handle.

Why do you want to live in an echo chamber? Why can’t you handle any different opinions?

Yes, comrade but we're talking to people who live here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are you assuming everyone here thinks and votes the same way you do? You saw you’re all about diversity but when it comes to differences in thought, you fly off the handle.

Why do you want to live in an echo chamber? Why can’t you handle any different opinions?

Yes, comrade but we're talking to people who live here.

Exactly, real Americans know that Trump and Biden are mistakes we must put behind us asap!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are you assuming everyone here thinks and votes the same way you do? You saw you’re all about diversity but when it comes to differences in thought, you fly off the handle.

Why do you want to live in an echo chamber? Why can’t you handle any different opinions?

Yes, comrade but we're talking to people who live here.

Exactly, real Americans know that Trump and Biden are mistakes we must put behind us asap!

Propaganda. Get out with the “both sides”. That’s what delivered Trump.