Why do you engage with MAGA on DCUM?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are people here comfortable with their daughters cuddling on the couch with a MAGA boyfriend to watch Squid Game?

Yes. He probably got her a blanket to keep warm and a holds her hand making her feel safe and appreciated.

We are raising men, not soy boys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

[Anonymous]

[url]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are people here comfortable with their daughters cuddling on the couch with a MAGA boyfriend to watch Squid Game?

My dd wouldn't be that stupid

+1. Good job to whatever parents are raising the hunky progressive demosons that date the girls at my DD's college. The Maga boys need to go find some Maga girls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020. We're talking about elderly incumbents with 40% job approval ratings here. One day, hopefully sooner than later, we'll have a real president again and you'll understand what people mean when they say Trump and Biden are NOT presidential people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We make your food at restaurants.

We teach your kids at school.

We coach your kids in club, high school and college sports.

We come when you call 911 for a crime, fire or medical emergency.

We’re your carpenter, electrician and plumber.

We deliver your mail and see what letters and magazines you get.

We’re your local politicians.

We’re your neighbors.

We’re your relatives.

We’re your sons.

We voted for change.

Trump didn't even get a majority of Americans to vote for him.

He got the majority of votes both popular and electoral college. Why do liberals keep acting like this wasn’t a wipeout election? You lost everything!

under 50% is not a majority of the popular vote. Stop the gaslighting.

Majority of the votes. Learn to read.

the word "plurality" is your friend. He did NOT get the "majority" of votes.

Please go look up the meaning of the word majority. TIA

Trump winning 29% of eligible voters is not even remotely a majority other than a majority of eligible voters who cast a ballot. Those who cast ballots do not speak for the 71% who didn't.

You win the award for dumbest voting analysis on the internet today.

No, my friend - dumb is assuming Trump has a strong and clear mandate from the American people, and assuming the GOP is on a winning path. Republicans barely have control of Congress and are likely to get destroyed and lose badly in the mid-terms between Trump reneging on everything he promised America (like cheaper groceries) and enacting even a fraction of his horrible agenda. To make that assumption would be MONUMENTALLY dumb.

I guess we will find out. Sort of like we found out the media was lying and making shit up when the truth was that Kamala has zero chance of winning this last election.

The media lying and making shit up is 100% of what FOX News, Newsmax, Breitbart, Daily Wire, Townhall, OANN, Daily Caller etc do...

Lol now do the mainstream media. How is CNN’s defamation fee looking?

Pretty tiny compared to what RWNJ media paid out for their lies about Dominion etc. Or did your fake RWNJ news not tell you that?

So sad and not funny to hear gullible partisan Americans continue to argue about which of their beloved "sides" is worse. Grow up people.

Bothsides it all you like, sure both sides are bad but going by the lawsuit payout numbers right wing media is objectively worse. Anyone who disputes that is opining without facts and I don't give a shit for opinions that can't be backed with facts, so you'd might as well not even bring it up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

"YOU'RE WRONG" says the MAGA who apparently still hasn't realized that Trump has already backed away from his promises to bring grocery prices back down. How about examining your own positions more closely?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

"YOU'RE WRONG" says the MAGA who apparently still hasn't realized that Trump has already backed away from his promises to bring grocery prices back down. How about examining your own positions more closely?

Still having trouble reading aren’t you? Saying something will be difficult doesn’t make it backing away no matter how many times you type it, even in unhinged capital letters. Let the man take office before you slam him for inadequacy. Maybe he will surprise you. We all want what’s best for this country and are grateful Biden got out of the way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We make your food at restaurants.

We teach your kids at school.

We coach your kids in club, high school and college sports.

We come when you call 911 for a crime, fire or medical emergency.

We’re your carpenter, electrician and plumber.

We deliver your mail and see what letters and magazines you get.

We’re your local politicians.

We’re your neighbors.

We’re your relatives.

We’re your sons.

We voted for change.

Trump didn't even get a majority of Americans to vote for him.

He got the majority of votes both popular and electoral college. Why do liberals keep acting like this wasn’t a wipeout election? You lost everything!

under 50% is not a majority of the popular vote. Stop the gaslighting.

Majority of the votes. Learn to read.

the word "plurality" is your friend. He did NOT get the "majority" of votes.

Please go look up the meaning of the word majority. TIA

Trump winning 29% of eligible voters is not even remotely a majority other than a majority of eligible voters who cast a ballot. Those who cast ballots do not speak for the 71% who didn't.

You win the award for dumbest voting analysis on the internet today.

No, my friend - dumb is assuming Trump has a strong and clear mandate from the American people, and assuming the GOP is on a winning path. Republicans barely have control of Congress and are likely to get destroyed and lose badly in the mid-terms between Trump reneging on everything he promised America (like cheaper groceries) and enacting even a fraction of his horrible agenda. To make that assumption would be MONUMENTALLY dumb.

I guess we will find out. Sort of like we found out the media was lying and making shit up when the truth was that Kamala has zero chance of winning this last election.

The media lying and making shit up is 100% of what FOX News, Newsmax, Breitbart, Daily Wire, Townhall, OANN, Daily Caller etc do...

Lol now do the mainstream media. How is CNN’s defamation fee looking?

Pretty tiny compared to what RWNJ media paid out for their lies about Dominion etc. Or did your fake RWNJ news not tell you that?

So sad and not funny to hear gullible partisan Americans continue to argue about which of their beloved "sides" is worse. Grow up people.

Bothsides it all you like, sure both sides are bad but going by the lawsuit payout numbers right wing media is objectively worse. Anyone who disputes that is opining without facts and I don't give a shit for opinions that can't be backed with facts, so you'd might as well not even bring it up.

No argument from me regarding which side is worse. It's fair to claim that the GOP is "worse" during the Trump era but the GOP isn't the party that LOST to Trump in 2 out of 3 elections.

So which is more pathetic? The party that nominated Trump 3 consecutive times or the party that lost to him in 2 out of 3 elections? The primary reason Trump was nominated 3 times is because the GOP party has become completely dysfunctional. The primary reason Trump won 2 out of 3 elections is because the party opposing him has become completely dysfunctional. The big picture isn't pretty but we all need to get it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

"YOU'RE WRONG" says the MAGA who apparently still hasn't realized that Trump has already backed away from his promises to bring grocery prices back down. How about examining your own positions more closely?

You are speaking to multiple posters although you keep insisting you aren’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We make your food at restaurants.

We teach your kids at school.

We coach your kids in club, high school and college sports.

We come when you call 911 for a crime, fire or medical emergency.

We’re your carpenter, electrician and plumber.

We deliver your mail and see what letters and magazines you get.

We’re your local politicians.

We’re your neighbors.

We’re your relatives.

We’re your sons.

We voted for change.

Trump didn't even get a majority of Americans to vote for him.

He got the majority of votes both popular and electoral college. Why do liberals keep acting like this wasn’t a wipeout election? You lost everything!

under 50% is not a majority of the popular vote. Stop the gaslighting.

Majority of the votes. Learn to read.

the word "plurality" is your friend. He did NOT get the "majority" of votes.

Please go look up the meaning of the word majority. TIA

Trump winning 29% of eligible voters is not even remotely a majority other than a majority of eligible voters who cast a ballot. Those who cast ballots do not speak for the 71% who didn't.

You win the award for dumbest voting analysis on the internet today.

No, my friend - dumb is assuming Trump has a strong and clear mandate from the American people, and assuming the GOP is on a winning path. Republicans barely have control of Congress and are likely to get destroyed and lose badly in the mid-terms between Trump reneging on everything he promised America (like cheaper groceries) and enacting even a fraction of his horrible agenda. To make that assumption would be MONUMENTALLY dumb.

I guess we will find out. Sort of like we found out the media was lying and making shit up when the truth was that Kamala has zero chance of winning this last election.

The media lying and making shit up is 100% of what FOX News, Newsmax, Breitbart, Daily Wire, Townhall, OANN, Daily Caller etc do...

Lol now do the mainstream media. How is CNN’s defamation fee looking?

Pretty tiny compared to what RWNJ media paid out for their lies about Dominion etc. Or did your fake RWNJ news not tell you that?

So sad and not funny to hear gullible partisan Americans continue to argue about which of their beloved "sides" is worse. Grow up people.

Bothsides it all you like, sure both sides are bad but going by the lawsuit payout numbers right wing media is objectively worse. Anyone who disputes that is opining without facts and I don't give a shit for opinions that can't be backed with facts, so you'd might as well not even bring it up.

If you actually believed your last line, you wouldn’t have attempted to suggest the media is only biased against the left in the first place. It was a laughable claim that deserved to be called out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020.

Like who? The whole problem post debate fiasco was that there was no credible option to take on Trump who could actually win. Kamala was literally the best the party could come up with because the field is so incredibly weak. And it still is! Who is up next? Newsom who is never going to recover politically after the wildfires??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020.

Like who? The whole problem post debate fiasco was that there was no credible option to take on Trump who could actually win. Kamala was literally the best the party could come up with because the field is so incredibly weak. And it still is! Who is up next? Newsom who is never going to recover politically after the wildfires??

Back in the day we used to have these things called open and fair primaries where legitimate, pre-approved by the American people candidates emerged. This is where two term better than average presidents like Obama and Clinton come from. People that would never lose to a two-bit elderly reality TV personality like Trump. I can't tell you who that would have been in 2016, 2020, or 2024 because there were no open and fair Dem primaries. Yes, when there is no field, the field is indeed weak.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020.

Like who? The whole problem post debate fiasco was that there was no credible option to take on Trump who could actually win. Kamala was literally the best the party could come up with because the field is so incredibly weak. And it still is! Who is up next? Newsom who is never going to recover politically after the wildfires??

Back in the day we used to have these things called open and fair primaries where legitimate, pre-approved by the American people candidates emerged. This is where two term better than average presidents like Obama and Clinton come from. People that would never lose to a two-bit elderly reality TV personality like Trump. I can't tell you who that would have been in 2016, 2020, or 2024 because there were no open and fair Dem primaries. Yes, when there is no field, the field is indeed weak.

We had primaries in 2016 and 2020. I remember who I voted for and I remember the debates.

What happened last year is just the risk of having an 80 year old in the position. That’s about to be Trump. He can’t run again but if he could, that exact same scenario could have happened to him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents.

As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.

Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong.

lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020.

Like who? The whole problem post debate fiasco was that there was no credible option to take on Trump who could actually win. Kamala was literally the best the party could come up with because the field is so incredibly weak. And it still is! Who is up next? Newsom who is never going to recover politically after the wildfires??

Back in the day we used to have these things called open and fair primaries where legitimate, pre-approved by the American people candidates emerged. This is where two term better than average presidents like Obama and Clinton come from. People that would never lose to a two-bit elderly reality TV personality like Trump. I can't tell you who that would have been in 2016, 2020, or 2024 because there were no open and fair Dem primaries. Yes, when there is no field, the field is indeed weak.

We had primaries in 2016 and 2020. I remember who I voted for and I remember the debates.

What happened last year is just the risk of having an 80 year old in the position. That’s about to be Trump. He can’t run again but if he could, that exact same scenario could have happened to him.

Biden’s problem wasn’t so much his age at first term but waiting too long before deciding not to run again. He waited too long and it screwed over his party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You're not our daughters, though?

We’re teaching your daughters.

We’re coaching your daughters.

We’re dating your daughters.

We’re married to your daughters.

We know many of your daughters align more with us, than you.

Daughters voted for change as well.

You voted for fraud. That's That's what you voted for and that's what you're going to get.

Not an original idea and a weak response. No wonder your daughters consider you a fraud.