Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Why do you engage with MAGA on DCUM?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m up with a sick child and have been reading quite a few threads the last hour. I am seeing a trend that looks very suspect - MAGA jumps in on a thread, another responds in support and then you engage. I think there are less than a handful of MAGA, they respond to themselves, and are attempting to make it look like they are all over the place in massive numbers (tracks). Syntax, punctuation, very limited ability to defend their point, and very old references indicate they are retired boomers trying to upset Gen X/millenials on this board. The last thread I read challenged calling 47 a hillbilly claiming one’s love for an actual Arkansas hillbilly - Clinton. Honey, I was in early elementary school when he was president. I don’t love nor do I think about him when speaking about recent presidents. As the title mentions, why do you respond back and engage with MAGA? I get it can feel good but wouldn’t it be amazing to watch them fade into the corner and die their impending boomer death asking why no one is looking at or talking to them? Whatever happened to not feeding the troll and scoffing at their uneducated rants? My secondhand embarrassment is so strong for them.[/quote] Maybe you and the Democratic Party should actually listen to people with opposing viewpoints if you want to win elections. Everyone on this board was so sure of Harris winning the election. This board was like an echo chamber. Any of us who supported Trump were shouted down. I said that you were not going to be able to change people’s opinions and convince the electorate that Trump was worse than Biden/Harris when we just experienced four years of prices rising ~20% and record illegal immigration. Yet, people on this board were so convinced that abortion was the winning issue and that people in this country hated Trump so much that they would support any alternative. Your theories were proven wrong. [/quote] lol... all the Dems needed was a chance to nominate a normal candidate in 2024 and Trump would have been crushed. Joe Biden lost the 2024 election for the Dem party and the country. Trump won nothing. Any babbling idiot could have beaten Biden and his unfortunate VP in 2024 just as any babbling idiot could have beaten Trump in 2020.[/quote] Like who? The whole problem post debate fiasco was that there was no credible option to take on Trump who could actually win. Kamala was literally the best the party could come up with because the field is so incredibly weak. And it still is! Who is up next? Newsom who is never going to recover politically after the wildfires??[/quote] Back in the day we used to have these things called open and fair primaries where legitimate, pre-approved by the American people candidates emerged. This is where two term better than average presidents like Obama and Clinton come from. People that would never lose to a two-bit elderly reality TV personality like Trump. I can't tell you who that would have been in 2016, 2020, or 2024 because there were no open and fair Dem primaries. Yes, when there is no field, the field is indeed weak. [/quote] We had primaries in 2016 and 2020. I remember who I voted for and I remember the debates. What happened last year is just the risk of having an 80 year old in the position. That’s about to be Trump. He can’t run again but if he could, that exact same scenario could have happened to him. [/quote] Biden’s problem wasn’t so much his age at first term but waiting too long before deciding not to run again. He waited too long and it screwed over his party.[/quote] At that age and in such a stressful position, the aging can happen rapidly. I don’t think it was a malicious decision. He literally ran during the campaign and brought his Peloton to the White House. [/quote] But isn’t that the problem with age? It may not have been malicious but age seems to have affected his decision making. I think the blame lies more with Jill and his other advisors precisely because his mental capacities have been impacted by age. A sad situation but his holding on too long absolutely cost Harris.[/quote] Exactly and our brilliant American voters fixed this problem by electing........ wait what?..... another unfit 78 year old person! Fool me once, shame on you.... fool me twice, shame on me. We must do better my fellow Americans. I still love you all.[/quote] Trump won’t be stressed. He doesn’t take the job seriously. He’ll pack his schedule full of “executive time” and trips to his resorts where he’ll charge secret service higher prices for their room and meals all while he takes bribes though his fake coin scheme. [/quote] Exactly, they are going to give him a big boy pen to make him feel important and occasionally pull his string when they decide what he should say. Same as last time.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics