When are you going to apologize to Youngkin for refusing him due process in a court of law? |
The credibility of not only them, but most institutions, are the lowest ever in American history. Most people would be surprised and in shock if they actually told the truth for once. |
Why, has Youngkin filed a lawsuit that the Court has refused to hear? Cite please. Meanwhile, he’s breaking federal law. So embarrassing for VA. And this car@p is not what VA wants from leaders. Youngkin wants Warners Senate seat. Any hope he had (which was small, because Warner is very moderate and very popular) is now gone. Virginia is moderate, good government, anti-Trump and anti -corruption. Youngkin is done here. And f Trump loses, he’s done, full stop. |
|
So... Knowing that it is...
1) a felony to keep a non citizen on the voter rolls in Virginia, and that 2) non citizens are not eligible to vote, therefore not covered under the 90 day period and can specifically be purged (or "corrected" as the language of the law says) at ANY time.... ..Let's suppose a person marks themselves as a non citizen. How is the State supposed to know the person's actual status as a citizen if the person also fails to respond to the notice that allows them to make a correction? And regardless of that answer, there's 11 pages here arguing we should keep all 6000 likely non citizens on the voter rolls (reminder, a felony) because some obscure scenario where it's possible an actual citizen failed to respond and was removed, even though that person is welcome to reregister if that did indeed happen? (DOJ did not seem able to produce an actual person who has been harmed, just vague suspicions and theoreticals). Good grief. Thanks for confirming. |
This is a very long way do saying you think Youngkin is above the law. The law allows removing noncitizens from the rolls, but does not allow systematic purges like the one he is requiring right now.that is removing citizens from the rolls I get it, you think it's NBD to remove some of ne from the rolls, all they have to do is respond to correct them! But what you fail to admit is that Yougkin's illegal order requires the removal of people who have already proved their citizenship. They can't not remove someone who has already shown they are citizens, this person has to go through the correction process over and over and over again. Requiring this so close to the election is illegal and Youngkin is committing voter fraud. |
[twitter]https://x.com/ElectProject/status/1845326397662953889?t=cFrZ2pM2y6BLy5GbdEHRLA&s=19[twitter] |
| I hope the media asks people who have had their name removed and see if they’re registered d or r, which could help build a case. |
PPs have already given examples of legal voters getting removed. Not everyone has the time and wherewithal to fight getting reinstated. |
Horse hockey! |
|
Youngkin’s election interference gets slapped down by a Federal judge, who notes that it is clearly illegal to purge voter rolls within 90 days of an election:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/10/25/youngkin-voting-law-injunction-noncitizens/ |
Being appealed |
| This will go to scotus. |
On what grounds? The law says in plain language that you cannot "clean up" voter rolls within 90 days of a federal election. They have 640 days to do their work. Further, they nullified the ability to vote for actual citizens who got caught up in their purge. |