
+1 well said and exactly correct. |
No I don’t cheer on protestors harassing Jewish restaurant owners just like I don’t cheer on the previous state official from the Bush and Obama administration harassing a street cart vendor and spewing Islamophobic statements asking if he rapes his daughter. I don’t support any such harassment but for you to solely focus on anti semitism and completely ignore the rampant Islamophobia shows your double standards. Still waiting on pictures or videos of posters and slogans by students of these universities in question where people have called for a genocide of Jews. |
![]() Nice job ignoring the post on the previous page that directly cites examples of support for Hamas (your previous criterion). You're not serious about this at all--just playing propaganda games. |
Jeff asked me to add this CNN article to the big Gaza thread, and I will do it. But a CNN journalist’s experience - over a full decade - covering Hamas by meeting with Hamas, in Gaza, belongs here too. Her insights are fascinating and worth considering, especially as she was there, on the ground, meeting face to face with Hamas: https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/07/opinions/israel-hamas-gaza-media-press-prusher/index.html Have the current college kids done their due-diligence? Do they know who they are are protesting for? Or, are they being mislead? |
Thank you. This was a good article and maybe, possibly, it could serve to inspire more carefully-considered responses on DCUM? |
+1 Everyone should read. |
The same question can be asked of anyone who supports Israel. If someone ask those question in America of Israel you lose your job and soon will be imprisoned. |
Re: the bolded, obviously, no one's going to jail for expressing their opinion. How exactly does being ridiculous help your cause? It's so dishonest. Just further damages your credibility. |
Wow. You’ve literally lost your mind. Insane. |
Imprisoned, huh? Did you hear that on YouTube, too? Try reading the article and considering how journalists have been presenting the sources of the information they publish. Or do you not "do" professionally-produced media? |
Really good article. |
+1 sounds like a very liberal Ivy professor |
Having a viewpoint and acting on a viewpoint are not the same thing. Essentially, this is what the university presidents were trying to articulate at the hearing. They attempted to articulate the balance of allowing freedom of thought while prohibiting criminal activity motivated by thought.
Gay, Magill, and Kornbluth were put into an impossible situation. Charged emotions, desires to dismantle higher education, and efforts to score cheap political points all worked in various ways to derail the possibility of any meaningful conversation or discussion. |
Sooo...if they don't act on it "in context," you have no problem with Klansmen spewing hatred of Blacks? |
Oh come on. Many, many people are called before Congress for very tricky situations and do fine overall, because they prepare well and aren’t arrogant. The problem is that these three aren’t used to any pushback and went in overconfident, underprepared, and arrogant. The real issue here is that these three have set up their own systems at the schools so they don’t ever have to encounter any real thought challenges. So, they weren’t prepared. Congressional witnesses can be prepared successfully, but the speakers have to approach the process with humility and that obviously didn’t happen here. |