Aliens and the government

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a ufo last week. It was a plane with a giant polar bear on its wing.

No wait, it was a Frontier flight from Charlotte.

How certain are you? Because if you aren't 100% certain, it's a UFO.

I see stars and birds and planes in the sky. Not 100% certain it's one or the others. Are those UFOs?

Yes. Those are UFOs and proof that non-human intelligence exists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a ufo last week. It was a plane with a giant polar bear on its wing.

No wait, it was a Frontier flight from Charlotte.

How certain are you? Because if you aren't 100% certain, it's a UFO.

I see stars and birds and planes in the sky. Not 100% certain it's one or the others. Are those UFOs?

Birds aren't real.

Kidding aside, just because you don't know what something in the sky or in someone's blurry video is, doesn't make it an alien ship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a ufo last week. It was a plane with a giant polar bear on its wing.

No wait, it was a Frontier flight from Charlotte.

How certain are you? Because if you aren't 100% certain, it's a UFO.

I see stars and birds and planes in the sky. Not 100% certain it's one or the others. Are those UFOs?

Birds aren't real.

Kidding aside, just because you don't know what something in the sky or in someone's blurry video is, doesn't make it an alien ship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a ufo last week. It was a plane with a giant polar bear on its wing.

No wait, it was a Frontier flight from Charlotte.

How certain are you? Because if you aren't 100% certain, it's a UFO.

I see stars and birds and planes in the sky. Not 100% certain it's one or the others. Are those UFOs?

Yes. Those are UFOs and proof that non-human intelligence exists.

This is sarcasm, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a ufo last week. It was a plane with a giant polar bear on its wing.

No wait, it was a Frontier flight from Charlotte.

How certain are you? Because if you aren't 100% certain, it's a UFO.

I see stars and birds and planes in the sky. Not 100% certain it's one or the others. Are those UFOs?

Yes. Those are UFOs and proof that non-human intelligence exists.

This is sarcasm, right?

Yep. They know that there’s nothing else in the universe. That’s the end of the story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a ufo last week. It was a plane with a giant polar bear on its wing.

No wait, it was a Frontier flight from Charlotte.

How certain are you? Because if you aren't 100% certain, it's a UFO.

I see stars and birds and planes in the sky. Not 100% certain it's one or the others. Are those UFOs?

Yes. Those are UFOs and proof that non-human intelligence exists.

No. You are totally wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have a feeling the results of congressional inquiry into the tantalizing allegations should be known and public in the not too distant future. Like 6-18 months.

We'll then know if Grusch is off his rocker or not.

Right now, it's too early to tell.

Um, about Grusch…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a ufo last week. It was a plane with a giant polar bear on its wing.

No wait, it was a Frontier flight from Charlotte.

How certain are you? Because if you aren't 100% certain, it's a UFO.

I see stars and birds and planes in the sky. Not 100% certain it's one or the others. Are those UFOs?

Yes. Those are UFOs and proof that non-human intelligence exists.

This is sarcasm, right?

Yep. They know that there’s nothing else in the universe. That’s the end of the story.

It's likely there is. But UFOs aren't proof of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a feeling the results of congressional inquiry into the tantalizing allegations should be known and public in the not too distant future. Like 6-18 months.

We'll then know if Grusch is off his rocker or not.

Right now, it's too early to tell.

Um, about Grusch…

I mean ... okay, maybe this guy isn't entirely stable. Alcoholism will do that. But this brings up a point that's ignored, and that is that he is HARDLY the only individual around.

I've never seen a UFO or whatever the hell they're newly named. But I tend to believe that pilots, astronauts, and other highly credible individuals who are seeing something, are in fact seeing something. It's also a known fact the U.S. government has been trying to discredit any individual who steps forward.

And on that note, peace out.

[Anonymous]

That’s a straight up hit piece on Grusch, who suffered PTSD from his military service.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That’s a straight up hit piece on Grusch, who suffered PTSD from his military service.

+1 It’s the same smear as ever, and if there were no there there, what would be the need of smearing someone?

And who got into his personal files? Isn’t there some expectation of HIPAA or privacy? He could have grounds for a lawsuit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a feeling the results of congressional inquiry into the tantalizing allegations should be known and public in the not too distant future. Like 6-18 months.

We'll then know if Grusch is off his rocker or not.

Right now, it's too early to tell.

Um, about Grusch…

I mean ... okay, maybe this guy isn't entirely stable. Alcoholism will do that. But this brings up a point that's ignored, and that is that he is HARDLY the only individual around.

I've never seen a UFO or whatever the hell they're newly named. But I tend to believe that pilots, astronauts, and other highly credible individuals who are seeing something, are in fact seeing something. It's also a known fact the U.S. government has been trying to discredit any individual who steps forward.

And on that note, peace out.

The deniers on this thread know everything, so we needn’t trouble them with this kind of point. They’re content to imply that all the credible people who have more experience with flying and seeing other flying things are dumb toads who are confusing birds and balloons with UFOs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s a straight up hit piece on Grusch, who suffered PTSD from his military service.

+1 It’s the same smear as ever, and if there were no there there, what would be the need of smearing someone?

And who got into his personal files? Isn’t there some expectation of HIPAA or privacy? He could have grounds for a lawsuit.

The reporter literally tells you how that happened: FOIA requests to the Loudoun County Sheriff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That’s a straight up hit piece on Grusch, who suffered PTSD from his military service.

PTSD from Air Force?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s a straight up hit piece on Grusch, who suffered PTSD from his military service.

+1 It’s the same smear as ever, and if there were no there there, what would be the need of smearing someone?

And who got into his personal files? Isn’t there some expectation of HIPAA or privacy? He could have grounds for a lawsuit.

The reporter literally tells you how that happened: FOIA requests to the Loudoun County Sheriff.

How did the reporter know to approach LCSO? Who would have tipped him off? Someone must have involved LCSO, but this sounds like an inside information sort of thing.