|
https://www.gwern.net/docs/sociology/2021-hopcroft.pdf
The study in question and back to the topic at hand and conclusions “Income for women was either unrelated or negatively related to long term mating or success in reproduction” |
Sounds like it is rather you that wants to live in fantasyland. |
How much money do you have to make for money to “no longer be an issue”? The biglaw associates I have known all still prioritized a spouse with an income. |
| Male here, I don’t care how much she makes. Absolutely a zero factor. |
Okay but how old are you? |
I don’t know whether you are the same or different posters but a poster keeps insinuating that whoever says they don’t care about money are older. I actually think you are too young if you are talking about law associates. It is true that assortive mating means highly educated high income potential men may marry similar women of education status. The clincher comes in when the children come. Suddenly all the women law associates start dropping out and you find more highly educated SAHMs. Two people making 200000 need the income for a UMC life. Once a man starts making 500k that consideration drops away. The woman can have that fancy degree as a status symbol but income is irrelevant. And if the lady is hideous it doesn’t matter how many degrees she has or money. It’s just the way of the world. |
I don’t see many women in dual biglaw lawyer (or lawyer-banker) couples dropping out entirely with kids. Instead they seem to go into jobs that have good quality of life but are still interesting. Lots of young partners are married to women with interesting but less demanding jobs. |
That’s also an option. Hobby jobs that are interesting but don’t make a lot of money. That doesn’t support the statement of this thread - high earning men want women with high incomes. |
Uh... I'm 41 |
But they do, when they're picking out a spouse. It's an insurance policy. Some of them "cash" the policy (two big fed lawyers, as an example) and some don't (SAHM with an MBA from Kellogg). |
How much do you make/net worth? |
Actually, someone whose peers are biglaw associates are exactly the relevant age group to understand what is going on "now." The commenter who is 41 is probably married, divorced, or a "time waster" single old guy who is still irrelevant to the question at hand about dating trends. |
NP. Had to laugh at this. I married DW because she’s smoking hot and smarter than me (albeit not higher earning at the moment because she’s staying home with DC). She’s also batsh*t crazy, but I love her. |
Nothing crazy. Together we make about 400k, which is of course huge for most people, but not big law partner money. My wife makes a little more than me. I can’t say that I am happier now then when we had nothing. More money, more stress, less freedom. |
Actually the OP included "potential" in that statement. That is key. I don't see a lot of highly educated successful people married to low potential uneducated spouses just because they were kind or hot and had nothing else to offer. |