Is Georgetown really that much better than BC?

Anonymous
Why do people care which one is “better”? Outside of Gtown SFS, there is probably nothing you can’t do with a BC degree than with a Gtown one. And Boston is a way better city than DC.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yo crazy ND booster — lots of local kids, competitive for top 20 schools, are passing on ND. DD and friends just last night said they were relieved they never considered going to school in Indiana. ND can be a great school for some and others can choose to skip it. It’s fine. This should not rock your world. No need to challenge every single poster who mentions that it’s not on their kid’s list. More room for you and yours.


Yet another weirdo parent listening in on her children and their friends. So odd.

Crazy ND booster: it’s not listening “in” it’s listening to and talking with — this was a conversation among the girls AND moms. Clearly something you don’t understand. Converse with these 17 yr olds — they have a lot to say.


Yea, I'm sure the girls and their friends love their mothers breathing down their necks about colleges on a summer evening. You clearly are one of THOSE people. I feel sorry for the girls.

Considering yesterday’s news, we’ve been parts of lots of conversation about Indiana. Try it.


Indiana's abortion laws are not going to affect ND's applications.


You're mostly right, I'm sure. But it is affecting my kid's list and the lists of her friends.


Wonderful! Less competition for my DC!

Congrats. May be the last free choice you have. Good luck in Indiana.


We're pro life, so it works well for us!
Anonymous
The question was not about ND or Indiana or abortion.

OP- I agree. There are many similarities between BC and GU. Student stats are quite similar.
SAT 25- 75
BC 1370-1490
GU 1370-1530

I hope you find a school your DC enjoys.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yo crazy ND booster — lots of local kids, competitive for top 20 schools, are passing on ND. DD and friends just last night said they were relieved they never considered going to school in Indiana. ND can be a great school for some and others can choose to skip it. It’s fine. This should not rock your world. No need to challenge every single poster who mentions that it’s not on their kid’s list. More room for you and yours.


Yet another weirdo parent listening in on her children and their friends. So odd.

Crazy ND booster: it’s not listening “in” it’s listening to and talking with — this was a conversation among the girls AND moms. Clearly something you don’t understand. Converse with these 17 yr olds — they have a lot to say.


Yea, I'm sure the girls and their friends love their mothers breathing down their necks about colleges on a summer evening. You clearly are one of THOSE people. I feel sorry for the girls.

Considering yesterday’s news, we’ve been parts of lots of conversation about Indiana. Try it.


Indiana's abortion laws are not going to affect ND's applications.


You're mostly right, I'm sure. But it is affecting my kid's list and the lists of her friends.


Wonderful! Less competition for my DC!

Congrats. May be the last free choice you have. Good luck in Indiana.


We're pro life, so it works well for us!

We're all pro life. Not one of us is pro-death. Hopefully your daughter won't be in need of womens' health services while she's in Indiana.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I agree with ND >= GU > BC > HC. Only on DCUM would anyone debate these points. Selectivity matters, because the quality of your fellow students has a tremendous impact on the quality of the education. Sure, it is not everything, but it is important, and the differences in selectivity are huge between these schools.
BC’s undergrad business program is not better than GU’s. Neither is ND’s (at best they would be equal).
BC is on the rise and has a lot going for it, including being fun.
HC is solid academically.

Since selectivity is important, let’s look at BC’s real competition: the other selective universities in greater Boston. Harvard and MIT are in a different world, of course. BC’s real competition is BU, Northeastern, and Tufts. Admissions data is from last year (currently on US News): BU and Northeastern are 20%, Tufts is 16%, and BC is 26%. BC’s selectivity is not “on the rise” compared to this competition. (Northeastern is the school “on the rise” there, and that rise will only continue.) I don’t think selectivity is everything either: BC in my mind is just as or more “prestigious” than Northeastern and BU (though not Tufts). I am simply making the point that the BC/Georgetown “on par” analysis has to factor in internecine battles for prestige where a college is located. (Call this a local battle over future selectivity in the face of a New England demographic crisis, which is exactly what it is.) On that criterion, BC does not fare at all well — and Georgetown does.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yo crazy ND booster — lots of local kids, competitive for top 20 schools, are passing on ND. DD and friends just last night said they were relieved they never considered going to school in Indiana. ND can be a great school for some and others can choose to skip it. It’s fine. This should not rock your world. No need to challenge every single poster who mentions that it’s not on their kid’s list. More room for you and yours.


Yet another weirdo parent listening in on her children and their friends. So odd.

Crazy ND booster: it’s not listening “in” it’s listening to and talking with — this was a conversation among the girls AND moms. Clearly something you don’t understand. Converse with these 17 yr olds — they have a lot to say.


Yea, I'm sure the girls and their friends love their mothers breathing down their necks about colleges on a summer evening. You clearly are one of THOSE people. I feel sorry for the girls.

Considering yesterday’s news, we’ve been parts of lots of conversation about Indiana. Try it.


Indiana's abortion laws are not going to affect ND's applications.


You're mostly right, I'm sure. But it is affecting my kid's list and the lists of her friends.



Wonderful! Less competition for my DC!

Congrats. May be the last free choice you have. Good luck in Indiana.


We're pro life, so it works well for us!

We're all pro life. Not one of us is pro-death. Hopefully your daughter won't be in need of womens' health services while she's in Indiana.


Nuance is not your thing. It's not all or nothing and I'm pro baby blending. People like you are what makes this conversation so difficult.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I agree with ND >= GU > BC > HC. Only on DCUM would anyone debate these points. Selectivity matters, because the quality of your fellow students has a tremendous impact on the quality of the education. Sure, it is not everything, but it is important, and the differences in selectivity are huge between these schools.
BC’s undergrad business program is not better than GU’s. Neither is ND’s (at best they would be equal).
BC is on the rise and has a lot going for it, including being fun.
HC is solid academically.

Since selectivity is important, let’s look at BC’s real competition: the other selective universities in greater Boston. Harvard and MIT are in a different world, of course. BC’s real competition is BU, Northeastern, and Tufts. Admissions data is from last year (currently on US News): BU and Northeastern are 20%, Tufts is 16%, and BC is 26%. BC’s selectivity is not “on the rise” compared to this competition. (Northeastern is the school “on the rise” there, and that rise will only continue.) I don’t think selectivity is everything either: BC in my mind is just as or more “prestigious” than Northeastern and BU (though not Tufts). I am simply making the point that the BC/Georgetown “on par” analysis has to factor in internecine battles for prestige where a college is located. (Call this a local battle over future selectivity in the face of a New England demographic crisis, which is exactly what it is.) On that criterion, BC does not fare at all well — and Georgetown does.


Just because schools are close to each other geographically doesn't mean those schools are the "real" competition. To use just one example, I can virtually guarantee that BC's administration considers both ND and GT to be bigger competitors for students than Tufts.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I agree with ND >= GU > BC > HC. Only on DCUM would anyone debate these points. Selectivity matters, because the quality of your fellow students has a tremendous impact on the quality of the education. Sure, it is not everything, but it is important, and the differences in selectivity are huge between these schools.
BC’s undergrad business program is not better than GU’s. Neither is ND’s (at best they would be equal).
BC is on the rise and has a lot going for it, including being fun.
HC is solid academically.

Since selectivity is important, let’s look at BC’s real competition: the other selective universities in greater Boston. Harvard and MIT are in a different world, of course. BC’s real competition is BU, Northeastern, and Tufts. Admissions data is from last year (currently on US News): BU and Northeastern are 20%, Tufts is 16%, and BC is 26%. BC’s selectivity is not “on the rise” compared to this competition. (Northeastern is the school “on the rise” there, and that rise will only continue.) I don’t think selectivity is everything either: BC in my mind is just as or more “prestigious” than Northeastern and BU (though not Tufts). I am simply making the point that the BC/Georgetown “on par” analysis has to factor in internecine battles for prestige where a college is located. (Call this a local battle over future selectivity in the face of a New England demographic crisis, which is exactly what it is.) On that criterion, BC does not fare at all well — and Georgetown does.


Just because schools are close to each other geographically doesn't mean those schools are the "real" competition. To use just one example, I can virtually guarantee that BC's administration considers both ND and GT to be bigger competitors for students than Tufts.


Agreed - I went to BC and never considered Tufts and would not have wanted to go there. The culture and day to day life at these two schools are so different.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I agree with ND >= GU > BC > HC. Only on DCUM would anyone debate these points. Selectivity matters, because the quality of your fellow students has a tremendous impact on the quality of the education. Sure, it is not everything, but it is important, and the differences in selectivity are huge between these schools.
BC’s undergrad business program is not better than GU’s. Neither is ND’s (at best they would be equal).
BC is on the rise and has a lot going for it, including being fun.
HC is solid academically.

Since selectivity is important, let’s look at BC’s real competition: the other selective universities in greater Boston. Harvard and MIT are in a different world, of course. BC’s real competition is BU, Northeastern, and Tufts. Admissions data is from last year (currently on US News): BU and Northeastern are 20%, Tufts is 16%, and BC is 26%. BC’s selectivity is not “on the rise” compared to this competition. (Northeastern is the school “on the rise” there, and that rise will only continue.) I don’t think selectivity is everything either: BC in my mind is just as or more “prestigious” than Northeastern and BU (though not Tufts). I am simply making the point that the BC/Georgetown “on par” analysis has to factor in internecine battles for prestige where a college is located. (Call this a local battle over future selectivity in the face of a New England demographic crisis, which is exactly what it is.) On that criterion, BC does not fare at all well — and Georgetown does.


Just because schools are close to each other geographically doesn't mean those schools are the "real" competition. To use just one example, I can virtually guarantee that BC's administration considers both ND and GT to be bigger competitors for students than Tufts.


The schools that BC lists as the highest number of cross applicants are:
Villanova University
Georgetown University
Northeastern University
University of Notre Dame
University of Virginia
University of Pennsylvania
Brown University
Boston University
Harvard University
Cornell University
Duke University
University of Michigan
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yo crazy ND booster — lots of local kids, competitive for top 20 schools, are passing on ND. DD and friends just last night said they were relieved they never considered going to school in Indiana. ND can be a great school for some and others can choose to skip it. It’s fine. This should not rock your world. No need to challenge every single poster who mentions that it’s not on their kid’s list. More room for you and yours.


Yet another weirdo parent listening in on her children and their friends. So odd.

Crazy ND booster: it’s not listening “in” it’s listening to and talking with — this was a conversation among the girls AND moms. Clearly something you don’t understand. Converse with these 17 yr olds — they have a lot to say.


Yea, I'm sure the girls and their friends love their mothers breathing down their necks about colleges on a summer evening. You clearly are one of THOSE people. I feel sorry for the girls.

Considering yesterday’s news, we’ve been parts of lots of conversation about Indiana. Try it.


Indiana's abortion laws are not going to affect ND's applications.


You're mostly right, I'm sure. But it is affecting my kid's list and the lists of her friends.


Wonderful! Less competition for my DC!

Congrats. May be the last free choice you have. Good luck in Indiana.


We're pro life, so it works well for us!

We're all pro life. Not one of us is pro-death. Hopefully your daughter won't be in need of womens' health services while she's in Indiana.


She would never seek an abortion if that’s what you mean. She would carry to term before doing that. But you do you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yo crazy ND booster — lots of local kids, competitive for top 20 schools, are passing on ND. DD and friends just last night said they were relieved they never considered going to school in Indiana. ND can be a great school for some and others can choose to skip it. It’s fine. This should not rock your world. No need to challenge every single poster who mentions that it’s not on their kid’s list. More room for you and yours.


Yet another weirdo parent listening in on her children and their friends. So odd.

Crazy ND booster: it’s not listening “in” it’s listening to and talking with — this was a conversation among the girls AND moms. Clearly something you don’t understand. Converse with these 17 yr olds — they have a lot to say.


Yea, I'm sure the girls and their friends love their mothers breathing down their necks about colleges on a summer evening. You clearly are one of THOSE people. I feel sorry for the girls.

Considering yesterday’s news, we’ve been parts of lots of conversation about Indiana. Try it.


Indiana's abortion laws are not going to affect ND's applications.


You're mostly right, I'm sure. But it is affecting my kid's list and the lists of her friends.
Wonderful! Less competition for my DC!

Congrats. May be the last free choice you have. Good luck in Indiana.


We're pro life, so it works well for us!

We're all pro life. Not one of us is pro-death. Hopefully your daughter won't be in need of womens' health services while she's in Indiana.


She would never seek an abortion if that’s what you mean. She would carry to term before doing that. But you do you.

Because the only possible outcomes are abortion or healthy pregnancy and delivery? But you go ahead and educate yourself.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I agree with ND >= GU > BC > HC. Only on DCUM would anyone debate these points. Selectivity matters, because the quality of your fellow students has a tremendous impact on the quality of the education. Sure, it is not everything, but it is important, and the differences in selectivity are huge between these schools.
BC’s undergrad business program is not better than GU’s. Neither is ND’s (at best they would be equal).
BC is on the rise and has a lot going for it, including being fun.
HC is solid academically.

Since selectivity is important, let’s look at BC’s real competition: the other selective universities in greater Boston. Harvard and MIT are in a different world, of course. BC’s real competition is BU, Northeastern, and Tufts. Admissions data is from last year (currently on US News): BU and Northeastern are 20%, Tufts is 16%, and BC is 26%. BC’s selectivity is not “on the rise” compared to this competition. (Northeastern is the school “on the rise” there, and that rise will only continue.) I don’t think selectivity is everything either: BC in my mind is just as or more “prestigious” than Northeastern and BU (though not Tufts). I am simply making the point that the BC/Georgetown “on par” analysis has to factor in internecine battles for prestige where a college is located. (Call this a local battle over future selectivity in the face of a New England demographic crisis, which is exactly what it is.) On that criterion, BC does not fare at all well — and Georgetown does.


Just because schools are close to each other geographically doesn't mean those schools are the "real" competition. To use just one example, I can virtually guarantee that BC's administration considers both ND and GT to be bigger competitors for students than Tufts.


The schools that BC lists as the highest number of cross applicants are:
Villanova University
Georgetown University
Northeastern University
University of Notre Dame
University of Virginia
University of Pennsylvania
Brown University
Boston University
Harvard University
Cornell University
Duke University
University of Michigan

I think I'd like the "lower" of this list for DS, assuming that includes BC, Villanova & UMichigan; GT & UVA would be REACH, but interesting. No interest in ND.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yo crazy ND booster — lots of local kids, competitive for top 20 schools, are passing on ND. DD and friends just last night said they were relieved they never considered going to school in Indiana. ND can be a great school for some and others can choose to skip it. It’s fine. This should not rock your world. No need to challenge every single poster who mentions that it’s not on their kid’s list. More room for you and yours.


Yet another weirdo parent listening in on her children and their friends. So odd.

Crazy ND booster: it’s not listening “in” it’s listening to and talking with — this was a conversation among the girls AND moms. Clearly something you don’t understand. Converse with these 17 yr olds — they have a lot to say.


Yea, I'm sure the girls and their friends love their mothers breathing down their necks about colleges on a summer evening. You clearly are one of THOSE people. I feel sorry for the girls.

Considering yesterday’s news, we’ve been parts of lots of conversation about Indiana. Try it.


Indiana's abortion laws are not going to affect ND's applications.


You're mostly right, I'm sure. But it is affecting my kid's list and the lists of her friends.
Wonderful! Less competition for my DC!

Congrats. May be the last free choice you have. Good luck in Indiana.


We're pro life, so it works well for us!

We're all pro life. Not one of us is pro-death. Hopefully your daughter won't be in need of womens' health services while she's in Indiana.


She would never seek an abortion if that’s what you mean. She would carry to term before doing that. But you do you.

Because the only possible outcomes are abortion or healthy pregnancy and delivery? But you go ahead and educate yourself.


Look, I would zap a baby for convenience all day long cause I'm just wired that way. I do admit though that birth control is plentiful, cheap and pretty reliable. Should I get pregnant on plentiful, cheap and reliable birth control and can't figure it out in acceptable baby zapping time to the point where it is a danger to my life than that becomes a medical procedure beyond elective surgery to correct a mistake.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I agree with ND >= GU > BC > HC. Only on DCUM would anyone debate these points. Selectivity matters, because the quality of your fellow students has a tremendous impact on the quality of the education. Sure, it is not everything, but it is important, and the differences in selectivity are huge between these schools.
BC’s undergrad business program is not better than GU’s. Neither is ND’s (at best they would be equal).
BC is on the rise and has a lot going for it, including being fun.
HC is solid academically.

Since selectivity is important, let’s look at BC’s real competition: the other selective universities in greater Boston. Harvard and MIT are in a different world, of course. BC’s real competition is BU, Northeastern, and Tufts. Admissions data is from last year (currently on US News): BU and Northeastern are 20%, Tufts is 16%, and BC is 26%. BC’s selectivity is not “on the rise” compared to this competition. (Northeastern is the school “on the rise” there, and that rise will only continue.) I don’t think selectivity is everything either: BC in my mind is just as or more “prestigious” than Northeastern and BU (though not Tufts). I am simply making the point that the BC/Georgetown “on par” analysis has to factor in internecine battles for prestige where a college is located. (Call this a local battle over future selectivity in the face of a New England demographic crisis, which is exactly what it is.) On that criterion, BC does not fare at all well — and Georgetown does.


Just because schools are close to each other geographically doesn't mean those schools are the "real" competition. To use just one example, I can virtually guarantee that BC's administration considers both ND and GT to be bigger competitors for students than Tufts.


The schools that BC lists as the highest number of cross applicants are:
Villanova University
Georgetown University
Northeastern University
University of Notre Dame
University of Virginia
University of Pennsylvania
Brown University
Boston University
Harvard University
Cornell University
Duke University
University of Michigan

I think I'd like the "lower" of this list for DS, assuming that includes BC, Villanova & UMichigan; GT & UVA would be REACH, but interesting. No interest in ND.


Lol no interest in ND because there’s no way “DS” is getting in if he’s a reach for GT and UVA. So, yea, best that you focus on the “lower end.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I agree with ND >= GU > BC > HC. Only on DCUM would anyone debate these points. Selectivity matters, because the quality of your fellow students has a tremendous impact on the quality of the education. Sure, it is not everything, but it is important, and the differences in selectivity are huge between these schools.
BC’s undergrad business program is not better than GU’s. Neither is ND’s (at best they would be equal).
BC is on the rise and has a lot going for it, including being fun.
HC is solid academically.

Since selectivity is important, let’s look at BC’s real competition: the other selective universities in greater Boston. Harvard and MIT are in a different world, of course. BC’s real competition is BU, Northeastern, and Tufts. Admissions data is from last year (currently on US News): BU and Northeastern are 20%, Tufts is 16%, and BC is 26%. BC’s selectivity is not “on the rise” compared to this competition. (Northeastern is the school “on the rise” there, and that rise will only continue.) I don’t think selectivity is everything either: BC in my mind is just as or more “prestigious” than Northeastern and BU (though not Tufts). I am simply making the point that the BC/Georgetown “on par” analysis has to factor in internecine battles for prestige where a college is located. (Call this a local battle over future selectivity in the face of a New England demographic crisis, which is exactly what it is.) On that criterion, BC does not fare at all well — and Georgetown does.


Just because schools are close to each other geographically doesn't mean those schools are the "real" competition. To use just one example, I can virtually guarantee that BC's administration considers both ND and GT to be bigger competitors for students than Tufts.


The schools that BC lists as the highest number of cross applicants are:
Villanova University
Georgetown University
Northeastern University
University of Notre Dame
University of Virginia
University of Pennsylvania
Brown University
Boston University
Harvard University
Cornell University
Duke University
University of Michigan

I think I'd like the "lower" of this list for DS, assuming that includes BC, Villanova & UMichigan; GT & UVA would be REACH, but interesting. No interest in ND.


Lol no interest in ND because there’s no way “DS” is getting in if he’s a reach for GT and UVA. So, yea, best that you focus on the “lower end.”


NP...and this is why you people are viewed with disdain. This is a superfluous comment and in no way helpful to the conversation. While ND is a perfectly fine school it is not the Holy Grail...in fact they still can't hold their own in modern day football.
Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Go to: