| Quoting isn't working, but replying to comment about redshirted February birthday. That's insane. I know 1 March redshirt and several Apr and May redshirts and that's bad enough. June is even pushing it. |
| To the pp, Im glad you were the youngest and did well but once again, were you 12-15 months younger or 6-9 months younger than all your peers? Also you grew up in a different time. We are talking anout 2022. All kids are impacted differently. Your child is doing great, that is wonderful. There are other kids who would benefit from being in a grade with kids who are closer in age developmentally but may not have that opportunity depending on the amt of redshirting in their grade, and their birthday. Each kids situation will be unique and different so all these anecdotes dont really mean much. |
That made me laugh out loud, especially the last sentence!!! So funny! |
| All states should do what New York did and ban it. That would solve this whole ridiculous problem. |
|
I’m the PP who was the youngest by more than what people are freaking out about here. Let me clarify the math. I am a late Dec. birthday and started in a school with a Dec. 31st cutoff. A few years later we moved to a school that had a soft June 1 cutoff. So I was typically at least six months younger than my classmates and often more. Private school K-12.
I’m going to stop posting now, though, because it’s clear to me the anti-redshirters have no interest in actually hearing anything other than “you are 100% right all the time.” So here you go: you are 100% right all the time. Good luck to you. I think you are going to really need it over the years. |
Don’t let the door hit you in the a$$. |
Your one anecdotal story at a k-12 is not relevant. |
Your one anecdotal story at a K-12 is not relevant. I know you say childish things because you are having a fit that you want to be important. |
+1 |
I don't even really think there's a "right or a wrong" but I would think most people could agree that a 16-18 mo gap in the same grade is kind of a lot and certainly not the intent/norm from when most of us parents were growing up. |
| Yes exactly PP! Exactly what you said. |
What problem? That some people don't like it doesn't make it a huge issue demanding action. Where exactly is this a problem? I've known a few kids who could potentially be 18 mos older in some of my kid's classes but I fail to see the glaring problem. It's not holding my kids back or hurting them in anyway so why should I or anyone care? Instead of anecdotes cite a source that this is a ridiculous issue that needs immediate action and why. |
Parents did the same thing when we were growing up, especially those who expected their kids to get scholarships. I'd rather save the money from an extra year of preschool/child care and use that money for college. |
Agreed on the money. However, growing up (I'm 40) the only kids I knew that were held back were August babies. I think I knew one late July baby held back. Definitely no spring babies. Redshirting has always existed, sure, but not to the extent that it is now. If anything, I knew more stories of parents trying to get their fall kid enrolled early (myself included). But public school wouldn't allow it. The thought process definitely seems to have changed. I also live in the same area that I grew up in, so it's not like it's a regional thing. |
|
I guess I am a May redshirt.
3rd kid, first time I have done it. However, he was suggested as not kinder ready but his Prek teacher (one of two in the class). He academically fine. He’s socially not doing great with listening and being as independent. Has improved over the year, but still not showing nearly as much readiness. Well do a PreK class again; it’s meant for re-takers, and won’t be the exact same. He is short and always will be, based on genes. So he’s not going to stick out. I am a little worried the academic stuff will be boring eventually, but they push kindergartners! So, he’ll be able to keep up. |