Thread about Pyle / Racism?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank you for confirming that you think being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism. As I said, that's a weird take.

I never said such a thing let alone confirmed it. That is purely a figment of your imagination. What I did do is ask you a pretty simple question which you have twice avoided answering. I wonder what is difficult about this question?

Anonymous wrote:
And it's pretty clear that DCUM opposes diversity of ideas. There are plenty of POC who see CRT for the toxic, racist garbage it is. Check out John McWhorter for some insight. Most moderate Democrats like me also oppose it. Many of my progressive friends also oppose it. So it seems that the people who support it are a very narrow band of super-progressives. And don't you see the irony in what you wrote last? Proponents of CRT/DEI are the ones holding separate forums for different races, not classic liberals who would never.

You actually have no understanding of CRT which is one reason I have no interest in seeing you spew misinformation. Whatever POC who oppose CRT are welcome to speak for themselves. They certainly don't need a butt hurt white person such as yourself speaking on their behalf.

Of course you did. It was in the very question you asked. If you didn't believe that being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism you would not have asked the question. But yes Jeff, we have all been the victims of racism. But lets pretend for a moment that I haven't been a victim of racism. What then?

CRT is looking at everything through a racial lens and then categorizing it as oppressed or oppressor...which is insane.

And OK. https://johnmcwhorter.substack.com/p/todays-elect-left-is-as-anti-science (just FYI, "the elect" is JM's pet name for wokes)

You can have opinions about racism without being a victim of racism. For instance, I have very strong opinions about racism but, to my knowledge, have not been a victim of racism. I asked if you were a victim of racism because you are a text book example of white fragility. The mere suggestion that you you might in the least way be inconvenienced in the name of equality or diversity is enough to send you over the edge. Everything you have posted since has only confirmed my initial suspicion.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank you for confirming that you think being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism. As I said, that's a weird take.

I never said such a thing let alone confirmed it. That is purely a figment of your imagination. What I did do is ask you a pretty simple question which you have twice avoided answering. I wonder what is difficult about this question?

Anonymous wrote:
And it's pretty clear that DCUM opposes diversity of ideas. There are plenty of POC who see CRT for the toxic, racist garbage it is. Check out John McWhorter for some insight. Most moderate Democrats like me also oppose it. Many of my progressive friends also oppose it. So it seems that the people who support it are a very narrow band of super-progressives. And don't you see the irony in what you wrote last? Proponents of CRT/DEI are the ones holding separate forums for different races, not classic liberals who would never.

You actually have no understanding of CRT which is one reason I have no interest in seeing you spew misinformation. Whatever POC who oppose CRT are welcome to speak for themselves. They certainly don't need a butt hurt white person such as yourself speaking on their behalf.

Of course you did. It was in the very question you asked. If you didn't believe that being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism you would not have asked the question. But yes Jeff, we have all been the victims of racism. But lets pretend for a moment that I haven't been a victim of racism. What then?

CRT is looking at everything through a racial lens and then categorizing it as oppressed or oppressor...which is insane.

And OK. https://johnmcwhorter.substack.com/p/todays-elect-left-is-as-anti-science (just FYI, "the elect" is JM's pet name for wokes)

You can have opinions about racism without being a victim of racism. For instance, I have very strong opinions about racism but, to my knowledge, have not been a victim of racism. I asked if you were a victim of racism because you are a text book example of white fragility. The mere suggestion that you you might in the least way be inconvenienced in the name of equality or diversity is enough to send you over the edge. Everything you have posted since has only confirmed my initial suspicion.

What?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank you for confirming that you think being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism. As I said, that's a weird take.

I never said such a thing let alone confirmed it. That is purely a figment of your imagination. What I did do is ask you a pretty simple question which you have twice avoided answering. I wonder what is difficult about this question?

Anonymous wrote:
And it's pretty clear that DCUM opposes diversity of ideas. There are plenty of POC who see CRT for the toxic, racist garbage it is. Check out John McWhorter for some insight. Most moderate Democrats like me also oppose it. Many of my progressive friends also oppose it. So it seems that the people who support it are a very narrow band of super-progressives. And don't you see the irony in what you wrote last? Proponents of CRT/DEI are the ones holding separate forums for different races, not classic liberals who would never.

You actually have no understanding of CRT which is one reason I have no interest in seeing you spew misinformation. Whatever POC who oppose CRT are welcome to speak for themselves. They certainly don't need a butt hurt white person such as yourself speaking on their behalf.

Of course you did. It was in the very question you asked. If you didn't believe that being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism you would not have asked the question. But yes Jeff, we have all been the victims of racism. But lets pretend for a moment that I haven't been a victim of racism. What then?

CRT is looking at everything through a racial lens and then categorizing it as oppressed or oppressor...which is insane.

And OK. https://johnmcwhorter.substack.com/p/todays-elect-left-is-as-anti-science (just FYI, "the elect" is JM's pet name for wokes)

You can have opinions about racism without being a victim of racism. For instance, I have very strong opinions about racism but, to my knowledge, have not been a victim of racism. I asked if you were a victim of racism because you are a text book example of white fragility. The mere suggestion that you you might in the least way be inconvenienced in the name of equality or diversity is enough to send you over the edge. Everything you have posted since has only confirmed my initial suspicion.

And what did you think of the McWhorter article?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:I don't know because I just deleted it immediately once I saw the topic. I simply can't handle any additional threads about how badly racism is affecting white people.

Sorry Jeff, but that makes you a racist.

LOL, are you a white person who is a victim of racism?

So you think someone has to be a victim of racism to oppose racism? That's a bold take Jeff.

I think you boldly avoided answering the question. I am sorry that the institutional racism of DCUM is oppressing white people. Maybe you can find a separate but equal forum?

Haha. Awesome line.

And thank you, Jeff. So tired of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:I don't know because I just deleted it immediately once I saw the topic. I simply can't handle any additional threads about how badly racism is affecting white people.

Sorry Jeff, but that makes you a racist.

LOL, are you a white person who is a victim of racism?

So you think someone has to be a victim of racism to oppose racism? That's a bold take Jeff.

I think you boldly avoided answering the question. I am sorry that the institutional racism of DCUM is oppressing white people. Maybe you can find a separate but equal forum?

Thank you for confirming that you think being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism. As I said, that's a weird take.

And it's pretty clear that DCUM opposes diversity of ideas. There are plenty of POC who see CRT for the toxic, racist garbage it is. Check out John McWhorter for some insight. Most moderate Democrats like me also oppose it. Many of my progressive friends also oppose it. So it seems that the people who support it are a very narrow band of super-progressives. And don't you see the irony in what you wrote last? Proponents of CRT/DEI are the ones holding separate forums for different races, not classic liberals who would never.

This white person feels perfectly welcome on DCUM. I’m pretty sure Jeff just isn’t interested in ignorant racists.

This progressive feels perfectly welcome on DCUM. I’m pretty sure Jeff just isn’t interested in diverse opinions.

FTFY.

Also, “classic liberals,” LOL. You can’t even get your bullsh*t buzzwords right.

And "classic liberal" is a thing. This was the definition of liberal before the wokes got to it and made it the opposite. Classic denotes original opposed to new and woke.

liberal
1. willing to respect or accept behavior or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas.
2. relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise.

The term is “classical liberal,” dear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:I don't know because I just deleted it immediately once I saw the topic. I simply can't handle any additional threads about how badly racism is affecting white people.

Sorry Jeff, but that makes you a racist.

LOL, are you a white person who is a victim of racism?

So you think someone has to be a victim of racism to oppose racism? That's a bold take Jeff.

I think you boldly avoided answering the question. I am sorry that the institutional racism of DCUM is oppressing white people. Maybe you can find a separate but equal forum?

Thank you for confirming that you think being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism. As I said, that's a weird take.

And it's pretty clear that DCUM opposes diversity of ideas. There are plenty of POC who see CRT for the toxic, racist garbage it is. Check out John McWhorter for some insight. Most moderate Democrats like me also oppose it. Many of my progressive friends also oppose it. So it seems that the people who support it are a very narrow band of super-progressives. And don't you see the irony in what you wrote last? Proponents of CRT/DEI are the ones holding separate forums for different races, not classic liberals who would never.

This white person feels perfectly welcome on DCUM. I’m pretty sure Jeff just isn’t interested in ignorant racists.

This progressive feels perfectly welcome on DCUM. I’m pretty sure Jeff just isn’t interested in diverse opinions.

FTFY.

Also, “classic liberals,” LOL. You can’t even get your bullsh*t buzzwords right.

And "classic liberal" is a thing. This was the definition of liberal before the wokes got to it and made it the opposite. Classic denotes original opposed to new and woke.

liberal
1. willing to respect or accept behavior or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas.
2. relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise.

The term is “classical liberal,” dear.

Ah. Thank you for that. Now, can you debate anything other than the incorrect term I used? I doubt it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:I don't know because I just deleted it immediately once I saw the topic. I simply can't handle any additional threads about how badly racism is affecting white people.

Sorry Jeff, but that makes you a racist.

LOL, are you a white person who is a victim of racism?

So you think someone has to be a victim of racism to oppose racism? That's a bold take Jeff.

I think you boldly avoided answering the question. I am sorry that the institutional racism of DCUM is oppressing white people. Maybe you can find a separate but equal forum?

Thank you for confirming that you think being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism. As I said, that's a weird take.

And it's pretty clear that DCUM opposes diversity of ideas. There are plenty of POC who see CRT for the toxic, racist garbage it is. Check out John McWhorter for some insight. Most moderate Democrats like me also oppose it. Many of my progressive friends also oppose it. So it seems that the people who support it are a very narrow band of super-progressives. And don't you see the irony in what you wrote last? Proponents of CRT/DEI are the ones holding separate forums for different races, not classic liberals who would never.

This white person feels perfectly welcome on DCUM. I’m pretty sure Jeff just isn’t interested in ignorant racists.

This progressive feels perfectly welcome on DCUM. I’m pretty sure Jeff just isn’t interested in diverse opinions.

FTFY.

Also, “classic liberals,” LOL. You can’t even get your bullsh*t buzzwords right.

And "classic liberal" is a thing. This was the definition of liberal before the wokes got to it and made it the opposite. Classic denotes original opposed to new and woke.

liberal
1. willing to respect or accept behavior or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas.
2. relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise.

The term is “classical liberal,” dear.

Ah. Thank you for that. Now, can you debate anything other than the incorrect term I used? I doubt it.

You were made fun of, and not by me, because the term you used was incorrect. Just clarifying for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:I don't know because I just deleted it immediately once I saw the topic. I simply can't handle any additional threads about how badly racism is affecting white people.

Sorry Jeff, but that makes you a racist.

LOL, are you a white person who is a victim of racism?

So you think someone has to be a victim of racism to oppose racism? That's a bold take Jeff.

I think you boldly avoided answering the question. I am sorry that the institutional racism of DCUM is oppressing white people. Maybe you can find a separate but equal forum?

Thank you for confirming that you think being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism. As I said, that's a weird take.

And it's pretty clear that DCUM opposes diversity of ideas. There are plenty of POC who see CRT for the toxic, racist garbage it is. Check out John McWhorter for some insight. Most moderate Democrats like me also oppose it. Many of my progressive friends also oppose it. So it seems that the people who support it are a very narrow band of super-progressives. And don't you see the irony in what you wrote last? Proponents of CRT/DEI are the ones holding separate forums for different races, not classic liberals who would never.

You are not a Dem. And Ex Republican here totally support it.

Racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:I don't know because I just deleted it immediately once I saw the topic. I simply can't handle any additional threads about how badly racism is affecting white people.

Sorry Jeff, but that makes you a racist.

LOL, are you a white person who is a victim of racism?

So you think someone has to be a victim of racism to oppose racism? That's a bold take Jeff.

I think you boldly avoided answering the question. I am sorry that the institutional racism of DCUM is oppressing white people. Maybe you can find a separate but equal forum?

Thank you for confirming that you think being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism. As I said, that's a weird take.

And it's pretty clear that DCUM opposes diversity of ideas. There are plenty of POC who see CRT for the toxic, racist garbage it is. Check out John McWhorter for some insight. Most moderate Democrats like me also oppose it. Many of my progressive friends also oppose it. So it seems that the people who support it are a very narrow band of super-progressives. And don't you see the irony in what you wrote last? Proponents of CRT/DEI are the ones holding separate forums for different races, not classic liberals who would never.

You are not a Dem. And Ex Republican here totally support it.

Racist.

My voter registration card says I'm a Dem. My voting record says I'm a Dem. I say I'm a Dem. Just because I don't subscribe to woke ultra-left ideas doesn't make me not a Dem. This is the problem with the woke. They are really blinded by their bubble. They consider anything more than 2 steps toward the center a Republican.

I'm curious, would you say McWhorter isn't a Dem either?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:I don't know because I just deleted it immediately once I saw the topic. I simply can't handle any additional threads about how badly racism is affecting white people.

Sorry Jeff, but that makes you a racist.

LOL, are you a white person who is a victim of racism?

So you think someone has to be a victim of racism to oppose racism? That's a bold take Jeff.

I think you boldly avoided answering the question. I am sorry that the institutional racism of DCUM is oppressing white people. Maybe you can find a separate but equal forum?

Thank you for confirming that you think being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism. As I said, that's a weird take.

And it's pretty clear that DCUM opposes diversity of ideas. There are plenty of POC who see CRT for the toxic, racist garbage it is. Check out John McWhorter for some insight. Most moderate Democrats like me also oppose it. Many of my progressive friends also oppose it. So it seems that the people who support it are a very narrow band of super-progressives. And don't you see the irony in what you wrote last? Proponents of CRT/DEI are the ones holding separate forums for different races, not classic liberals who would never.

You are not a Dem. And Ex Republican here totally support it.

Racist.

My voter registration card says I'm a Dem. My voting record says I'm a Dem. I say I'm a Dem. Just because I don't subscribe to woke ultra-left ideas doesn't make me not a Dem. This is the problem with the woke. They are really blinded by their bubble. They consider anything more than 2 steps toward the center a Republican.

I'm curious, would you say McWhorter isn't a Dem either?

NP - and do you mean John McWhorter? If so - he is a known, and enthusiastic, contrarian. He's a smart interesting guy, but pretty far outside of the mainstream when it comes to identifying and calling out racism. You can look to him as an example of someone who doesn't see racism where many do, but it would be hard to point to him as proof that something is or isn't racism. He's a lot of racists' "black friend" as well.

I don't know if he's a Democrat - I would guess he's a libertarian, or at least leans libertarian. I don't know who he votes for, though

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:I don't know because I just deleted it immediately once I saw the topic. I simply can't handle any additional threads about how badly racism is affecting white people.

Sorry Jeff, but that makes you a racist.

LOL, are you a white person who is a victim of racism?

So you think someone has to be a victim of racism to oppose racism? That's a bold take Jeff.

I think you boldly avoided answering the question. I am sorry that the institutional racism of DCUM is oppressing white people. Maybe you can find a separate but equal forum?

Thank you for confirming that you think being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism. As I said, that's a weird take.

And it's pretty clear that DCUM opposes diversity of ideas. There are plenty of POC who see CRT for the toxic, racist garbage it is. Check out John McWhorter for some insight. Most moderate Democrats like me also oppose it. Many of my progressive friends also oppose it. So it seems that the people who support it are a very narrow band of super-progressives. And don't you see the irony in what you wrote last? Proponents of CRT/DEI are the ones holding separate forums for different races, not classic liberals who would never.

You are not a Dem. And Ex Republican here totally support it.

Racist.

My voter registration card says I'm a Dem. My voting record says I'm a Dem. I say I'm a Dem. Just because I don't subscribe to woke ultra-left ideas doesn't make me not a Dem. This is the problem with the woke. They are really blinded by their bubble. They consider anything more than 2 steps toward the center a Republican.

I'm curious, would you say McWhorter isn't a Dem either?

NP - and do you mean John McWhorter? If so - he is a known, and enthusiastic, contrarian. He's a smart interesting guy, but pretty far outside of the mainstream when it comes to identifying and calling out racism. You can look to him as an example of someone who doesn't see racism where many do, but it would be hard to point to him as proof that something is or isn't racism. He's a lot of racists' "black friend" as well.

I don't know if he's a Democrat - I would guess he's a libertarian, or at least leans libertarian. I don't know who he votes for, though

^ Actually, sorry - I don't know if he's anyone's "black friend" - but he is a famous contrarian on issues of race.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:I don't know because I just deleted it immediately once I saw the topic. I simply can't handle any additional threads about how badly racism is affecting white people.

Sorry Jeff, but that makes you a racist.

LOL, are you a white person who is a victim of racism?

So you think someone has to be a victim of racism to oppose racism? That's a bold take Jeff.

I think you boldly avoided answering the question. I am sorry that the institutional racism of DCUM is oppressing white people. Maybe you can find a separate but equal forum?

Thank you for confirming that you think being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism. As I said, that's a weird take.

And it's pretty clear that DCUM opposes diversity of ideas. There are plenty of POC who see CRT for the toxic, racist garbage it is. Check out John McWhorter for some insight. Most moderate Democrats like me also oppose it. Many of my progressive friends also oppose it. So it seems that the people who support it are a very narrow band of super-progressives. And don't you see the irony in what you wrote last? Proponents of CRT/DEI are the ones holding separate forums for different races, not classic liberals who would never.

You are not a Dem. And Ex Republican here totally support it.

Racist.

My voter registration card says I'm a Dem. My voting record says I'm a Dem. I say I'm a Dem. Just because I don't subscribe to woke ultra-left ideas doesn't make me not a Dem. This is the problem with the woke. They are really blinded by their bubble. They consider anything more than 2 steps toward the center a Republican.

I'm curious, would you say McWhorter isn't a Dem either?

NP - and do you mean John McWhorter? If so - he is a known, and enthusiastic, contrarian. He's a smart interesting guy, but pretty far outside of the mainstream when it comes to identifying and calling out racism. You can look to him as an example of someone who doesn't see racism where many do, but it would be hard to point to him as proof that something is or isn't racism. He's a lot of racists' "black friend" as well.

I don't know if he's a Democrat - I would guess he's a libertarian, or at least leans libertarian. I don't know who he votes for, though

^ Actually, sorry - I don't know if he's anyone's "black friend" - but he is a famous contrarian on issues of race.

So the guy (McWhorter) who agrees with MLK is a contrarian but the guy who sees racism everywhere (Kendi) is mainstream? Hahahaha.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:I don't know because I just deleted it immediately once I saw the topic. I simply can't handle any additional threads about how badly racism is affecting white people.

Sorry Jeff, but that makes you a racist.

LOL, are you a white person who is a victim of racism?

So you think someone has to be a victim of racism to oppose racism? That's a bold take Jeff.

I think you boldly avoided answering the question. I am sorry that the institutional racism of DCUM is oppressing white people. Maybe you can find a separate but equal forum?

Thank you for confirming that you think being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism. As I said, that's a weird take.

And it's pretty clear that DCUM opposes diversity of ideas. There are plenty of POC who see CRT for the toxic, racist garbage it is. Check out John McWhorter for some insight. Most moderate Democrats like me also oppose it. Many of my progressive friends also oppose it. So it seems that the people who support it are a very narrow band of super-progressives. And don't you see the irony in what you wrote last? Proponents of CRT/DEI are the ones holding separate forums for different races, not classic liberals who would never.

You are not a Dem. And Ex Republican here totally support it.

Racist.

My voter registration card says I'm a Dem. My voting record says I'm a Dem. I say I'm a Dem. Just because I don't subscribe to woke ultra-left ideas doesn't make me not a Dem. This is the problem with the woke. They are really blinded by their bubble. They consider anything more than 2 steps toward the center a Republican.

I'm curious, would you say McWhorter isn't a Dem either?

NP - and do you mean John McWhorter? If so - he is a known, and enthusiastic, contrarian. He's a smart interesting guy, but pretty far outside of the mainstream when it comes to identifying and calling out racism. You can look to him as an example of someone who doesn't see racism where many do, but it would be hard to point to him as proof that something is or isn't racism. He's a lot of racists' "black friend" as well.

I don't know if he's a Democrat - I would guess he's a libertarian, or at least leans libertarian. I don't know who he votes for, though

^ Actually, sorry - I don't know if he's anyone's "black friend" - but he is a famous contrarian on issues of race.

So the guy (McWhorter) who agrees with MLK is a contrarian but the guy who sees racism everywhere (Kendi) is mainstream? Hahahaha.

Yes, McWhorter is a contrarian. Sorry the world doesn't totally align with your worldview or something. Hahahahaha.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:I don't know because I just deleted it immediately once I saw the topic. I simply can't handle any additional threads about how badly racism is affecting white people.

Sorry Jeff, but that makes you a racist.

LOL, are you a white person who is a victim of racism?

So you think someone has to be a victim of racism to oppose racism? That's a bold take Jeff.

I think you boldly avoided answering the question. I am sorry that the institutional racism of DCUM is oppressing white people. Maybe you can find a separate but equal forum?

Thank you for confirming that you think being a direct victim of racism is required to be against racism. As I said, that's a weird take.

And it's pretty clear that DCUM opposes diversity of ideas. There are plenty of POC who see CRT for the toxic, racist garbage it is. Check out John McWhorter for some insight. Most moderate Democrats like me also oppose it. Many of my progressive friends also oppose it. So it seems that the people who support it are a very narrow band of super-progressives. And don't you see the irony in what you wrote last? Proponents of CRT/DEI are the ones holding separate forums for different races, not classic liberals who would never.

You are not a Dem. And Ex Republican here totally support it.

Racist.

My voter registration card says I'm a Dem. My voting record says I'm a Dem. I say I'm a Dem. Just because I don't subscribe to woke ultra-left ideas doesn't make me not a Dem. This is the problem with the woke. They are really blinded by their bubble. They consider anything more than 2 steps toward the center a Republican.

I'm curious, would you say McWhorter isn't a Dem either?

NP - and do you mean John McWhorter? If so - he is a known, and enthusiastic, contrarian. He's a smart interesting guy, but pretty far outside of the mainstream when it comes to identifying and calling out racism. You can look to him as an example of someone who doesn't see racism where many do, but it would be hard to point to him as proof that something is or isn't racism. He's a lot of racists' "black friend" as well.

I don't know if he's a Democrat - I would guess he's a libertarian, or at least leans libertarian. I don't know who he votes for, though

^ Actually, sorry - I don't know if he's anyone's "black friend" - but he is a famous contrarian on issues of race.

So the guy (McWhorter) who agrees with MLK is a contrarian but the guy who sees racism everywhere (Kendi) is mainstream? Hahahaha.

Yes, McWhorter is a contrarian. Sorry the world doesn't totally align with your worldview or something. Hahahahaha.

I'm with MLK and McWhorter. You're with Kendi who lobbies for discrimination. And you think I'm out of tough with the world. Lol.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:I'm with MLK and McWhorter. You're with Kendi who lobbies for discrimination. And you think I'm out of tough with the world. Lol.

PP, whose views do you believe have more support within the Black community? McWhorter's or Kendi's?