OP here. I want to wait until a year before we start trying for another one. |
OP here. This is why I want to wait. We have an easy baby now, but who knows what he will be like through the other stages. He does sleep through the night. My husband is a great father and partner. We split most things 50/50. I do handle more childcare because I’m only going back to work part-time, but he is still very involved. We live in a condo with low maintenance, have a weekly housekeeper, and use HelloFresh. My husband is a great cook and food preps for meals on the weekend. We split most housekeeping duties equally. He does the bedtime routine when he gets home from work, and spends a lot of time with our son on the weekend. |
| Go for it.. close in age is ideal. Kids will always be at similar developmental ages, making everything in life easier. Trust me on this..everything from toys, family activities, playdates, carpooling, it will all be so much easier! |
Ha, this was my parents. They wanted 4. First so easy it was like, "we are AMAZING parents, let's keep it going!!" Second was like first-time parenting, they'd sleep on the floor through age 8, intensive therapy, horrible anxiety, ADHD, etc. Shut down the baby factory when #2 was 5ish. Sounds like you are the opposite, but this is not uncommon. |
So unfair to do to kids. |
|
I have several friends who have 2 easy babies, so it absolutely can happen. I think some people just have laid back personalities and make laid back kids. That said, I would wait until a year because 6 month olds are pretty easy (if they sleep well) and misleading as to the energy required once they get mobile.
If you’re breastfeeding, your period may not yet have returned, and so you are less likely to get pregnant until you wean. But odds go up if your baby is not breastfeeding overnight. |
OP here. I am breastfeeding but he is combo fed. He sleeps from 8-7 and eats 5 times a day. I'm not really that concerned if the second child will be easy. I think any child can be easy at one stage, and then hard the next stage. I have heard that laid back parents result in laid back babies, and high strung parents result in high strung babies. |
100% agree. Nothing worse than an only child. And before all the single children out there that are about to disagree with me, it absolutely normal to feel the way you do simply because you don’t know the difference your life would have been. What’s worse is if a single child has to go through a parents divorce, and yes 50% will. |
Agree. Wish I had done so. |
|
Depends on how desperately you want another kid and how much or little you value other things in your life.
I value my career, appearance and marriage A LOT so I wouldn’t be okay having two young children. It would make it much harder for me to be successful at work, spend time not with kids with my husband and stay below my goal weight. Not to mention college savings for the first. Some women seem to just not care and value having that second baby. |
C’mon. Are you trolling? There are plenty of siblings who don’t even have decent relationships. Your post is silly. |
i think the PP only mentioned that since you talk of getting pregnant at 6 months post partum. A lot (majority?) or women don't get their periods back until they ween, and some take months after weaning to return. So if you are truly interested in trying that early - you might have to wean to formula to allow your cycles to return to begin trying. |
Is t that what most doctors recommend? That the kids be at least twenty months apart. Wait. |
Wow. How shallow can you get? |
Breastfeeding is nature’s birth control. It’s very unlikely that you even have a period at 6 months. I breast fed each of my two kids until just over a year. I was in my early 30’s and we didn’t even bother with birth control until 9 months - and that’s because I was paranoid. I got my period shortly after weaning each kid - around 13 or 14 months postpartum. |