My SIL removed me from her Facebook account and stopped having skype time between the cousins. In case it's at the advice of her lawyer / she misses me too I wrote her a letter that I'm sorry this is all happening and that I wish her peace and the door is open down the road. So who knows...
In the meantime the money / debt my family told me about is on non-essentials (spa, jewelry, art, replacing all the furniture in their home etc). He's not including things like mortgage, food, lawyers etc in the list. He didn't tell me about it directly - probably because he knows I'd worry. |
There are at least two sides to every story. Sounds like you're hearing one and even that is through whisper down the alley. You never know what goes on in someone else's relationship and you will never know why she is spending the mo e.g. (If it's even true that she is). Presumably if they are going through a divorce, he has a lawyer and any decent lawyer would have told him how to protect his money. |
Be skeptical. |
I can feel your pain, OP. It's lovely that you've reached out to her & I'm sure that she appreciates it, especially when you're not sure if the other side of the family hates you now. Sadly though, I wouldn't expect a reply back. Her council has most likely filled her head with paranoia about speaking to anyone from your side of the family. As a former paralegal, I imagine her council has probably warned her that you'll try to manipulate her into saying something that your brother can use against her, or that will sabotage her during divorce proceedings. Even if your SIL implores to her attorneys that you'd NEVER do something so morally & ethically reprehensible to her, that such behavior would go so totally against your nature that the thought is completely infallible to her, it's their job to convince her otherwise. They will instill as much fear, paranoia & distrust in her regarding your side of the family as they possibly can, sad to say. The partner of our firm used to tell us that divorce is commensurable to an all out war - a battle for the ages between two super power countries. Anyone that was caught behind the scenes conversing or conferring with the other side (better known as "the enemy") even if it had absolutely nothing to do with the divorce, it was considered a traitorous action & traitors CAN never and WILL never be trusted. With regards to the the portion of your post that I bolded... Replacing household furniture that one spouse has retained after abandoning the marital residence, IS constituted as an "essential" purchase during divorce proceedings, especially if there are children involved (not so much for the children's "physical comfort" per se, but more so for their positive mental health & maintaining a sense of normalcy for them during the divorce). That being said, your SIL should only be purchasing furniture to replace any items that were taken by your brother when he/she moved out. Additionally, she should make every attempt to ensure that her purchases are either comparable/equal or "less than" in value to the items being replaced. Replacing furniture does NOT give her carte blanche to irresponsibly splurge on overly extravagant items that the couple has NEVER owned in their marital home or is not listed as a marital asset. There's a huge difference between purchasing quality yet affordable furniture from someplace like IKEA or Regency Furniture, and her indulging strictly on high end & expensive furniture from places like French Heritage or Restoration Hardware. If she truly is spending irresponsibly & your brothers council is worth a lick of salt, they'll have plenty of evidence to present to the judge (especially if they're attempting to use a character assassination strategy). When a judge is adjudicating divorce proceedings & evidence is presented showing one of the partners (either the plaintiff OR the complainant) spending marital assets haphazardly & selfishly, the judge does NOT look favorably upon them. |
My sister made and makes more money than he does. The money he wasted were funds she had earned and invested for their kids. The kids now have student loans and are fully aware that their dad is an asshole. |
Op here. My understanding is my brother didn't take any furniture. I think he rented a furnished apartment but I don't really know his living situation. I actually sort of get her impulse to redecorate since it's the stuff they shared (and a lot was inherited from my relatives) but I still feel really sad about the waist. Apart from concern for my brother and nephew I also assume this will indirectly impact my finances - if my parents feel compelled to help my brother (and I'm sure they do) there's less, for instance, to help with gifts toward our own college savings etc. That's not a main concern at all, but I do think that's in the back of my mind. |
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/629536.page#10604711 More at the link than 2 quotes below
|
I'm very skeptical about this. His business finances should be structured so that he takes his draw and pays his expenses wholly independent of what she puts on credit cards. If he's having trouble keeping his business afloat, that's on him, not her. It sounds to me like he's having his own financial troubles and is making up a story to try to get your parents to give him money. |
FYI, pp, IKEA isn't "quality" furniture. |
Child support is calculated based partly on spending before the divorce so many women do this to increase their benefit. I did it myself, getting a nicer condo than I probably would have done because I knew the court would consider current rent. He ended up with a much better lifestyle than me. I'm not sorry.
|
God, I know! I don't even know why there's a statutory requirement for you to support your own children. Jesus, once you divorce their other parent, they should just take your name off the birth certificate and the taxpayers can pick up the tab for a while. You put in your time! |
When his erratic behavior and threats required my ex move out, he initially didn't remove furnishings he owned from before marriage. However, I knew he would get them in the divorce and I replaced them before he claimed his stuff so here wouldn't be a night my kids and I didn't what we needed. Solid wood. Not IKEA. It was not an issue for the judge. |
Your case sounds absolutely NOTHING like this one. Your ex was forced from your home due to his threats & threatening/erratic behavior, of course a judge is going to sympathize with you, duh. She also said that her SIL is spending extravagantly on non essential items. A judge is definitely going to take issue with reckless spending in an irresponsible way, especially when it's to the tune of emptying out their children's college funds to pay for her spa dates & over priced nonsense. You're ridiculous if you think buying your "solid wood" furniture (lol) even compares to the frivolous spending in this case. There's always one who just has to make everything about themselves though. ![]() |
When going through a divorce ex said he was paying me too much support. He told me this afer friends informed him I went to the salon for a cut and style ![]() |
Written in response to the person who implied that only furniture already removed was acceptable to replace and that it should be IKEA type. |