Commander in Chief Forum

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not a whole lot of comments on Hillary's "showing." Bet when Trump takes the stage, there will be criticism and insults galore.

The thread title was too obscure for me to have any idea what the thread was about before clicking and reading.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.

The issue is classified info being on a low-side server at all, though... Classified information shouldn't be in a state.gov email either, it's not a secure classified environment. So, issues with classification aren't the same as issues with her private server, which most people find objectionable because it seems like a way to conceal information from FOIA, which is kind of the exact opposite problem.

Also, I'm pretty sure the classified info was sent TO her, which I don't think you can really fault her for. And it was inconsistently marked and some of the stuff that was marked wasn't actually classified etc etc. I think the classification stuff is mostly a false flag. Talk about FOIA concerns if you want to hit her on email.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a whole lot of comments on Hillary's "showing." Bet when Trump takes the stage, there will be criticism and insults galore.

The thread title was too obscure for me to have any idea what the thread was about before clicking and reading.

OP. That was my fault. Don't think there's any way for me to edit it though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.

The issue is classified info being on a low-side server at all, though... Classified information shouldn't be in a state.gov email either, it's not a secure classified environment. So, issues with classification aren't the same as issues with her private server, which most people find objectionable because it seems like a way to conceal information from FOIA, which is kind of the exact opposite problem.

Also, I'm pretty sure the classified info was sent TO her, which I don't think you can really fault her for. And it was inconsistently marked and some of the stuff that was marked wasn't actually classified etc etc. I think the classification stuff is mostly a false flag. Talk about FOIA concerns if you want to hit her on email.

Well, we know that she had instructed one of her aides to remove classified headers on a fax and send it unsecured. Bet she had the same instructions to her staff - and so she's sticking with the "no header" excuse. None of this would be an issue if she hadn't set up the secret unsecured server in the first place.

[Anonymous]

So is it me or is Trump not actually answering the questions being asked of him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.

The issue is classified info being on a low-side server at all, though... Classified information shouldn't be in a state.gov email either, it's not a secure classified environment. So, issues with classification aren't the same as issues with her private server, which most people find objectionable because it seems like a way to conceal information from FOIA, which is kind of the exact opposite problem.

Also, I'm pretty sure the classified info was sent TO her, which I don't think you can really fault her for. And it was inconsistently marked and some of the stuff that was marked wasn't actually classified etc etc. I think the classification stuff is mostly a false flag. Talk about FOIA concerns if you want to hit her on email.

Well, we know that she had instructed one of her aides to remove classified headers on a fax and send it unsecured. Bet she had the same instructions to her staff - and so she's sticking with the "no header" excuse. None of this would be an issue if she hadn't set up the secret unsecured server in the first place.

It would be because state.gov emails are not hosted on a secure server.

[Anonymous]

Trump is way out of his league here. He sounds like a bumbling idiot taking questions from somebody other than Sean Hannity

[Anonymous]

Trump is such a load of bullshit

[Anonymous]

I'm a Hillary supporter and this is making me SO excited for the debates. Trump looks like such a moron. All talk, no action. No ideas. No answers.

[Anonymous]

What an arrogant douchebag

[Anonymous]

He is so painful to listen to. He sounds ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

he isn't answering any of these questions

and then he went on that sidebar about taking the oil.

jeebus.

[Anonymous]

Neither one is impressive. Just goes to show - again - how poor a choice we have. One is a consummate liar, and the other is out of his league.

[Anonymous]

This guy is dumber than I thought. He has said absolutely nothing.

[Anonymous]

I was undecided. After tonight I'm with Hillary.