Commander in Chief Forum

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

Why? Because finally we have someone from the MSM who asks tough questionS? He didn't protect HRC and limit his difficult questions to Ttump? I thought it was fair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

agree. he was totally lame. Asked only asked HRC the hard questions and then kept cutting her off when she actually tried to answer, scolded her to not get negative and then totally wimped out with Trump. Trump is an expert with stupid people who are OK with getting bullied, i.e. Lauer and all of the idiots that will get Trump elected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

agree. he was totally lame. Asked only asked HRC the hard questions and then kept cutting her off when she actually tried to answer, scolded her to not get negative and then totally wimped out with Trump. Trump is an expert with stupid people who are OK with getting bullied, i.e. Lauer and all of the idiots that will get Trump elected.

Not the way I saw it. I think liberals are used to the liberal media playing footsie with "their" candidates - what's your favorite color? - that when they come across a journalist who does his job, they see it as slanted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

Why? Because finally we have someone from the MSM who asks tough questionS? He didn't protect HRC and limit his difficult questions to Ttump? I thought it was fair.

Oh please. He totally gave Trump a pass when he said he opposed the Iraq war. Do you have selective hearing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

Why? Because finally we have someone from the MSM who asks tough questionS? He didn't protect HRC and limit his difficult questions to Ttump? I thought it was fair.

Oh please. He totally gave Trump a pass when he said he opposed the Iraq war. Do you have selective hearing?

Now you know how the conservatives have felt all these years, with the liberal media giving the Democrats a pass on everything. Irritating, isn't it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.

She still does not understand classified information should be stored in classified system not in her basement on a public and non-secure network. The two system does not connect because they are on two different network.

Yup. And the reason the classified info didn't have classified headers is because she told her staff to remove classified headers before sending to her home server. As if that would make it OK.

And the lies just keep getting more ridiculous....

You do realize that Hillary Clinton as SoS had the authority to classify and declassify information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

Why? Because finally we have someone from the MSM who asks tough questionS? He didn't protect HRC and limit his difficult questions to Ttump? I thought it was fair.

Oh please. He totally gave Trump a pass when he said he opposed the Iraq war. Do you have selective hearing?

Trump did oppose the war in Iraq. Don't give me the BS of the "I guess so" from the great journalist Howard Stern.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

Why? Because finally we have someone from the MSM who asks tough questionS? He didn't protect HRC and limit his difficult questions to Ttump? I thought it was fair.

Oh please. He totally gave Trump a pass when he said he opposed the Iraq war. Do you have selective hearing?

Trump did oppose the war in Iraq. Don't give me the BS of the "I guess so" from the great journalist Howard Stern.

No, he did not oppose the Iraq war.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

Why? Because finally we have someone from the MSM who asks tough questionS? He didn't protect HRC and limit his difficult questions to Ttump? I thought it was fair.

Really? He told HRC Not to attack DJT and told DJT to keep attacks to a minimum. He did not ask DJT about his contribution to Bondi but tried to skewer HRC about email.

As has been noted so frequently. HRC's main problem is that she has no penis!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

Why? Because finally we have someone from the MSM who asks tough questionS? He didn't protect HRC and limit his difficult questions to Ttump? I thought it was fair.

And Matt Lauer did not ask a single question about Clinton Foundation pay for play. He didn't question HRC's lie about no dead Americans in Libya. What more does MSM want from him, asking how her labor day went?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

Why? Because finally we have someone from the MSM who asks tough questionS? He didn't protect HRC and limit his difficult questions to Ttump? I thought it was fair.

Really? He told HRC Not to attack DJT and told DJT to keep attacks to a minimum. He did not ask DJT about his contribution to Bondi but tried to skewer HRC about email.

As has been noted so frequently. HRC's main problem is that she has no penis!

Back to the gender card. So tell me. When someone says Obama has been a bad president, do you pull out the race card, too?

[Anonymous]

The fact that Donnie didn't actually answer a question seems to have escaped many of your attention.

But Lauer really should have called him on it - "that doesn't answer my question" would have been so easy to say

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

Why? Because finally we have someone from the MSM who asks tough questionS? He didn't protect HRC and limit his difficult questions to Ttump? I thought it was fair.

Oh please. He totally gave Trump a pass when he said he opposed the Iraq war. Do you have selective hearing?

Trump did oppose the war in Iraq. Don't give me the BS of the "I guess so" from the great journalist Howard Stern.

Cite?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

Why? Because finally we have someone from the MSM who asks tough questionS? He didn't protect HRC and limit his difficult questions to Ttump? I thought it was fair.

Oh please. He totally gave Trump a pass when he said he opposed the Iraq war. Do you have selective hearing?

Now you know how the conservatives have felt all these years, with the liberal media giving the Democrats a pass on everything. Irritating, isn't it?

The liberal media is a conservative myth, not that you'll stop lying about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

Why? Because finally we have someone from the MSM who asks tough questionS? He didn't protect HRC and limit his difficult questions to Ttump? I thought it was fair.

Oh please. He totally gave Trump a pass when he said he opposed the Iraq war. Do you have selective hearing?

Trump did oppose the war in Iraq. Don't give me the BS of the "I guess so" from the great journalist Howard Stern.

No he did not. Do you have a credible source that says otherwise? I'm not holding my breath.