Commander in Chief Forum

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

agree. he was totally lame. Asked only asked HRC the hard questions and then kept cutting her off when she actually tried to answer, scolded her to not get negative and then totally wimped out with Trump. Trump is an expert with stupid people who are OK with getting bullied, i.e. Lauer and all of the idiots that will get Trump elected.

Not the way I saw it. I think liberals are used to the liberal media playing footsie with "their" candidates - what's your favorite color? - that when they come across a journalist who does his job, they see it as slanted.

As a "lib" I want them both to be asked really tough questions. It's for the Presidency. It's important. I don't care about style. If my candidate can't answer, that is a problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
What was Hillary wearing in her ear?

She had something in her ear?

Yes. It wasn't a studio mic, but possibly a prompter helping her to stay focused and not get so confused.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
What was Hillary wearing in her ear?

She had something in her ear?

Yes. It wasn't a studio mic, but possibly a prompter helping her to stay focused and not get so confused.

Says the supporter of a man who cant talk two sentences without conflicting what he said in the first sentence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

agree. he was totally lame. Asked only asked HRC the hard questions and then kept cutting her off when she actually tried to answer, scolded her to not get negative and then totally wimped out with Trump. Trump is an expert with stupid people who are OK with getting bullied, i.e. Lauer and all of the idiots that will get Trump elected.

Not the way I saw it. I think liberals are used to the liberal media playing footsie with "their" candidates - what's your favorite color? - that when they come across a journalist who does his job, they see it as slanted.

As a "lib" I want them both to be asked really tough questions. It's for the Presidency. It's important. I don't care about style. If my candidate can't answer, that is a problem.

+1.

So I get that when Trump decided to throw his hat in the presidential race, he probably never imagined he'd get this far. Fair enough. Now that he has, he really needs to take a one week break from the campaign trail for a crash course in the presidency and U.S. government in general. He keeps embarrassing himself by how ignorant he is about how things work (e.g., the rambling on about the generals).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Lauer is a disgrace.

Why? Because finally we have someone from the MSM who asks tough questionS? He didn't protect HRC and limit his difficult questions to Ttump? I thought it was fair.

Really? He told HRC Not to attack DJT and told DJT to keep attacks to a minimum. He did not ask DJT about his contribution to Bondi but tried to skewer HRC about email.

As has been noted so frequently. HRC's main problem is that she has no penis!

Back to the gender card. So tell me. When someone says Obama has been a bad president, do you pull out the race card, too?

No. I blame it on inexperience and this is why we should never again why someone with zero political and diplomatic experience. Trump has neither.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:hrc is a terrible public speaker. she's a mess

Yup, I feel sorry for the poor thing.