Reply to Commander in Chief Forum

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Commander in Chief Forum"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.[/quote]

The issue is classified info being on a low-side server at all, though... Classified information shouldn't be in a state.gov email either, it's not a secure classified environment. So, issues with classification aren't the same as issues with her private server, which most people find objectionable because it seems like a way to conceal information from FOIA, which is kind of the exact opposite problem.

Also, I'm pretty sure the classified info was sent TO her, which I don't think you can really fault her for. And it was inconsistently marked and some of the stuff that was marked wasn't actually classified etc etc. I think the classification stuff is mostly a false flag. Talk about FOIA concerns if you want to hit her on email. [/quote]
Well, we know that she had instructed one of her aides to remove classified headers on a fax and send it unsecured. Bet she had the same instructions to her staff - and so she's sticking with the "no header" excuse. None of this would be an issue if she hadn't set up the secret unsecured server in the first place. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics