It does seem a little odd. What was all that with the Budget Proposal Tool and challenges to find places to cut? I did not expect a budget that made no cuts and is even larger. Is this a case of the Superintendent Who Cried Wolf or is the cutting part still to come? |
The cutting part is still to come, after they know how much they will get from all players. She is telling the school board what she needs to run the system and it will up to the School Board to make the cuts to meet the budget constraints. |
Are we in middle school? Wow! |
I find it so obnoxious that you felt the need to start a snarky post, just to prove some kind of point. It's the equivalent of nanny nanny boo-boo and really immature. |
+1 Cringe-worthy. |
Settle down Prim Polly. Not the PP but this mild bit of comeuppance hardly compares to the gleeful vitriol spewed by those celebrating the possible end to centers in recent threads on the issue. This is the internet after all. |
| I think this is a bit misleading. Her budget is 67 million short. When the SB/BOS asks what will happen if she doesn't get the 67 million, she points to the task force recommendations, and that's when the decision will be made. |
Negative. She has already stated some of the recommendations are not viable. |
|
AAP will not be cut. Centers will be eliminated and AAP moved into schools.
It's easier to reconfigure a program than to cut something else all together. |
|
| What are you, twelve? GIFs add no value to any discussion. |
| Give me a break. They can find $67 mm. My vote is suck it up and get the $$$$$. |
Powerball! |
And we wonder why our country is a fiscal mess. Sometimes, my dear, people have to live within their means. |
You're right. There was absolutely no snarky "another reason why Centers are going" posts celebrating the imminent demise of Centers after the Budget Task Force recommendations came out. Sore loser with a double standard much?
|