Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
I agree with this. I have been upfront with my managers simply because I must have flexible hours, etc. While they all have been understanding, I do sometimes get the sense that some do not really get it, however I have made up for that by working hard and making myself indispensable. On the other hand, if things don't seem to be working out, I'll either speak directly to my manager about his/her expectations and whether I'm meeting them, or I'll look for alternatives (new job, different department, or (as a last resort) becoming a SAHM temporarily). |
| I managed a large number of employees both before and after kids. I can't say that I make more concessions now than I did in the past but I have always been pretty flexible as long as you are smart, very productive, and make it up later at some point. The level of flexibility that I extend to an employee is directly related to how well they perform and the reason why they want to tele-work, shift their schedule, come in late or leave early doesn't really matter to me. I would be highly annoyed at someone who performed just OK to to just barely and expected special considerations just because she has children. I would be even more annoyed by an employee who felt that I would expect less of her if I had my own kids. |
Thank you for putting this so well. This is the Debbie Downer who has been trying to make this point, but not doing so as eloquently. |
You have to be careful about calling in sick bcause some companies and Federal agencies are now checking to see if person is really sick. So, if you decide to go to the grocery store that day, and you're being spyed on, being sick isn't going to fly for not coming to work. Female bosses, by and large, are impossible, I've had two and never again,. I supervise several women and believe me, they don't know how lucky they are, because I do understand where they are coming from. Good luck. |
I could have written this post and I agree wholeheartedly. I also dont necessarily think that it is unreasonable for a boss to expect some flexibility out of their team. What needs to be accomplished through the course of a day can and does change - that also can alter the demands of the team. What is a network crashes? what if there is a flood? what if power is lost? what if a very rude and demanding client needs you AT 445? These are all things that have happened in my workplace within the last three months. Who should be responsible for following these challenges through to the end? In my experience, it has unfortunately been the childless people and people can become resentful. My only point is that mothers returning to work also need to be flexible. and it sucks. |
In my experience, it's always the NEW people who take care of the emergency/shit work. And most of them happen to be childless because they are usually younger and not at that stage in their lives. Doesn't stop them from being resentful and feeling entitled to flexibility others have earned through being overproductive for years before having kids and needing that flexibility! |
|
I find this hard to believe in this economy. With a federal pay freeze and many private sector companies laying off huge numbers of people I don't get the sense that the government or private companies are leaching money by following people in the suburbs. In any event, if my child is sick and I take off work my company and boss is fine with me using sick days for that. My boss used sick days to care of an elderly out of state parent for a week as well. And if I have a doctor appointment that is planned I can also take paid admin leave as long as I am gone no more than 3.5 hours. I also have been very sick before and had to leave my house - to go to the doctor, pick up medication, or pick up something from the grocery. Good luck following me in traffic to see what I'm buying and if this fits a sick day scenario. I got a kick out of picturing this. I'm a nonprofit director level position making $85K a year and the thought of someone spending money to trail me makes me smile...unfortunately I don't think I'm that important
Reading all this really makes me lucky I work for such a reasonable company and supervisor. Because my husband has such flexibility as well, and because we have family nearby, my co-workers really haven't noticed a big change since I've become a mom. Everyone gets a fair amount of flexibility even if you are childless in both our companies. You just need to get your work done....and there is not a huge concern over when and where so long as you meet deadlines. |
|
Not to hijack the thread but I think OP does need to check on her legal rights. I'm a federal employee and when I was returning to work after maternity leave I was shocked to learn that I had no legal rights to protection for pumping. This was before the healthcare bill was passed (and even that is not yet implemented). Apparently breastfeeding isn't considered a result of pregnancy and thus not enveloped in the protected status? I think it's ridiculous but just thought I'd share.
I ended-up getting permission to pump and a modified schedule during the first year. I went to my HR rep with my proposal and then she presented it to my supervisor. The good news for pumping and its limitations was that I was only planning on pumping until the baby was 1 year. I reentered my job when the baby was 3 months so I essentially had 9 months. When a year was up I went in to the HR rep and my boss to say thank you and to let them know my needs had changed. Now, dealing with coworkers and meetings...that was a whole other problem. Good luck OP -- check with your union before going back to work and find out if your agency already has pumping rooms. If they do, you are one step ahead. |
| I think it's a case of random luck -- e.g. if someone finds you posting a "LOL hung over" post on Facebook, or someone happens to see you at the store looking chipper as can be, then you'll get dinged/disciplined/terminated as the spirit moved your boss. Unless, of course, you've already been marked as a problem child by your boss and they're looking for something to get you on. |
| Knock off the stereotyping and spruce up your negotiating skills. |
|
I have a boss who started out as an inflexible micro-manager- the micromanaging went away as soon as I proved myself and started being proactive by showing her what I was working on. Now she is one of the most flexible bosses I've had.
Still, when I take time of due to DS, I largely don't advertise it. She gets a little annoyed with too much kid stuff - has wondered out lout if it is "my husband's turn", so I just don't mention it has to do with DS now. My advise is don't talk about your kids too much at work to your boss if you are feeling this way, and take the time you need by all means, but don't advertise so much that it is kid driven. Make your prompt departure due to a train schedule, etc. |
The federal government must now make adequate arrangements to facilitate pumping. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/12/obama_orders_new_federal_breas.html?hpid=news-col-blog |
| As someone mentioned above, one key responsibility of a manager is to balance the needs of employees with families and childless employees. I've seen situations where the childless people are always asked to pick up the slack ( more travel, cover evening events, cover coworkers when their kid is sick again) and they get very resentful. |
|
"My advise is don't talk about your kids too much at work to your boss if you are feeling this way, and take the time you need by all means, but don't advertise so much that it is kid driven."
Ditto. |