Should single women over 35 settle if they want children?

Anonymous
You should not have a child with someone unless you want that person to be in your life forever. Is this not particularly attractive person kind, reliable, trustworthy, someone who shares your value and that you enjoy spending time with? If it's just that the purely physical is meh, but he's otherwise a great potential partner, I'd give it a hard think if motherhood is important to you. If you're physically turned off by him though, that's not a recipe for success.
Anonymous
Read "The Case for Settling" by Lori Gottlieb. The title is clickbait but it's more about prioritizing what attributes matter to you the most.
Anonymous
There's no right answer because "Settle" covers everything from "he's only 5'11"/is slightly balding/only makes $150,000 but is otherwise perfect and we're very happy together" to "He's not an evil person but I cringe every time I see him."

In those cases, the answer is obvious, but in real life it's never that clear cut. We are all flawed, but deciding when the flaws are deal breakers can be difficult.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Just go the sperm bank and do it yourself.


Not everyone wants or can be a single mother. This is a very privileged take.


Rich, white DC women talking about privilege. That’s funny!
Anonymous
I was in a long term relationship, but due to a series of circumstances we didn't have any children. Our relationship went down the drain for unrelated reasons. I was 36 at the time and soon jumped into a relationship with a great guy I wasn't attracted to. I tried really hard to get passed that and I just couldn't. I eventually met someone I really like, but I was already 41 and pregnancy didn't happen. This isn't an ideal situation, but being with someone I'm mad about put things into perspective. I value sexual attraction too much to settle for someone for any reason.
Anonymous
It's not a binary choice of settling or not settling. You need to think about what specific traits are important to you, and select for those traits while letting go of the things that aren't as important. Nobody is going to be 100% perfect, so you need to choose where to put your attention.

I'd advise letting go of superficial ideals like looks, powerful career, or excitement. Look for traits like honesty, respect, dependability, and fairness. That may look like "settling", but it's really just being deliberate about what you want. Of course, your choices may be different from mine - the point is to make your choices, whatever they are.

Once you make your choice, don't think of it as settling - that mindset is a sure path to misery. Focus on the reasons you are choosing this person.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Just go the sperm bank and do it yourself.


Not everyone wants or can be a single mother. This is a very privileged take.


Rich, white DC women talking about privilege. That’s funny!


How do you know I'm white?
Anonymous
Don't stay with someone if attraction isn't there. Their other qualities are irrelevant.
Anonymous
Gray divorce lawyers really hope you choose to settle.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Or is it better to be childless than partner up with someone you don't want?

By "settling" I don't mean "dating someone imperfect or bad on paper", I'm talking about getting with someone you're not that attracted to.


It might be helpful to consider yourself more objectively. You're probably not as special as you think. Consider that you're not likely the guy's first choice, either.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Or is it better to be childless than partner up with someone you don't want?

By "settling" I don't mean "dating someone imperfect or bad on paper", I'm talking about getting with someone you're not that attracted to.


Depends on your preferences and options.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Just go the sperm bank and do it yourself.


Not everyone wants or can be a single mother. This is a very privileged take.


Rich, white DC women talking about privilege. That’s funny!


How do you know I'm white?


NP here. I am white (if that matters to some here) and set 35 as the age by which I would try to meet someone I didn’t settle for. Then I’d have a child on my own. I decided adoption was the best option for me and adopted DD at age 38. I didn’t crack $100K salary until she was in high school, but it was fine.

We lived in a small, one bathroom house in an OK school district and took one big vacation a year. I always told her we may not have everything we want, but we have everything we need. For me it was priorities, not privilege.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Just go the sperm bank and do it yourself.


Adopt.
Anonymous
Foster.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Or is it better to be childless than partner up with someone you don't want?

By "settling" I don't mean "dating someone imperfect or bad on paper", I'm talking about getting with someone you're not that attracted to.


Choosing someone because you are desperate is the worst thing you can do to that person.
post reply Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: