Surrogacy help

[Anonymous]

Should you be bringing a baby into the world with these "health problems"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

You can’t see the issue of commoditizing babies? You seriously don’t see the ethics issue with that? Are you that obtuse?
Watch the world burn? What are you talking about? Are you medicating?

OK, got for it. I will give you a brief audience. Tell me why you think my situation is "commoditizing babies." This should be good.

I underestimated you; you are more obtuse than I gave you credit for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

Desperate woman.

Wait, do you think I am a woman? Ha, that makes these responses even better.

That gave me second hand embarrassment for you.

[Anonymous]

OP - the desperate women are the women forced for financial reasons to carry your embryo. The very fact that you thought about yourself first and not the womb-for-hire is very telling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

You can’t see the issue of commoditizing babies? You seriously don’t see the ethics issue with that? Are you that obtuse?
Watch the world burn? What are you talking about? Are you medicating?

OK, got for it. I will give you a brief audience. Tell me why you think my situation is "commoditizing babies." This should be good.

I underestimated you; you are more obtuse than I gave you credit for.

Thank you, Mr. Dufresne. And great response -- very educational.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

Desperate woman.

Wait, do you think I am a woman? Ha, that makes these responses even better.

Okay, desperate man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Should you be bringing a baby into the world with these "health problems"?

I don't have health problems -- my wife does. Our little guy is doing just fine, so why would my wife's health problems be an issue. Interesting comment given that you have no idea what her health problems are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

You can’t see the issue of commoditizing babies? You seriously don’t see the ethics issue with that? Are you that obtuse?
Watch the world burn? What are you talking about? Are you medicating?

OK, got for it. I will give you a brief audience. Tell me why you think my situation is "commoditizing babies." This should be good.

I underestimated you; you are more obtuse than I gave you credit for.

Thank you, Mr. Dufresne. And great response -- very educational.

You should not have any children if you cannot put it together yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

You can’t see the issue of commoditizing babies? You seriously don’t see the ethics issue with that? Are you that obtuse?
Watch the world burn? What are you talking about? Are you medicating?

OK, got for it. I will give you a brief audience. Tell me why you think my situation is "commoditizing babies." This should be good.

I underestimated you; you are more obtuse than I gave you credit for.

Thank you, Mr. Dufresne. And great response -- very educational.

Cementing it more and more. Get your crayons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP - the desperate women are the women forced for financial reasons to carry your embryo. The very fact that you thought about yourself first and not the womb-for-hire is very telling.

No one is being forced to do anything in my scenario. The fact that you are assuming that is "very telling" indeed. There are undoubtedly thousands upon thousands of surrogacy situations where no one is being forced to do anything. It is either transactional, as most things are in this world, or altruistic. You seem to have a problem with the bad surrogacy situations, and so do I. You can like the good and hate the bad. Pretty simple concept.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP - the desperate women are the women forced for financial reasons to carry your embryo. The very fact that you thought about yourself first and not the womb-for-hire is very telling.

+1. There’s a reason that surrogacy is illegal in much of Western Europe. It’s exploitive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

You can’t see the issue of commoditizing babies? You seriously don’t see the ethics issue with that? Are you that obtuse?
Watch the world burn? What are you talking about? Are you medicating?

OK, got for it. I will give you a brief audience. Tell me why you think my situation is "commoditizing babies." This should be good.

I underestimated you; you are more obtuse than I gave you credit for.

Thank you, Mr. Dufresne. And great response -- very educational.

No one knows what you are talking about. You’re dumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP - the desperate women are the women forced for financial reasons to carry your embryo. The very fact that you thought about yourself first and not the womb-for-hire is very telling.

+1. There’s a reason that surrogacy is illegal in much of Western Europe. It’s exploitive.

Bingo!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should you be bringing a baby into the world with these "health problems"?

I don't have health problems -- my wife does. Our little guy is doing just fine, so why would my wife's health problems be an issue. Interesting comment given that you have no idea what her health problems are.

We know enough about her mental problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems like a typical request you’d use an agency for.

Is it? OK, that is helpful to know if true. Just seems like most things I read are about people going to agencies to either have the surrogate help them create a baby, or have them work with IVF places to get pregnant (i.e., continue to go through IVF process). We literally only have one embryo to transfer and that is it -- no more IVF, etc. In any event, helpful to know, thanks.

As for the peanut gallery, reading about people taking issue surrogacy on here is one of the more bizarre things I see. I get the problems with forced surrogacy overseas, but I can't for the life of me see how someone could take issue with someone want to help someone else start a family when they are unable to for health reasons. But obviously many must like to troll and/or watch the world burn. It is at least good entertainment reading the responses, so I appreciate that part of it.

You can’t see the issue of commoditizing babies? You seriously don’t see the ethics issue with that? Are you that obtuse?
Watch the world burn? What are you talking about? Are you medicating?

OK, got for it. I will give you a brief audience. Tell me why you think my situation is "commoditizing babies." This should be good.

I underestimated you; you are more obtuse than I gave you credit for.

Thank you, Mr. Dufresne. And great response -- very educational.

You should not have any children if you cannot put it together yourself.

The common refrain of somehow who has nothing to say: "IF YOU DON'T KNOW ALREADY, THEN I CAN'T HELP YOU" Ha, classic.